CVE-1999-0548: A superfluous NFS server is running, but it is not importing or exporting any file systems.
A superfluous NFS server is running, but it is not importing or exporting any file systems.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0548 describes a vulnerability where a Network File System (NFS) server is running on a system but is not actively exporting or importing any file systems. Despite the NFS server not sharing any resources, its mere presence and active listening on network ports can pose a significant security risk. The vulnerability is rated with a CVSS score of 10.0, indicating critical severity, with the vector AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C, meaning it is remotely exploitable over the network without authentication, requires low attack complexity, and can lead to complete confidentiality, integrity, and availability compromise. The core risk stems from the fact that an unnecessary NFS server increases the attack surface, potentially allowing attackers to exploit flaws in the NFS service or its underlying implementation to gain unauthorized access, execute arbitrary code, or cause denial of service. Although the server is not exporting file systems, vulnerabilities in the NFS daemon or related services could still be leveraged by attackers. Since this vulnerability dates back to 1999 and no patches are available, it likely relates to legacy systems or outdated configurations. The absence of file system exports does not guarantee safety; the running service itself can be a vector for reconnaissance or exploitation, especially in environments where network segmentation or firewall rules are insufficient. This vulnerability highlights the importance of minimizing exposed services to reduce attack surfaces, particularly for network-facing services like NFS that historically have had multiple security issues.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the presence of a superfluous NFS server running on networked systems can lead to severe security consequences. Attackers exploiting this vulnerability could gain unauthorized access to sensitive data, modify or delete critical files, or disrupt business operations through denial of service. Given the critical CVSS rating, exploitation could result in full system compromise without requiring authentication, posing a high risk to confidentiality, integrity, and availability. European enterprises in sectors such as finance, healthcare, manufacturing, and government, which often rely on legacy systems or have complex network environments, may be particularly vulnerable if NFS services are unnecessarily enabled. This could lead to data breaches involving personal data protected under GDPR, causing regulatory penalties and reputational damage. Additionally, disruption of critical infrastructure or services could have broader economic and societal impacts. The risk is heightened in environments lacking strict network segmentation or where legacy Unix/Linux systems are still in use without proper hardening. Attackers could leverage this vulnerability as an initial foothold or lateral movement vector within corporate networks.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate this vulnerability, European organizations should first conduct thorough network and system audits to identify any running NFS servers, especially those not actively exporting or importing file systems. Immediate steps include disabling the NFS server service on all systems where it is not explicitly required. For systems that must run NFS, ensure that exports are strictly controlled and limited to trusted hosts using export restrictions and access control lists. Network-level protections such as firewalls should block NFS-related ports (typically TCP/UDP 2049) from untrusted networks. Employ network segmentation to isolate legacy systems and reduce exposure. Regularly update and patch NFS implementations where possible, or consider migrating away from outdated NFS versions to more secure alternatives. Implement intrusion detection and prevention systems to monitor for suspicious NFS traffic or exploitation attempts. Finally, establish strict configuration management and change control processes to prevent unnecessary services from being enabled in production environments.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Poland, Belgium, Sweden, Finland
CVE-1999-0548: A superfluous NFS server is running, but it is not importing or exporting any file systems.
Description
A superfluous NFS server is running, but it is not importing or exporting any file systems.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0548 describes a vulnerability where a Network File System (NFS) server is running on a system but is not actively exporting or importing any file systems. Despite the NFS server not sharing any resources, its mere presence and active listening on network ports can pose a significant security risk. The vulnerability is rated with a CVSS score of 10.0, indicating critical severity, with the vector AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C, meaning it is remotely exploitable over the network without authentication, requires low attack complexity, and can lead to complete confidentiality, integrity, and availability compromise. The core risk stems from the fact that an unnecessary NFS server increases the attack surface, potentially allowing attackers to exploit flaws in the NFS service or its underlying implementation to gain unauthorized access, execute arbitrary code, or cause denial of service. Although the server is not exporting file systems, vulnerabilities in the NFS daemon or related services could still be leveraged by attackers. Since this vulnerability dates back to 1999 and no patches are available, it likely relates to legacy systems or outdated configurations. The absence of file system exports does not guarantee safety; the running service itself can be a vector for reconnaissance or exploitation, especially in environments where network segmentation or firewall rules are insufficient. This vulnerability highlights the importance of minimizing exposed services to reduce attack surfaces, particularly for network-facing services like NFS that historically have had multiple security issues.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the presence of a superfluous NFS server running on networked systems can lead to severe security consequences. Attackers exploiting this vulnerability could gain unauthorized access to sensitive data, modify or delete critical files, or disrupt business operations through denial of service. Given the critical CVSS rating, exploitation could result in full system compromise without requiring authentication, posing a high risk to confidentiality, integrity, and availability. European enterprises in sectors such as finance, healthcare, manufacturing, and government, which often rely on legacy systems or have complex network environments, may be particularly vulnerable if NFS services are unnecessarily enabled. This could lead to data breaches involving personal data protected under GDPR, causing regulatory penalties and reputational damage. Additionally, disruption of critical infrastructure or services could have broader economic and societal impacts. The risk is heightened in environments lacking strict network segmentation or where legacy Unix/Linux systems are still in use without proper hardening. Attackers could leverage this vulnerability as an initial foothold or lateral movement vector within corporate networks.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate this vulnerability, European organizations should first conduct thorough network and system audits to identify any running NFS servers, especially those not actively exporting or importing file systems. Immediate steps include disabling the NFS server service on all systems where it is not explicitly required. For systems that must run NFS, ensure that exports are strictly controlled and limited to trusted hosts using export restrictions and access control lists. Network-level protections such as firewalls should block NFS-related ports (typically TCP/UDP 2049) from untrusted networks. Employ network segmentation to isolate legacy systems and reduce exposure. Regularly update and patch NFS implementations where possible, or consider migrating away from outdated NFS versions to more secure alternatives. Implement intrusion detection and prevention systems to monitor for suspicious NFS traffic or exploitation attempts. Finally, establish strict configuration management and change control processes to prevent unnecessary services from being enabled in production environments.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7dec39
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM
Last enriched: 6/29/2025, 2:26:36 AM
Last updated: 8/8/2025, 9:26:10 AM
Views: 15
Related Threats
CVE-2025-8361: CWE-962 Missing Authorization in Drupal Config Pages
HighCVE-2025-8092: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in Drupal COOKiES Consent Management
HighCVE-2025-49897: CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in gopiplus Vertical scroll slideshow gallery v2
HighCVE-2025-24975: CWE-754: Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions in FirebirdSQL firebird
HighCVE-2025-5048: CWE-120 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') in Autodesk AutoCAD
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.