CVE-1999-0596: A Windows NT log file has an inappropriate maximum size or retention period.
A Windows NT log file has an inappropriate maximum size or retention period.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0596 is a vulnerability identified in Windows NT systems related to the configuration of log files, specifically concerning their maximum size or retention period. The issue arises when a Windows NT log file is configured with an inappropriate maximum size or retention period, which can lead to critical security implications. Log files are essential for auditing, forensic analysis, and system monitoring. If the log files are too small or have a retention period that is too short, important security events may be overwritten or lost before they can be reviewed. This can result in the inability to detect or investigate malicious activities, thereby compromising the integrity and availability of audit trails. The CVSS score of 10.0 (critical) with vector AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C indicates that this vulnerability can be exploited remotely without authentication, and it impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability severely. An attacker could potentially exploit this by causing log files to roll over or be deleted prematurely, effectively erasing traces of their activities or causing denial of service by filling up disk space or disabling logging mechanisms. Although this vulnerability dates back to 1999 and affects Windows NT, which is an outdated operating system, it remains relevant in legacy environments where such systems might still be in use. No patches are available, and no known exploits have been reported in the wild, but the risk remains high due to the critical nature of log integrity in security operations.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-1999-0596 can be significant, particularly for those still operating legacy Windows NT systems in critical infrastructure, industrial control systems, or specialized environments. Loss or premature deletion of log data undermines incident response capabilities, compliance with regulations such as GDPR (which mandates proper logging and audit trails), and forensic investigations. This can lead to undetected breaches, data exfiltration, or prolonged attacker presence. Additionally, the inability to maintain reliable logs can result in non-compliance penalties and reputational damage. Organizations relying on Windows NT systems for legacy applications or embedded systems may face operational disruptions if attackers exploit this vulnerability to disable logging or cause system instability. Although modern Windows versions have addressed such issues, the presence of legacy systems in some European sectors (e.g., manufacturing, utilities) means the threat remains relevant.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given the absence of patches, mitigation must focus on compensating controls. Organizations should: 1) Identify and inventory all Windows NT systems and assess their role and exposure. 2) Where possible, upgrade or migrate legacy systems to supported Windows versions with improved logging controls. 3) Implement centralized logging solutions that collect and archive logs off the vulnerable system to prevent loss due to local log file misconfiguration or tampering. 4) Configure log file sizes and retention policies conservatively to ensure logs are retained long enough for analysis, and monitor log file sizes and rotation events actively. 5) Employ file integrity monitoring on log files to detect unauthorized modifications or deletions. 6) Restrict network access to legacy Windows NT systems to trusted administrators only, minimizing remote exploitation risk. 7) Regularly back up logs and system states to secure, immutable storage. 8) Enhance monitoring and alerting for suspicious activities that might indicate attempts to erase or manipulate logs. These steps help mitigate the risk despite the lack of direct patches.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Poland, Netherlands
CVE-1999-0596: A Windows NT log file has an inappropriate maximum size or retention period.
Description
A Windows NT log file has an inappropriate maximum size or retention period.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0596 is a vulnerability identified in Windows NT systems related to the configuration of log files, specifically concerning their maximum size or retention period. The issue arises when a Windows NT log file is configured with an inappropriate maximum size or retention period, which can lead to critical security implications. Log files are essential for auditing, forensic analysis, and system monitoring. If the log files are too small or have a retention period that is too short, important security events may be overwritten or lost before they can be reviewed. This can result in the inability to detect or investigate malicious activities, thereby compromising the integrity and availability of audit trails. The CVSS score of 10.0 (critical) with vector AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C indicates that this vulnerability can be exploited remotely without authentication, and it impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability severely. An attacker could potentially exploit this by causing log files to roll over or be deleted prematurely, effectively erasing traces of their activities or causing denial of service by filling up disk space or disabling logging mechanisms. Although this vulnerability dates back to 1999 and affects Windows NT, which is an outdated operating system, it remains relevant in legacy environments where such systems might still be in use. No patches are available, and no known exploits have been reported in the wild, but the risk remains high due to the critical nature of log integrity in security operations.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-1999-0596 can be significant, particularly for those still operating legacy Windows NT systems in critical infrastructure, industrial control systems, or specialized environments. Loss or premature deletion of log data undermines incident response capabilities, compliance with regulations such as GDPR (which mandates proper logging and audit trails), and forensic investigations. This can lead to undetected breaches, data exfiltration, or prolonged attacker presence. Additionally, the inability to maintain reliable logs can result in non-compliance penalties and reputational damage. Organizations relying on Windows NT systems for legacy applications or embedded systems may face operational disruptions if attackers exploit this vulnerability to disable logging or cause system instability. Although modern Windows versions have addressed such issues, the presence of legacy systems in some European sectors (e.g., manufacturing, utilities) means the threat remains relevant.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given the absence of patches, mitigation must focus on compensating controls. Organizations should: 1) Identify and inventory all Windows NT systems and assess their role and exposure. 2) Where possible, upgrade or migrate legacy systems to supported Windows versions with improved logging controls. 3) Implement centralized logging solutions that collect and archive logs off the vulnerable system to prevent loss due to local log file misconfiguration or tampering. 4) Configure log file sizes and retention policies conservatively to ensure logs are retained long enough for analysis, and monitor log file sizes and rotation events actively. 5) Employ file integrity monitoring on log files to detect unauthorized modifications or deletions. 6) Restrict network access to legacy Windows NT systems to trusted administrators only, minimizing remote exploitation risk. 7) Regularly back up logs and system states to secure, immutable storage. 8) Enhance monitoring and alerting for suspicious activities that might indicate attempts to erase or manipulate logs. These steps help mitigate the risk despite the lack of direct patches.
Affected Countries
Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7dec94
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM
Last enriched: 6/28/2025, 8:57:06 PM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 7:41:55 AM
Views: 30
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-15491: CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in Post Slides
HighCVE-2026-2071: Buffer Overflow in UTT 进取 520W
HighCVE-2026-25762: CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in adonisjs core
HighCVE-2026-25754: CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') in adonisjs core
HighCVE-2026-25644: CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation in datahub-project datahub
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.