Skip to main content

CVE-1999-0660: Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is not

Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-1999-0660cve-1999-0660
Published: Fri Jan 01 1999 (01/01/1999, 05:00:00 UTC)
Source: NVD

Description

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is not about any specific product, protocol, or design, so it is out of scope of CVE. It might be more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "A hacker utility, back door, or Trojan Horse is installed on a system, e.g. NetBus, Back Orifice, Rootkit, etc.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 07/01/2025, 20:24:57 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-1999-0660 is a rejected candidate vulnerability entry originally intended to describe the presence of hacker utilities, backdoors, or Trojan horses installed on systems, such as NetBus, Back Orifice, or rootkits. However, this candidate was rejected because it does not pertain to any specific product, protocol, or design, and thus falls outside the scope of the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) system. Instead, it is suggested that such issues be addressed under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE), which focuses on configuration issues rather than software flaws. The original description implied that the threat involves unauthorized installation of malicious software that can provide attackers with remote control or stealthy access to compromised systems. These types of threats typically allow attackers to bypass normal authentication, maintain persistence, and potentially exfiltrate data or disrupt system operations. Although this entry is not an active CVE and lacks specific technical details, the underlying concept remains relevant: the presence of backdoors and Trojan horses on systems represents a significant security risk. Such malware often exploits weak security controls, social engineering, or unpatched vulnerabilities to gain initial access and then installs tools to maintain control. The lack of a patch or direct remediation for this entry reflects that it is a classification issue rather than a specific vulnerability. Organizations must therefore focus on detection, prevention, and response strategies to mitigate risks from these types of threats.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the presence of backdoors, Trojan horses, or rootkits on systems can have severe consequences. These threats can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data, intellectual property theft, disruption of critical services, and potential compliance violations under regulations such as GDPR. The stealthy nature of rootkits and backdoors complicates detection, increasing the risk of prolonged compromise and data exfiltration. In sectors such as finance, healthcare, energy, and government, where confidentiality and availability are paramount, such infections can undermine trust, cause financial losses, and even threaten national security. Additionally, the use of such malware by advanced persistent threat (APT) groups targeting European entities can exacerbate geopolitical tensions and increase the likelihood of targeted cyber espionage or sabotage. The medium severity rating reflects that while the threat is serious, it is not tied to a specific vulnerability with a known exploit, making the risk dependent on the presence of malware rather than a direct software flaw.

Mitigation Recommendations

To mitigate risks associated with backdoors, Trojan horses, and rootkits, European organizations should implement a multi-layered security approach: 1. Employ advanced endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools capable of identifying anomalous behaviors indicative of backdoors or rootkits, including kernel-level monitoring. 2. Maintain strict access controls and enforce the principle of least privilege to limit the ability of malware to install or persist. 3. Regularly update and patch all software and operating systems to reduce the attack surface exploited by initial infection vectors. 4. Conduct frequent integrity checks and use trusted boot mechanisms to detect unauthorized modifications to system binaries or configurations. 5. Implement network segmentation and monitor network traffic for unusual outbound connections that may indicate command and control communications. 6. Provide user training to reduce the risk of social engineering attacks that often lead to initial compromise. 7. Develop and regularly test incident response plans specifically addressing malware infections and persistence mechanisms. 8. Utilize threat intelligence feeds to stay informed about emerging backdoor and rootkit variants targeting relevant sectors. These measures go beyond generic advice by emphasizing detection of stealthy malware components and organizational preparedness.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7ded35

Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM

Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 8:24:57 PM

Last updated: 8/1/2025, 7:19:31 AM

Views: 11

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats