Skip to main content

CVE-1999-1532: Netscape Messaging Server 3.54, 3.55, and 3.6 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service

Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-1999-1532cve-1999-1532denial of service
Published: Fri Oct 29 1999 (10/29/1999, 04:00:00 UTC)
Source: NVD
Vendor/Project: netscape
Product: messaging_server

Description

Netscape Messaging Server 3.54, 3.55, and 3.6 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service (memory exhaustion) via a series of long RCPT TO commands.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 07/01/2025, 14:25:56 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-1999-1532 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting Netscape Messaging Server versions 3.54, 3.55, and 3.6. The issue arises from the server's handling of the SMTP RCPT TO command, where a remote attacker can send a series of excessively long RCPT TO commands to the server. This causes memory exhaustion, leading to a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability does not require authentication or user interaction and can be exploited remotely over the network. The impact is limited to availability, as the attack disrupts the server's ability to process legitimate email traffic by exhausting its memory resources. No confidentiality or integrity impacts are reported. There is no patch available for this vulnerability, and no known exploits have been observed in the wild. The CVSS v2 score is 5.0, reflecting a medium severity level due to the ease of remote exploitation and the resulting service disruption. Given the age of the affected software (late 1990s), it is likely that modern environments have moved away from these versions, but legacy systems may still be at risk.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability is the potential disruption of email services if they are still running the affected Netscape Messaging Server versions. Email is a critical communication tool for businesses and public sector entities, so a denial of service could lead to operational delays, loss of productivity, and potential reputational damage. Although the vulnerability does not compromise data confidentiality or integrity, the unavailability of messaging services can affect business continuity and incident response capabilities. Organizations relying on legacy systems in sectors such as government, education, or industries with slow upgrade cycles might be particularly vulnerable. Additionally, the lack of a patch means that mitigation relies on other controls, increasing the risk if these systems remain exposed to the internet or untrusted networks.

Mitigation Recommendations

Since no patch is available for this vulnerability, European organizations should focus on compensating controls to mitigate risk. These include: 1) Isolating legacy Netscape Messaging Servers from direct internet exposure by placing them behind firewalls and restricting SMTP access to trusted IP addresses only. 2) Implementing network-level rate limiting or intrusion prevention systems (IPS) to detect and block abnormal SMTP command patterns, such as unusually long or repeated RCPT TO commands. 3) Monitoring server logs and network traffic for signs of attempted exploitation or unusual SMTP activity. 4) Planning and executing migration away from unsupported Netscape Messaging Server versions to modern, supported mail server software with active security updates. 5) Employing segmentation and strict access controls to limit the impact of any potential DoS attack. These steps will help reduce the attack surface and improve resilience until the affected systems can be fully replaced.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Threat ID: 682ca32cb6fd31d6ed7df358

Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:40 PM

Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 2:25:56 PM

Last updated: 8/1/2025, 4:25:27 PM

Views: 7

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats