CVE-1999-0672: Buffer overflow in Fujitsu Chocoa IRC client via IRC channel topics.
Buffer overflow in Fujitsu Chocoa IRC client via IRC channel topics.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0672 is a buffer overflow vulnerability found in the Fujitsu Chocoa IRC client, specifically in version 1.0beta7r. The flaw arises when the client processes IRC channel topics, which are text strings that describe or label IRC channels. Due to improper bounds checking on the length of these topic strings, an attacker can craft a maliciously long topic message that overflows the allocated buffer in the client’s memory. This overflow can overwrite adjacent memory, potentially allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code, crash the client, or cause denial of service. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable over the network without requiring authentication or user interaction beyond joining or viewing a compromised IRC channel. The CVSS v2 base score is 5.1 (medium severity), reflecting that the attack vector is network-based (AV:N), requires high attack complexity (AC:H), no authentication (Au:N), and impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:P/I:P/A:P). No patches or fixes are available, and there are no known exploits in the wild. Given the age of the vulnerability (published in 1999) and the specific affected product (an IRC client), exploitation today would require targeting legacy systems still running this outdated software. However, the fundamental risk remains that a malicious IRC channel operator or attacker who can inject topic messages could exploit this flaw to compromise vulnerable clients.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability is generally low in modern contexts due to the obsolescence of the Fujitsu Chocoa IRC client and the niche use of IRC as a communication platform. However, organizations that maintain legacy systems or specialized environments where this client is still in use could face significant risks. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized code execution on user machines, potentially allowing attackers to gain access to sensitive information, disrupt communications, or pivot further into internal networks. This is particularly relevant for sectors relying on IRC for legacy communications or internal chat systems, such as certain research institutions or industrial control environments. The lack of patches means that vulnerable systems remain exposed unless mitigated by other controls. Additionally, the medium CVSS score suggests a moderate risk level, but the high attack complexity and absence of known exploits reduce the likelihood of widespread attacks. Nonetheless, any compromise could impact confidentiality, integrity, and availability of affected systems.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given the absence of official patches, European organizations should prioritize the following mitigations: 1) Identify and inventory any use of the Fujitsu Chocoa IRC client, especially version 1.0beta7r, within their environments. 2) Where possible, discontinue use of this client and replace it with modern, actively maintained IRC clients that have robust security controls. 3) If legacy use is unavoidable, restrict network access to IRC servers and channels to trusted users and isolate these systems within segmented network zones to limit exposure. 4) Employ intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) with signatures or anomaly detection for suspicious IRC traffic, particularly monitoring for unusually long channel topic messages. 5) Educate users about the risks of joining untrusted IRC channels and encourage caution when interacting with channel topics. 6) Implement endpoint protection solutions capable of detecting exploitation attempts or anomalous behavior resulting from buffer overflow attacks. 7) Regularly review and update network firewall rules to limit IRC traffic to authorized endpoints and servers. These steps collectively reduce the attack surface and mitigate the risk posed by this vulnerability in the absence of a patch.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden
CVE-1999-0672: Buffer overflow in Fujitsu Chocoa IRC client via IRC channel topics.
