CVE-1999-1240: Buffer overflow in cddbd CD database server allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands vi
Buffer overflow in cddbd CD database server allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a long log message.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-1240 is a high-severity buffer overflow vulnerability found in the cddbd CD database server, a component developed by Gracenote. This vulnerability arises when the server processes an excessively long log message, leading to a buffer overflow condition. Exploiting this flaw allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the affected system without any authentication. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable over the network (AV:N), requires no authentication (Au:N), and has low attack complexity (AC:L). Successful exploitation compromises confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:P/I:P/A:P) of the system, as attackers can execute arbitrary code, potentially gaining full control over the server. The vulnerability was published in 1996, and no patches or updates are available, indicating that affected systems remain vulnerable if still in use. Although this vulnerability is relatively old and no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, any legacy systems running cddbd remain at risk. The cddbd server was primarily used for CD database lookups, and its deployment today is likely limited to legacy or specialized environments.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends largely on whether legacy systems running the cddbd server are still operational. If such systems exist, attackers could remotely compromise them, leading to unauthorized command execution, data breaches, and potential lateral movement within the network. This could disrupt business operations, lead to data loss or theft, and damage organizational reputation. Given the lack of patches, organizations relying on this software face persistent risk. Additionally, if the cddbd server is integrated into larger systems or networks, exploitation could serve as an entry point for broader attacks. However, due to the age and niche use of this software, the overall risk to most European enterprises is likely low unless legacy systems are present and exposed.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no official patches are available, European organizations should first conduct thorough asset inventories to identify any systems running the cddbd server. If found, immediate mitigation steps include isolating these systems from untrusted networks, especially the internet, to prevent remote exploitation. Employ network segmentation and strict firewall rules to limit access to the vulnerable service. Consider decommissioning or replacing the cddbd server with modern, supported alternatives. If removal is not feasible, deploying intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) with signatures targeting buffer overflow attempts against cddbd may help detect or block exploitation attempts. Regularly monitor logs and network traffic for suspicious activity related to this service. Finally, educate IT staff about legacy software risks and ensure that legacy systems are included in vulnerability management programs.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands
CVE-1999-1240: Buffer overflow in cddbd CD database server allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands vi
Description
Buffer overflow in cddbd CD database server allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a long log message.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-1240 is a high-severity buffer overflow vulnerability found in the cddbd CD database server, a component developed by Gracenote. This vulnerability arises when the server processes an excessively long log message, leading to a buffer overflow condition. Exploiting this flaw allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the affected system without any authentication. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable over the network (AV:N), requires no authentication (Au:N), and has low attack complexity (AC:L). Successful exploitation compromises confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:P/I:P/A:P) of the system, as attackers can execute arbitrary code, potentially gaining full control over the server. The vulnerability was published in 1996, and no patches or updates are available, indicating that affected systems remain vulnerable if still in use. Although this vulnerability is relatively old and no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, any legacy systems running cddbd remain at risk. The cddbd server was primarily used for CD database lookups, and its deployment today is likely limited to legacy or specialized environments.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends largely on whether legacy systems running the cddbd server are still operational. If such systems exist, attackers could remotely compromise them, leading to unauthorized command execution, data breaches, and potential lateral movement within the network. This could disrupt business operations, lead to data loss or theft, and damage organizational reputation. Given the lack of patches, organizations relying on this software face persistent risk. Additionally, if the cddbd server is integrated into larger systems or networks, exploitation could serve as an entry point for broader attacks. However, due to the age and niche use of this software, the overall risk to most European enterprises is likely low unless legacy systems are present and exposed.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no official patches are available, European organizations should first conduct thorough asset inventories to identify any systems running the cddbd server. If found, immediate mitigation steps include isolating these systems from untrusted networks, especially the internet, to prevent remote exploitation. Employ network segmentation and strict firewall rules to limit access to the vulnerable service. Consider decommissioning or replacing the cddbd server with modern, supported alternatives. If removal is not feasible, deploying intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) with signatures targeting buffer overflow attempts against cddbd may help detect or block exploitation attempts. Regularly monitor logs and network traffic for suspicious activity related to this service. Finally, educate IT staff about legacy software risks and ensure that legacy systems are included in vulnerability management programs.
Affected Countries
Threat ID: 682ca32ab6fd31d6ed7de55a
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:38 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 2:11:24 PM
Last updated: 2/4/2026, 4:28:57 AM
Views: 37
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-24512: CWE-20 Improper Input Validation in Kubernetes ingress-nginx
HighCVE-2026-1580: CWE-20 Improper Input Validation in Kubernetes ingress-nginx
HighCVE-2026-1862: Type Confusion in Google Chrome
HighCVE-2026-1861: Heap buffer overflow in Google Chrome
HighCVE-2026-24887: CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in anthropics claude-code
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.