CVE-1999-1455: RSH service utility RSHSVC in Windows NT 3.5 through 4.0 does not properly restrict access as specif
RSH service utility RSHSVC in Windows NT 3.5 through 4.0 does not properly restrict access as specified in the .Rhosts file when a user comes from an authorized host, which could allow unauthorized users to access the service by logging in from an authorized host.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-1455 is a high-severity vulnerability affecting the RSH (Remote Shell) service utility RSHSVC in Microsoft Windows NT versions 3.5 through 4.0. The vulnerability arises because the RSH service does not properly enforce access restrictions as specified in the .rhosts file. The .rhosts file is intended to restrict which remote hosts and users are authorized to access the service without additional authentication. However, due to improper validation, an attacker who is able to connect from an authorized host can bypass these restrictions and gain unauthorized access to the RSH service. This flaw effectively allows an attacker to impersonate a trusted user from a trusted host, leading to unauthorized remote command execution. The vulnerability has a CVSS v2 base score of 7.5, indicating a high severity level. The vector metrics (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) indicate that the attack can be performed remotely over the network with low attack complexity, requires no authentication, and can compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system. Since this vulnerability affects legacy Windows NT systems (3.5 through 4.0), which are no longer supported or widely used, there is no patch available. The RSH service itself is an outdated protocol that has been largely replaced by more secure alternatives such as SSH. Nevertheless, systems still running these legacy versions with RSH enabled remain vulnerable to unauthorized remote access and potential full system compromise if exploited.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability is primarily relevant to legacy infrastructure that still operates Windows NT 3.5 through 4.0 systems with the RSH service enabled. Exploitation could lead to unauthorized remote command execution, allowing attackers to steal sensitive data, modify or delete critical files, disrupt services, or use compromised systems as footholds for further network penetration. Although modern enterprise environments have largely phased out these legacy systems, certain industrial control systems, embedded devices, or isolated legacy applications in sectors such as manufacturing, utilities, or government may still rely on them. Unauthorized access could result in operational disruptions, data breaches, and compliance violations under regulations like GDPR. The lack of available patches and the inherent insecurity of the RSH protocol exacerbate the risk. However, the overall impact is mitigated by the rarity of these legacy systems in active use and the absence of known exploits in the wild. Organizations that have already migrated to supported Windows versions or use secure remote access protocols are not affected.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given the absence of patches for this vulnerability and the obsolescence of the affected systems, the most effective mitigation is to decommission or upgrade Windows NT 3.5 through 4.0 systems to supported operating systems that do not use the RSH service. If upgrading is not immediately feasible, organizations should disable the RSH service entirely to eliminate the attack surface. Network-level controls such as firewall rules should be implemented to block inbound and outbound traffic on the RSH port (TCP 514) to prevent remote exploitation. Additionally, organizations should audit their networks to identify any legacy systems running RSH and isolate them from critical network segments. Employing network segmentation and strict access control lists can limit exposure. Monitoring network traffic for unusual RSH activity can help detect attempted exploitation. Finally, organizations should replace RSH with secure alternatives like SSH for remote administration, ensuring strong authentication and encryption are in place.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Poland, Netherlands, Belgium, Sweden, Czech Republic
CVE-1999-1455: RSH service utility RSHSVC in Windows NT 3.5 through 4.0 does not properly restrict access as specif
Description
RSH service utility RSHSVC in Windows NT 3.5 through 4.0 does not properly restrict access as specified in the .Rhosts file when a user comes from an authorized host, which could allow unauthorized users to access the service by logging in from an authorized host.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-1455 is a high-severity vulnerability affecting the RSH (Remote Shell) service utility RSHSVC in Microsoft Windows NT versions 3.5 through 4.0. The vulnerability arises because the RSH service does not properly enforce access restrictions as specified in the .rhosts file. The .rhosts file is intended to restrict which remote hosts and users are authorized to access the service without additional authentication. However, due to improper validation, an attacker who is able to connect from an authorized host can bypass these restrictions and gain unauthorized access to the RSH service. This flaw effectively allows an attacker to impersonate a trusted user from a trusted host, leading to unauthorized remote command execution. The vulnerability has a CVSS v2 base score of 7.5, indicating a high severity level. The vector metrics (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) indicate that the attack can be performed remotely over the network with low attack complexity, requires no authentication, and can compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system. Since this vulnerability affects legacy Windows NT systems (3.5 through 4.0), which are no longer supported or widely used, there is no patch available. The RSH service itself is an outdated protocol that has been largely replaced by more secure alternatives such as SSH. Nevertheless, systems still running these legacy versions with RSH enabled remain vulnerable to unauthorized remote access and potential full system compromise if exploited.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability is primarily relevant to legacy infrastructure that still operates Windows NT 3.5 through 4.0 systems with the RSH service enabled. Exploitation could lead to unauthorized remote command execution, allowing attackers to steal sensitive data, modify or delete critical files, disrupt services, or use compromised systems as footholds for further network penetration. Although modern enterprise environments have largely phased out these legacy systems, certain industrial control systems, embedded devices, or isolated legacy applications in sectors such as manufacturing, utilities, or government may still rely on them. Unauthorized access could result in operational disruptions, data breaches, and compliance violations under regulations like GDPR. The lack of available patches and the inherent insecurity of the RSH protocol exacerbate the risk. However, the overall impact is mitigated by the rarity of these legacy systems in active use and the absence of known exploits in the wild. Organizations that have already migrated to supported Windows versions or use secure remote access protocols are not affected.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given the absence of patches for this vulnerability and the obsolescence of the affected systems, the most effective mitigation is to decommission or upgrade Windows NT 3.5 through 4.0 systems to supported operating systems that do not use the RSH service. If upgrading is not immediately feasible, organizations should disable the RSH service entirely to eliminate the attack surface. Network-level controls such as firewall rules should be implemented to block inbound and outbound traffic on the RSH port (TCP 514) to prevent remote exploitation. Additionally, organizations should audit their networks to identify any legacy systems running RSH and isolate them from critical network segments. Employing network segmentation and strict access control lists can limit exposure. Monitoring network traffic for unusual RSH activity can help detect attempted exploitation. Finally, organizations should replace RSH with secure alternatives like SSH for remote administration, ensuring strong authentication and encryption are in place.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Threat ID: 682ca32db6fd31d6ed7df684
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:41 PM
Last enriched: 6/25/2025, 4:01:55 PM
Last updated: 7/26/2025, 1:06:24 PM
Views: 11
Related Threats
CVE-2025-55161: CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Stirling-Tools Stirling-PDF
HighCVE-2025-25235: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Omnissa Secure Email Gateway
HighCVE-2025-55151: CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Stirling-Tools Stirling-PDF
HighCVE-2025-55150: CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Stirling-Tools Stirling-PDF
HighCVE-2025-55012: CWE-288: Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel in zed-industries zed
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.