Description
Buffer overflow in Fujitsu Chocoa IRC client via IRC channel topics.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0672 is a buffer overflow vulnerability found in the Fujitsu Chocoa IRC client, specifically in version 1.0beta7r. The flaw arises when the client processes IRC channel topics, which are text strings that describe or label IRC channels. Due to improper bounds checking on the length of these topic strings, an attacker can craft a maliciously long topic message that overflows the allocated buffer in the client’s memory. This overflow can overwrite adjacent memory, potentially allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code, crash the client, or cause denial of service. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable over the network without requiring authentication or user interaction beyond joining or viewing a compromised IRC channel. The CVSS v2 base score is 5.1 (medium severity), reflecting that the attack vector is network-based (AV:N), requires high attack complexity (AC:H), no authentication (Au:N), and impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:P/I:P/A:P). No patches or fixes are available, and there are no known exploits in the wild. Given the age of the vulnerability (published in 1999) and the specific affected product (an IRC client), exploitation today would require targeting legacy systems still running this outdated software. However, the fundamental risk remains that a malicious IRC channel operator or attacker who can inject topic messages could exploit this flaw to compromise vulnerable clients.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability is generally low in modern contexts due to the obsolescence of the Fujitsu Chocoa IRC client and the niche use of IRC as a communication platform. However, organizations that maintain legacy systems or specialized environments where this client is still in use could face significant risks. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized code execution on user machines, potentially allowing attackers to gain access to sensitive information, disrupt communications, or pivot further into internal networks. This is particularly relevant for sectors relying on IRC for legacy communications or internal chat systems, such as certain research institutions or industrial control environments. The lack of patches means that vulnerable systems remain exposed unless mitigated by other controls. Additionally, the medium CVSS score suggests a moderate risk level, but the high attack complexity and absence of known exploits reduce the likelihood of widespread attacks. Nonetheless, any compromise could impact confidentiality, integrity, and availability of affected systems.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given the absence of official patches, European organizations should prioritize the following mitigations: 1) Identify and inventory any use of the Fujitsu Chocoa IRC client, especially version 1.0beta7r, within their environments. 2) Where possible, discontinue use of this client and replace it with modern, actively maintained IRC clients that have robust security controls. 3) If legacy use is unavoidable, restrict network access to IRC servers and channels to trusted users and isolate these systems within segmented network zones to limit exposure. 4) Employ intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) with signatures or anomaly detection for suspicious IRC traffic, particularly monitoring for unusually long channel topic messages. 5) Educate users about the risks of joining untrusted IRC channels and encourage caution when interacting with channel topics. 6) Implement endpoint protection solutions capable of detecting exploitation attempts or anomalous behavior resulting from buffer overflow attacks. 7) Regularly review and update network firewall rules to limit IRC traffic to authorized endpoints and servers. These steps collectively reduce the attack surface and mitigate the risk posed by this vulnerability in the absence of a patch.
Affected Countries
Threat ID: 682ca32cb6fd31d6ed7df136
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:40 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 4:40:05 PM
Last updated: 2/3/2026, 9:03:28 PM
Views: 33
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-65081: CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read in Lexmark MXTCT, MSNGM, MSTGM, MXNGM, MXTGM, CSNGV, CSTGV, CXTGV, MSNGW, MSTGW, MXTGW, CSTLS, CXTLS, MXTLS, CSTMM, CXTMM, CSTPC, CXTPC, MXTPM, MSNSN, MSTSN, MXTSN, CSNZJ, CSTZJ, CXNZJ, CXTZJ
MediumCVE-2025-65080: CWE-843 Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') in Lexmark MXTCT, MSNGM, MSTGM, MXNGM, MXTGM, CSNGV, CSTGV, CXTGV, MSNGW, MSTGW, MXTGW, CSTLS, CXTLS, MXTLS, CSTMM, CXTMM, CSTPC, CXTPC, MXTPM, MSNSN, MSTSN, MXTSN, CSNZJ, CSTZJ, CXNZJ, CXTZJ
MediumCVE-2026-1810: Path Traversal in bolo-blog bolo-solo
MediumCVE-2025-65079: CWE-122 Heap-based Buffer Overflow in Lexmark MXTCT, MSNGM, MSTGM, MXNGM, MXTGM, CSNGV, CSTGV, CXTGV, MSNGW, MSTGW, MXTGW, CSTLS, CXTLS, MXTLS, CSTMM, CXTMM, CSTPC, CXTPC, MXTPM, MSNSN, MSTSN, MXTSN, CSNZJ, CSTZJ, CXNZJ, CXTZJ
MediumCVE-2026-1801: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') in Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.