CVE-1999-0529: A router or firewall forwards packets that claim to come from IANA reserved or private addresses, e.
A router or firewall forwards packets that claim to come from IANA reserved or private addresses, e.g. 10.x.x.x, 127.x.x.x, 217.x.x.x, etc.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0529 describes a vulnerability in routers or firewalls where these devices improperly forward packets that claim to originate from IANA reserved or private IP address ranges, such as 10.x.x.x, 127.x.x.x, and other reserved blocks. Normally, packets with source addresses from these ranges should not appear on the public internet or be forwarded by perimeter devices because these addresses are meant for internal use or special purposes (e.g., loopback addresses). When a router or firewall forwards such packets, it enables IP address spoofing attacks, allowing an attacker to send packets that appear to come from trusted internal or reserved IP addresses. This can be exploited to bypass access controls, evade detection, or conduct man-in-the-middle attacks. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 7.5 (high severity), indicating network-level exploitation with no authentication required and impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Although published in 1999, this issue remains relevant in networks where filtering of spoofed packets is not properly implemented. The lack of available patches suggests the problem is more about configuration and best practices than software flaws. Effective mitigation requires strict ingress and egress filtering to block packets with source addresses from reserved or private IP ranges on interfaces connected to untrusted networks. This vulnerability is a classic example of IP spoofing facilitated by inadequate packet filtering on network perimeter devices.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability can have significant security implications. Attackers could exploit it to impersonate internal hosts or trusted network segments, potentially bypassing firewall rules and access controls. This could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive systems, data exfiltration, or disruption of services through denial-of-service attacks. Critical infrastructure operators, financial institutions, and government agencies in Europe are particularly at risk because they often rely on strict network segmentation and trust models based on IP addresses. The ability to spoof internal IP addresses could undermine these security assumptions, enabling lateral movement or targeted attacks. Additionally, the vulnerability could facilitate advanced persistent threats (APTs) that require stealthy network access. Given the interconnected nature of European networks and the emphasis on data protection under regulations like GDPR, exploitation could also result in regulatory penalties and reputational damage.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate this vulnerability, European organizations should implement strict ingress and egress filtering on all routers and firewalls, especially those at network boundaries. Specifically, configure devices to drop any incoming or outgoing packets with source IP addresses from IANA reserved or private ranges (e.g., 10.0.0.0/8, 127.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16) when these packets appear on interfaces connected to untrusted networks such as the internet. Employ Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) where supported to verify that incoming packets have source addresses reachable via the interface they arrive on. Regularly audit network device configurations to ensure compliance with anti-spoofing best practices. Network segmentation should be reinforced with additional authentication and encryption mechanisms rather than relying solely on IP address-based trust. Monitoring and alerting for anomalous traffic patterns involving reserved IP addresses can help detect attempts to exploit this vulnerability. Finally, ensure that network device firmware and software are up to date to benefit from any vendor-specific security enhancements.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Poland, Belgium, Sweden, Finland
CVE-1999-0529: A router or firewall forwards packets that claim to come from IANA reserved or private addresses, e.
Description
A router or firewall forwards packets that claim to come from IANA reserved or private addresses, e.g. 10.x.x.x, 127.x.x.x, 217.x.x.x, etc.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0529 describes a vulnerability in routers or firewalls where these devices improperly forward packets that claim to originate from IANA reserved or private IP address ranges, such as 10.x.x.x, 127.x.x.x, and other reserved blocks. Normally, packets with source addresses from these ranges should not appear on the public internet or be forwarded by perimeter devices because these addresses are meant for internal use or special purposes (e.g., loopback addresses). When a router or firewall forwards such packets, it enables IP address spoofing attacks, allowing an attacker to send packets that appear to come from trusted internal or reserved IP addresses. This can be exploited to bypass access controls, evade detection, or conduct man-in-the-middle attacks. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 7.5 (high severity), indicating network-level exploitation with no authentication required and impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Although published in 1999, this issue remains relevant in networks where filtering of spoofed packets is not properly implemented. The lack of available patches suggests the problem is more about configuration and best practices than software flaws. Effective mitigation requires strict ingress and egress filtering to block packets with source addresses from reserved or private IP ranges on interfaces connected to untrusted networks. This vulnerability is a classic example of IP spoofing facilitated by inadequate packet filtering on network perimeter devices.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability can have significant security implications. Attackers could exploit it to impersonate internal hosts or trusted network segments, potentially bypassing firewall rules and access controls. This could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive systems, data exfiltration, or disruption of services through denial-of-service attacks. Critical infrastructure operators, financial institutions, and government agencies in Europe are particularly at risk because they often rely on strict network segmentation and trust models based on IP addresses. The ability to spoof internal IP addresses could undermine these security assumptions, enabling lateral movement or targeted attacks. Additionally, the vulnerability could facilitate advanced persistent threats (APTs) that require stealthy network access. Given the interconnected nature of European networks and the emphasis on data protection under regulations like GDPR, exploitation could also result in regulatory penalties and reputational damage.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate this vulnerability, European organizations should implement strict ingress and egress filtering on all routers and firewalls, especially those at network boundaries. Specifically, configure devices to drop any incoming or outgoing packets with source IP addresses from IANA reserved or private ranges (e.g., 10.0.0.0/8, 127.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16) when these packets appear on interfaces connected to untrusted networks such as the internet. Employ Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) where supported to verify that incoming packets have source addresses reachable via the interface they arrive on. Regularly audit network device configurations to ensure compliance with anti-spoofing best practices. Network segmentation should be reinforced with additional authentication and encryption mechanisms rather than relying solely on IP address-based trust. Monitoring and alerting for anomalous traffic patterns involving reserved IP addresses can help detect attempts to exploit this vulnerability. Finally, ensure that network device firmware and software are up to date to benefit from any vendor-specific security enhancements.
Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7dec24
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM
Last enriched: 6/29/2025, 2:40:09 AM
Last updated: 2/6/2026, 7:46:46 PM
Views: 33
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-23989: CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization in opencloud-eu reva
HighCVE-2026-24418: CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in devcode-it openstamanager
HighCVE-2026-24417: CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in devcode-it openstamanager
HighCVE-2026-24416: CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in devcode-it openstamanager
HighCVE-2025-69216: CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in devcode-it openstamanager
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.