CVE-1999-0578: A Windows NT system's registry audit policy does not log an event success or failure for security-cr
A Windows NT system's registry audit policy does not log an event success or failure for security-critical registry keys.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0578 is a vulnerability identified in the Windows NT operating system related to its registry audit policy. Specifically, the system does not log success or failure events for security-critical registry keys. The Windows NT registry contains configuration settings essential for system operation and security. Audit policies are intended to track access and changes to sensitive parts of the system, including the registry, to detect unauthorized or malicious activity. However, due to this vulnerability, attempts to access or modify critical registry keys may not generate audit logs indicating success or failure. This lack of logging reduces visibility into potentially malicious activities targeting the registry, such as unauthorized privilege escalation or persistence mechanisms. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 4.6 (medium severity) with vector AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P, indicating that it requires local access, low attack complexity, no authentication, and impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability partially. No patches are available, and there are no known exploits in the wild. Given the age of the vulnerability (published in 1999) and the affected product (Windows NT), this issue primarily concerns legacy systems still in operation. Modern Windows versions have improved auditing capabilities and likely do not suffer from this exact issue.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability is primarily relevant if legacy Windows NT systems remain in use, which is uncommon but possible in certain industrial control systems, legacy applications, or isolated environments. The inability to log security-critical registry access events reduces the effectiveness of security monitoring and incident response, potentially allowing attackers or malicious insiders to modify critical system settings without detection. This can lead to unauthorized privilege escalation, persistence, or system compromise. However, since exploitation requires local access and no known exploits exist, the immediate risk is limited. Organizations relying on Windows NT systems may face compliance challenges due to insufficient audit trails, which can impact regulatory requirements such as GDPR that emphasize security monitoring and incident detection.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given that no patches are available for this vulnerability, mitigation focuses on compensating controls. Organizations should: 1) Identify and inventory any remaining Windows NT systems and assess their criticality and exposure. 2) Isolate legacy systems from general network access to reduce the risk of local exploitation. 3) Implement strict access controls and physical security to prevent unauthorized local access. 4) Use host-based intrusion detection systems (HIDS) or endpoint monitoring tools that can detect anomalous behavior beyond native audit logs. 5) Plan and execute migration strategies to modern supported operating systems with enhanced security and auditing capabilities. 6) Regularly review and monitor logs from other sources (e.g., application logs, network logs) to detect suspicious activity around legacy systems. 7) Enforce strong authentication and authorization policies to limit user privileges on legacy systems.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Poland, Belgium, Sweden, Finland
CVE-1999-0578: A Windows NT system's registry audit policy does not log an event success or failure for security-cr
Description
A Windows NT system's registry audit policy does not log an event success or failure for security-critical registry keys.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0578 is a vulnerability identified in the Windows NT operating system related to its registry audit policy. Specifically, the system does not log success or failure events for security-critical registry keys. The Windows NT registry contains configuration settings essential for system operation and security. Audit policies are intended to track access and changes to sensitive parts of the system, including the registry, to detect unauthorized or malicious activity. However, due to this vulnerability, attempts to access or modify critical registry keys may not generate audit logs indicating success or failure. This lack of logging reduces visibility into potentially malicious activities targeting the registry, such as unauthorized privilege escalation or persistence mechanisms. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 4.6 (medium severity) with vector AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P, indicating that it requires local access, low attack complexity, no authentication, and impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability partially. No patches are available, and there are no known exploits in the wild. Given the age of the vulnerability (published in 1999) and the affected product (Windows NT), this issue primarily concerns legacy systems still in operation. Modern Windows versions have improved auditing capabilities and likely do not suffer from this exact issue.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability is primarily relevant if legacy Windows NT systems remain in use, which is uncommon but possible in certain industrial control systems, legacy applications, or isolated environments. The inability to log security-critical registry access events reduces the effectiveness of security monitoring and incident response, potentially allowing attackers or malicious insiders to modify critical system settings without detection. This can lead to unauthorized privilege escalation, persistence, or system compromise. However, since exploitation requires local access and no known exploits exist, the immediate risk is limited. Organizations relying on Windows NT systems may face compliance challenges due to insufficient audit trails, which can impact regulatory requirements such as GDPR that emphasize security monitoring and incident detection.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given that no patches are available for this vulnerability, mitigation focuses on compensating controls. Organizations should: 1) Identify and inventory any remaining Windows NT systems and assess their criticality and exposure. 2) Isolate legacy systems from general network access to reduce the risk of local exploitation. 3) Implement strict access controls and physical security to prevent unauthorized local access. 4) Use host-based intrusion detection systems (HIDS) or endpoint monitoring tools that can detect anomalous behavior beyond native audit logs. 5) Plan and execute migration strategies to modern supported operating systems with enhanced security and auditing capabilities. 6) Regularly review and monitor logs from other sources (e.g., application logs, network logs) to detect suspicious activity around legacy systems. 7) Enforce strong authentication and authorization policies to limit user privileges on legacy systems.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7dec62
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 8:56:06 PM
Last updated: 8/11/2025, 5:44:48 AM
Views: 12
Related Threats
CVE-2025-8976: Cross Site Scripting in givanz Vvveb
MediumCVE-2025-8975: Cross Site Scripting in givanz Vvveb
MediumCVE-2025-55716: CWE-862 Missing Authorization in VeronaLabs WP Statistics
MediumCVE-2025-55714: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in Crocoblock JetElements For Elementor
MediumCVE-2025-55713: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in CreativeThemes Blocksy
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.