Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-1999-1153: HAMcards Postcard CGI script 1.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell met

0
High
VulnerabilityCVE-1999-1153cve-1999-1153
Published: Mon Nov 09 1998 (11/09/1998, 05:00:00 UTC)
Source: NVD
Vendor/Project: hamcards_postcard_cgi
Product: hamcards_postcard_cgi

Description

HAMcards Postcard CGI script 1.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the recipient email address.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 06/29/2025, 12:25:10 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-1999-1153 is a high-severity remote code execution vulnerability found in HAMcards Postcard CGI script version 1.0. This CGI script, designed to send electronic postcards, improperly handles user input in the recipient email address field. Specifically, it fails to sanitize shell metacharacters, allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary commands that the server executes with the privileges of the web server process. The vulnerability arises from the script passing user-supplied input directly to a shell command without adequate validation or escaping. Exploitation requires no authentication and can be performed remotely over the network, making it highly accessible to attackers. The CVSS v2 base score of 7.5 reflects the ease of exploitation (low attack complexity), no authentication requirement, and the potential for full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system. Although this vulnerability dates back to 1998 and no patches are available, it remains a critical example of command injection risks in legacy CGI scripts. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, but the vulnerability's nature means it could be leveraged to execute arbitrary commands, potentially leading to system takeover, data theft, or service disruption.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends largely on whether legacy systems still run HAMcards Postcard CGI script version 1.0 or similar vulnerable CGI scripts. If present, exploitation could lead to full compromise of affected web servers, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary commands, steal sensitive data, modify or delete information, or disrupt services. This could affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability of critical systems, potentially leading to data breaches, reputational damage, regulatory penalties under GDPR, and operational downtime. Given the age of the vulnerability, it is unlikely to affect modern systems, but organizations with legacy infrastructure or insufficient patch management may remain at risk. The lack of available patches means mitigation relies on removing or isolating the vulnerable component. European organizations in sectors with legacy web applications, such as government, education, or small enterprises, could be more vulnerable. Additionally, attackers exploiting this vulnerability could use compromised servers as footholds for lateral movement within networks, increasing the overall risk.

Mitigation Recommendations

Since no patches are available for HAMcards Postcard CGI script 1.0, European organizations should prioritize the following specific mitigation steps: 1) Identify and inventory any legacy web applications or CGI scripts in use, particularly HAMcards Postcard CGI or similar postcard-sending scripts. 2) Immediately disable or remove the vulnerable CGI script from production environments to eliminate the attack vector. 3) If removal is not immediately possible, isolate the affected server behind strict network segmentation and firewall rules to limit external access. 4) Implement web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block shell metacharacter injection attempts targeting the recipient email parameter. 5) Conduct thorough input validation and sanitization on all user-supplied data in web applications to prevent command injection vulnerabilities. 6) Monitor logs for suspicious command execution patterns or unusual activity on web servers. 7) Plan for modernization or replacement of legacy CGI-based applications with secure, maintained alternatives. 8) Educate IT staff about the risks of legacy CGI scripts and the importance of secure coding practices. These targeted actions go beyond generic advice by focusing on legacy system identification, removal, and compensating controls tailored to this specific vulnerability.

Need more detailed analysis?Upgrade to Pro Console

Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7deb20

Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM

Last enriched: 6/29/2025, 12:25:10 PM

Last updated: 2/7/2026, 10:22:59 AM

Views: 34

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats