CVE-1999-0878: Buffer overflow in WU-FTPD and related FTP servers allows remote attackers to gain root privileges v
Buffer overflow in WU-FTPD and related FTP servers allows remote attackers to gain root privileges via MAPPING_CHDIR.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0878 is a critical buffer overflow vulnerability found in WU-FTPD and related FTP server implementations, specifically affecting versions of beroftpd ranging from 1.3.2 through 2.5 and multiple beta versions of 2.4.2. The vulnerability arises due to improper handling of the MAPPING_CHDIR command, which allows a remote attacker to send specially crafted input that overflows a buffer in the FTP server process. This overflow can overwrite memory, enabling the attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges on the affected system. The vulnerability requires no authentication and can be exploited remotely over the network, making it highly dangerous. The CVSS v2 score is 10.0, indicating maximum severity with network attack vector, low attack complexity, no authentication required, and full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Given the age of the vulnerability (published in 1999) and the lack of available patches, systems running these outdated FTP servers remain at risk if still operational. The exploitation of this vulnerability can lead to complete system compromise, allowing attackers to gain root-level control, potentially leading to data theft, system manipulation, or use of the compromised host as a pivot point for further attacks.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability can be severe if legacy systems running vulnerable versions of beroftpd or WU-FTPD are still in use. Compromise of FTP servers can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data, disruption of services, and potential lateral movement within corporate networks. Critical infrastructure, government agencies, and enterprises relying on FTP for file transfers could face data breaches or operational outages. The root-level access gained by attackers could also facilitate installation of persistent backdoors, further increasing long-term risk. Although modern systems have largely replaced these outdated FTP servers, some legacy environments in Europe—especially in sectors with long upgrade cycles such as manufacturing, utilities, or public administration—may still be vulnerable. The lack of patches means organizations must rely on mitigation and replacement strategies to reduce risk.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given that no official patches are available for this vulnerability, European organizations should prioritize the following mitigations: 1) Immediate identification and inventory of all FTP servers running beroftpd or WU-FTPD versions listed as vulnerable. 2) Decommission or upgrade these FTP servers to modern, actively maintained FTP server software that does not contain this vulnerability. 3) If upgrading is not immediately feasible, restrict network access to the vulnerable FTP servers by implementing strict firewall rules limiting connections to trusted hosts only. 4) Employ network intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) with signatures capable of detecting exploitation attempts targeting MAPPING_CHDIR buffer overflow. 5) Monitor logs for unusual FTP activity indicative of exploitation attempts. 6) Consider disabling FTP services entirely in favor of more secure file transfer protocols such as SFTP or FTPS. 7) Implement network segmentation to isolate legacy FTP servers from critical assets. 8) Conduct regular security audits and penetration tests to verify that no vulnerable FTP servers remain exposed.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Poland, Belgium, Sweden, Czech Republic
CVE-1999-0878: Buffer overflow in WU-FTPD and related FTP servers allows remote attackers to gain root privileges v
Description
Buffer overflow in WU-FTPD and related FTP servers allows remote attackers to gain root privileges via MAPPING_CHDIR.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0878 is a critical buffer overflow vulnerability found in WU-FTPD and related FTP server implementations, specifically affecting versions of beroftpd ranging from 1.3.2 through 2.5 and multiple beta versions of 2.4.2. The vulnerability arises due to improper handling of the MAPPING_CHDIR command, which allows a remote attacker to send specially crafted input that overflows a buffer in the FTP server process. This overflow can overwrite memory, enabling the attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges on the affected system. The vulnerability requires no authentication and can be exploited remotely over the network, making it highly dangerous. The CVSS v2 score is 10.0, indicating maximum severity with network attack vector, low attack complexity, no authentication required, and full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Given the age of the vulnerability (published in 1999) and the lack of available patches, systems running these outdated FTP servers remain at risk if still operational. The exploitation of this vulnerability can lead to complete system compromise, allowing attackers to gain root-level control, potentially leading to data theft, system manipulation, or use of the compromised host as a pivot point for further attacks.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability can be severe if legacy systems running vulnerable versions of beroftpd or WU-FTPD are still in use. Compromise of FTP servers can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data, disruption of services, and potential lateral movement within corporate networks. Critical infrastructure, government agencies, and enterprises relying on FTP for file transfers could face data breaches or operational outages. The root-level access gained by attackers could also facilitate installation of persistent backdoors, further increasing long-term risk. Although modern systems have largely replaced these outdated FTP servers, some legacy environments in Europe—especially in sectors with long upgrade cycles such as manufacturing, utilities, or public administration—may still be vulnerable. The lack of patches means organizations must rely on mitigation and replacement strategies to reduce risk.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given that no official patches are available for this vulnerability, European organizations should prioritize the following mitigations: 1) Immediate identification and inventory of all FTP servers running beroftpd or WU-FTPD versions listed as vulnerable. 2) Decommission or upgrade these FTP servers to modern, actively maintained FTP server software that does not contain this vulnerability. 3) If upgrading is not immediately feasible, restrict network access to the vulnerable FTP servers by implementing strict firewall rules limiting connections to trusted hosts only. 4) Employ network intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) with signatures capable of detecting exploitation attempts targeting MAPPING_CHDIR buffer overflow. 5) Monitor logs for unusual FTP activity indicative of exploitation attempts. 6) Consider disabling FTP services entirely in favor of more secure file transfer protocols such as SFTP or FTPS. 7) Implement network segmentation to isolate legacy FTP servers from critical assets. 8) Conduct regular security audits and penetration tests to verify that no vulnerable FTP servers remain exposed.
Threat ID: 682ca32cb6fd31d6ed7df1b8
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:40 PM
Last enriched: 6/27/2025, 5:54:42 PM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 1:02:34 PM
Views: 38
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-2085: Command Injection in D-Link DWR-M921
HighCVE-2026-2084: OS Command Injection in D-Link DIR-823X
HighCVE-2026-2080: Command Injection in UTT HiPER 810
HighCVE-2025-68621: CWE-208: Observable Timing Discrepancy in TriliumNext Trilium
HighCVE-2026-2071: Buffer Overflow in UTT 进取 520W
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.