CVE-2000-1218: The default configuration for the domain name resolver for Microsoft Windows 98, NT 4.0, 2000, and X
The default configuration for the domain name resolver for Microsoft Windows 98, NT 4.0, 2000, and XP sets the QueryIpMatching parameter to 0, which causes Windows to accept DNS updates from hosts that it did not query, which allows remote attackers to poison the DNS cache.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2000-1218 is a critical vulnerability affecting the default configuration of the domain name resolver in legacy Microsoft Windows operating systems, specifically Windows 98, NT 4.0, 2000, and XP. The core issue lies in the QueryIpMatching parameter being set to 0 by default. This setting causes the DNS resolver to accept DNS update packets from any host, regardless of whether the host was the originator of the DNS query. As a result, remote attackers can send spoofed DNS update requests to vulnerable systems, leading to DNS cache poisoning. DNS cache poisoning allows attackers to inject malicious DNS entries into the resolver's cache, redirecting legitimate domain name lookups to attacker-controlled IP addresses. This can facilitate a wide range of attacks including man-in-the-middle, phishing, malware distribution, and interception of sensitive communications. The vulnerability is particularly severe because it requires no authentication or user interaction, has network attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), and impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H). Despite its age, the vulnerability remains critical due to the fundamental role of DNS in network communications and the lack of patches available for these legacy systems. The CWE-346 classification highlights the improper authentication of DNS update requests as the root cause. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, but the high CVSS score of 9.8 reflects the potential for devastating impact if exploited.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability can be significant, especially for those still operating legacy Windows systems in their infrastructure or industrial control environments. Successful exploitation can lead to DNS cache poisoning, enabling attackers to redirect traffic to malicious sites, intercept confidential communications, or disrupt access to critical services. This can result in data breaches, financial fraud, loss of customer trust, and operational downtime. Organizations in sectors such as finance, government, healthcare, and critical infrastructure are particularly at risk due to the sensitivity of their data and services. Additionally, DNS poisoning can be used as a stepping stone for further attacks, including malware deployment and lateral movement within networks. The lack of patches means organizations must rely on configuration changes or network-level defenses to mitigate risk. Given the age of the affected systems, many organizations may have already migrated, but legacy systems in use within certain environments remain vulnerable. The threat also poses risks to supply chains and third-party services that still rely on these Windows versions, potentially amplifying the impact across interconnected European networks.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no official patches are available for this vulnerability, European organizations should implement specific mitigations: 1) Disable or restrict DNS dynamic updates on affected Windows systems by setting the QueryIpMatching parameter to 1 or higher, ensuring that DNS updates are only accepted from the original querying host. 2) Where possible, phase out or isolate legacy Windows 98, NT 4.0, 2000, and XP systems from critical network segments, especially those handling DNS services. 3) Deploy network-level DNS security measures such as DNSSEC validation to detect and reject forged DNS responses, and implement ingress and egress filtering to block spoofed packets. 4) Monitor DNS traffic for anomalies indicative of cache poisoning attempts, including unexpected DNS update requests or unusual domain resolutions. 5) Use endpoint protection solutions capable of detecting DNS manipulation or suspicious network activity. 6) Educate IT staff about the risks of legacy systems and encourage migration to supported operating systems with updated security features. 7) Employ network segmentation to limit the exposure of vulnerable systems and reduce the potential impact of compromise. These targeted actions go beyond generic advice by focusing on configuration changes, network controls, and legacy system management specific to this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Poland, Belgium, Sweden, Czech Republic
CVE-2000-1218: The default configuration for the domain name resolver for Microsoft Windows 98, NT 4.0, 2000, and X
Description
The default configuration for the domain name resolver for Microsoft Windows 98, NT 4.0, 2000, and XP sets the QueryIpMatching parameter to 0, which causes Windows to accept DNS updates from hosts that it did not query, which allows remote attackers to poison the DNS cache.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2000-1218 is a critical vulnerability affecting the default configuration of the domain name resolver in legacy Microsoft Windows operating systems, specifically Windows 98, NT 4.0, 2000, and XP. The core issue lies in the QueryIpMatching parameter being set to 0 by default. This setting causes the DNS resolver to accept DNS update packets from any host, regardless of whether the host was the originator of the DNS query. As a result, remote attackers can send spoofed DNS update requests to vulnerable systems, leading to DNS cache poisoning. DNS cache poisoning allows attackers to inject malicious DNS entries into the resolver's cache, redirecting legitimate domain name lookups to attacker-controlled IP addresses. This can facilitate a wide range of attacks including man-in-the-middle, phishing, malware distribution, and interception of sensitive communications. The vulnerability is particularly severe because it requires no authentication or user interaction, has network attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), and impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H). Despite its age, the vulnerability remains critical due to the fundamental role of DNS in network communications and the lack of patches available for these legacy systems. The CWE-346 classification highlights the improper authentication of DNS update requests as the root cause. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, but the high CVSS score of 9.8 reflects the potential for devastating impact if exploited.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability can be significant, especially for those still operating legacy Windows systems in their infrastructure or industrial control environments. Successful exploitation can lead to DNS cache poisoning, enabling attackers to redirect traffic to malicious sites, intercept confidential communications, or disrupt access to critical services. This can result in data breaches, financial fraud, loss of customer trust, and operational downtime. Organizations in sectors such as finance, government, healthcare, and critical infrastructure are particularly at risk due to the sensitivity of their data and services. Additionally, DNS poisoning can be used as a stepping stone for further attacks, including malware deployment and lateral movement within networks. The lack of patches means organizations must rely on configuration changes or network-level defenses to mitigate risk. Given the age of the affected systems, many organizations may have already migrated, but legacy systems in use within certain environments remain vulnerable. The threat also poses risks to supply chains and third-party services that still rely on these Windows versions, potentially amplifying the impact across interconnected European networks.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no official patches are available for this vulnerability, European organizations should implement specific mitigations: 1) Disable or restrict DNS dynamic updates on affected Windows systems by setting the QueryIpMatching parameter to 1 or higher, ensuring that DNS updates are only accepted from the original querying host. 2) Where possible, phase out or isolate legacy Windows 98, NT 4.0, 2000, and XP systems from critical network segments, especially those handling DNS services. 3) Deploy network-level DNS security measures such as DNSSEC validation to detect and reject forged DNS responses, and implement ingress and egress filtering to block spoofed packets. 4) Monitor DNS traffic for anomalies indicative of cache poisoning attempts, including unexpected DNS update requests or unusual domain resolutions. 5) Use endpoint protection solutions capable of detecting DNS manipulation or suspicious network activity. 6) Educate IT staff about the risks of legacy systems and encourage migration to supported operating systems with updated security features. 7) Employ network segmentation to limit the exposure of vulnerable systems and reduce the potential impact of compromise. These targeted actions go beyond generic advice by focusing on configuration changes, network controls, and legacy system management specific to this vulnerability.
Threat ID: 682ca32db6fd31d6ed7df9c7
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:41 PM
Last enriched: 6/19/2025, 8:04:52 PM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 10:59:58 AM
Views: 39
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
Asian State-Backed Group TGR-STA-1030 Breaches 70 Government, Infrastructure Entities
CriticalCVE-2026-25803: CWE-798: Use of Hard-coded Credentials in denpiligrim 3dp-manager
CriticalCVE-2026-25763: CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in opf openproject
CriticalCVE-2026-1727: CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in Google Cloud Gemini Enterprise (formerly Agentspace)
CriticalCVE-2026-1731: CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in BeyondTrust Remote Support(RS) & Privileged Remote Access(PRA)
CriticalActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.