CVE-1999-0964: Buffer overflow in FreeBSD setlocale in the libc module allows attackers to execute arbitrary code v
Buffer overflow in FreeBSD setlocale in the libc module allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long PATH_LOCALE environment variable.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0964 is a high-severity buffer overflow vulnerability found in the FreeBSD operating system, specifically within the setlocale function of the libc module. The vulnerability arises when the setlocale function processes the PATH_LOCALE environment variable. If an attacker supplies an excessively long string in this environment variable, it causes a buffer overflow, which can overwrite adjacent memory. This memory corruption can be exploited to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the affected process. The vulnerability affects FreeBSD version 2.1.6, an older release of the operating system. The attack vector requires local access (AV:L), meaning the attacker must have the ability to execute code or commands on the target system locally. The attack complexity is low (AC:L), no authentication is required (Au:N), and the impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is complete (C:C/I:C/A:C), making it a critical risk if exploited. Despite the high severity, there are no known exploits in the wild and no patches available for this specific version, likely due to its age and obsolescence. The vulnerability is rooted in unsafe handling of environment variables leading to classic stack-based buffer overflow, a common issue in legacy C codebases. Given the age of the affected version, modern FreeBSD releases have likely addressed this issue, but legacy systems running 2.1.6 remain vulnerable.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends largely on the presence of legacy FreeBSD 2.1.6 systems within their infrastructure. If such systems are in use, attackers with local access could leverage this vulnerability to gain arbitrary code execution, potentially leading to full system compromise. This could result in unauthorized data access, system manipulation, or disruption of critical services. Given the complete compromise potential (confidentiality, integrity, availability), sensitive data could be exfiltrated or destroyed, and operational continuity could be severely affected. However, the requirement for local access limits remote exploitation, reducing the risk from external attackers unless combined with other vulnerabilities or social engineering to gain initial access. European organizations relying on legacy FreeBSD systems in critical infrastructure, research, or specialized industrial environments may face higher risks. The lack of patches means mitigation relies on system upgrades or other compensating controls. Overall, while the direct threat is limited by the need for local access and the obsolescence of the affected version, the potential impact on legacy systems remains significant.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Upgrade: The primary mitigation is to upgrade affected FreeBSD systems from version 2.1.6 to a supported, modern release where this vulnerability is resolved. 2. Access Control: Restrict local access to systems running legacy FreeBSD versions by enforcing strict user authentication, limiting physical and remote console access, and employing network segmentation to isolate vulnerable hosts. 3. Environment Variable Sanitization: Implement wrappers or security policies that sanitize or restrict environment variables such as PATH_LOCALE to prevent injection of overly long strings. 4. Monitoring and Detection: Deploy host-based intrusion detection systems (HIDS) to monitor for anomalous behavior indicative of exploitation attempts, such as unusual environment variable settings or unexpected process executions. 5. Application Hardening: Where upgrading is not immediately feasible, consider recompiling libc with stack protection mechanisms (e.g., stack canaries) if supported, or applying custom patches to limit buffer sizes. 6. Incident Response Preparedness: Prepare incident response plans specifically for legacy system compromise scenarios, including data backup and recovery strategies. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on compensating controls suitable for legacy environments where patching is not possible.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland
CVE-1999-0964: Buffer overflow in FreeBSD setlocale in the libc module allows attackers to execute arbitrary code v
Description
Buffer overflow in FreeBSD setlocale in the libc module allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long PATH_LOCALE environment variable.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0964 is a high-severity buffer overflow vulnerability found in the FreeBSD operating system, specifically within the setlocale function of the libc module. The vulnerability arises when the setlocale function processes the PATH_LOCALE environment variable. If an attacker supplies an excessively long string in this environment variable, it causes a buffer overflow, which can overwrite adjacent memory. This memory corruption can be exploited to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the affected process. The vulnerability affects FreeBSD version 2.1.6, an older release of the operating system. The attack vector requires local access (AV:L), meaning the attacker must have the ability to execute code or commands on the target system locally. The attack complexity is low (AC:L), no authentication is required (Au:N), and the impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is complete (C:C/I:C/A:C), making it a critical risk if exploited. Despite the high severity, there are no known exploits in the wild and no patches available for this specific version, likely due to its age and obsolescence. The vulnerability is rooted in unsafe handling of environment variables leading to classic stack-based buffer overflow, a common issue in legacy C codebases. Given the age of the affected version, modern FreeBSD releases have likely addressed this issue, but legacy systems running 2.1.6 remain vulnerable.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends largely on the presence of legacy FreeBSD 2.1.6 systems within their infrastructure. If such systems are in use, attackers with local access could leverage this vulnerability to gain arbitrary code execution, potentially leading to full system compromise. This could result in unauthorized data access, system manipulation, or disruption of critical services. Given the complete compromise potential (confidentiality, integrity, availability), sensitive data could be exfiltrated or destroyed, and operational continuity could be severely affected. However, the requirement for local access limits remote exploitation, reducing the risk from external attackers unless combined with other vulnerabilities or social engineering to gain initial access. European organizations relying on legacy FreeBSD systems in critical infrastructure, research, or specialized industrial environments may face higher risks. The lack of patches means mitigation relies on system upgrades or other compensating controls. Overall, while the direct threat is limited by the need for local access and the obsolescence of the affected version, the potential impact on legacy systems remains significant.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Upgrade: The primary mitigation is to upgrade affected FreeBSD systems from version 2.1.6 to a supported, modern release where this vulnerability is resolved. 2. Access Control: Restrict local access to systems running legacy FreeBSD versions by enforcing strict user authentication, limiting physical and remote console access, and employing network segmentation to isolate vulnerable hosts. 3. Environment Variable Sanitization: Implement wrappers or security policies that sanitize or restrict environment variables such as PATH_LOCALE to prevent injection of overly long strings. 4. Monitoring and Detection: Deploy host-based intrusion detection systems (HIDS) to monitor for anomalous behavior indicative of exploitation attempts, such as unusual environment variable settings or unexpected process executions. 5. Application Hardening: Where upgrading is not immediately feasible, consider recompiling libc with stack protection mechanisms (e.g., stack canaries) if supported, or applying custom patches to limit buffer sizes. 6. Incident Response Preparedness: Prepare incident response plans specifically for legacy system compromise scenarios, including data backup and recovery strategies. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on compensating controls suitable for legacy environments where patching is not possible.
Affected Countries
Threat ID: 682ca32db6fd31d6ed7df6ca
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:41 PM
Last enriched: 6/25/2025, 3:30:31 PM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 6:51:51 AM
Views: 35
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-15491: CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in Post Slides
HighCVE-2026-2071: Buffer Overflow in UTT 进取 520W
HighCVE-2026-25762: CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in adonisjs core
HighCVE-2026-25754: CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') in adonisjs core
HighCVE-2026-25644: CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation in datahub-project datahub
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.