Skip to main content

CVE-2000-0231: Linux kreatecd trusts a user-supplied path that is used to find the cdrecord program, allowing local

High
VulnerabilityCVE-2000-0231cve-2000-0231
Published: Thu Mar 16 2000 (03/16/2000, 05:00:00 UTC)
Source: NVD
Vendor/Project: halloween
Product: halloween_linux

Description

Linux kreatecd trusts a user-supplied path that is used to find the cdrecord program, allowing local users to gain root privileges.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 06/25/2025, 10:30:35 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2000-0231 is a local privilege escalation vulnerability affecting the Linux kreatecd utility, specifically versions 4.0, 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3 of the halloween_linux product. The vulnerability arises because kreatecd trusts a user-supplied path to locate the cdrecord program without proper validation or sanitization. This flaw allows a local attacker to specify a malicious path that points to a crafted executable masquerading as cdrecord. When kreatecd executes this malicious binary with elevated privileges, the attacker can gain root-level access on the affected system. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 7.2, indicating high severity, with the vector string AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C, meaning it requires local access, low attack complexity, no authentication, and impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability completely. No patch is currently available for this vulnerability, and there are no known exploits in the wild. The root cause is improper handling of user input in the path resolution process, leading to a classic local privilege escalation scenario. Since the vulnerability requires local access, it primarily threatens users who already have some level of access to the system but not root privileges. Exploitation does not require user interaction beyond supplying the malicious path, and the scope is limited to affected versions of the halloween_linux product on Linux systems.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability can be significant in environments where halloween_linux versions 4.0 through 6.3 are deployed, especially in development, testing, or legacy systems that still use kreatecd. Successful exploitation results in full root access, allowing attackers to compromise system confidentiality, integrity, and availability. This can lead to unauthorized data access, system manipulation, installation of persistent backdoors, and disruption of critical services. Given the local nature of the exploit, insider threats or attackers who have gained limited user access could escalate privileges to fully compromise systems. This is particularly critical for organizations with sensitive data or critical infrastructure relying on these Linux systems. Although no known exploits are currently in the wild, the high severity and ease of exploitation (low complexity, no authentication) mean that once a public exploit is developed, rapid compromise could occur. The lack of an available patch increases risk, necessitating alternative mitigation strategies. The vulnerability could also be leveraged as a stepping stone in multi-stage attacks targeting European enterprises, especially those with legacy Linux deployments.

Mitigation Recommendations

Since no official patch is available, European organizations should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Restrict local user access to systems running affected versions of halloween_linux, limiting the number of users who can execute kreatecd. 2) Employ strict file system permissions and access controls to prevent unauthorized users from placing or executing malicious binaries in directories that kreatecd searches for cdrecord. 3) Use application whitelisting or integrity monitoring tools to detect and block unauthorized modifications or execution of cdrecord or related binaries. 4) Where possible, replace or upgrade halloween_linux installations to versions or alternative tools that do not exhibit this vulnerability. 5) Conduct regular audits of user accounts and privilege levels to minimize the risk of privilege escalation. 6) Implement monitoring and alerting for suspicious local activity indicative of privilege escalation attempts, such as unexpected executions of kreatecd or cdrecord. 7) Consider sandboxing or containerizing applications that require kreatecd to limit the impact of potential exploitation. These targeted measures go beyond generic advice by focusing on controlling the attack vector (user-supplied path) and limiting local user capabilities.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Threat ID: 682ca32db6fd31d6ed7df90f

Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:41 PM

Last enriched: 6/25/2025, 10:30:35 AM

Last updated: 7/26/2025, 9:48:45 AM

Views: 10

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats