Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-1999-0295: Solaris sysdef command allows local users to read kernel memory, potentially leading to root privile

0
High
VulnerabilityCVE-1999-0295cve-1999-0295
Published: Wed Oct 01 1997 (10/01/1997, 04:00:00 UTC)
Source: NVD
Vendor/Project: sun
Product: solaris

Description

Solaris sysdef command allows local users to read kernel memory, potentially leading to root privileges.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 06/30/2025, 12:55:14 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-1999-0295 is a high-severity vulnerability affecting multiple versions of the Solaris operating system, specifically versions 2.4, 2.5, 2.5.1, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, and 5.5.1. The vulnerability arises from the Solaris 'sysdef' command, which allows local users to read kernel memory. Access to kernel memory can expose sensitive information such as kernel data structures, memory contents, and potentially security-critical information. By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker with local access could leverage the information obtained from kernel memory to escalate privileges, potentially gaining root-level access. The CVSS score of 7.2 reflects a high severity, indicating that the vulnerability has a significant impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The attack vector is local (AV:L), requiring low attack complexity (AC:L) and no authentication (Au:N), meaning any local user can exploit it without prior credentials. Although no patches are available and no known exploits have been reported in the wild, the vulnerability remains a critical concern for systems still running these Solaris versions. Given the age of the affected versions, this vulnerability is primarily relevant to legacy systems that have not been updated or replaced. The lack of patch availability necessitates alternative mitigation strategies to reduce risk.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends largely on the presence of legacy Solaris systems within their IT infrastructure. Organizations in sectors such as telecommunications, finance, government, and critical infrastructure that historically relied on Solaris may still operate affected versions. Exploitation could lead to unauthorized root access, resulting in full system compromise, data breaches, and disruption of critical services. The confidentiality of sensitive data could be severely impacted, and the integrity and availability of systems could be compromised. This could lead to regulatory non-compliance, especially under GDPR, if personal data is exposed. Additionally, root access could allow attackers to establish persistent footholds, making incident response and recovery more difficult. The local attack vector limits exploitation to insiders or attackers who have already gained some level of access, but insider threats or attackers leveraging other vulnerabilities to gain initial access could exploit this vulnerability to escalate privileges.

Mitigation Recommendations

Given the absence of official patches, European organizations should prioritize the following mitigation strategies: 1) Identify and inventory all Solaris systems, especially those running affected versions, to assess exposure. 2) Where possible, upgrade or migrate legacy Solaris systems to supported versions or alternative platforms that receive security updates. 3) Restrict local access to Solaris systems by enforcing strict access controls, limiting user accounts with shell access, and employing the principle of least privilege. 4) Implement robust monitoring and auditing of local user activities to detect suspicious behavior indicative of exploitation attempts. 5) Employ host-based intrusion detection systems (HIDS) to monitor kernel memory access patterns and alert on anomalies. 6) Use virtualization or containerization to isolate legacy Solaris environments, reducing the risk of lateral movement. 7) Harden systems by disabling or restricting the use of the 'sysdef' command if feasible, or replacing it with safer alternatives. 8) Conduct regular security awareness training for administrators and users with local access to emphasize the risks of privilege escalation vulnerabilities. 9) Develop and test incident response plans specifically addressing potential exploitation scenarios involving local privilege escalation.

Need more detailed analysis?Upgrade to Pro Console

Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7de7fe

Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM

Last enriched: 6/30/2025, 12:55:14 PM

Last updated: 2/7/2026, 12:26:16 PM

Views: 41

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats