CVE-2021-44532: Improper Following of a Certificate's Chain of Trust (CWE-296) in NodeJS Node
Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 converts SANs (Subject Alternative Names) to a string format. It uses this string to check peer certificates against hostnames when validating connections. The string format was subject to an injection vulnerability when name constraints were used within a certificate chain, allowing the bypass of these name constraints.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this escape SANs containing the problematic characters in order to prevent the injection. This behavior can be reverted through the --security-revert command-line option.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2021-44532 is a vulnerability in Node.js affecting versions prior to 12.22.9, 14.18.3, 16.13.2, and 17.3.1. The issue arises from how Node.js processes Subject Alternative Names (SANs) in X.509 certificates during TLS/SSL peer certificate validation. Specifically, Node.js converts SANs to a string format and uses this string to verify that the peer certificate matches the expected hostname. However, when name constraints are applied within a certificate chain, the conversion and validation process is vulnerable to injection attacks. This improper handling allows an attacker to bypass the intended name constraints by injecting specially crafted characters into the SAN string, effectively circumventing hostname verification. This flaw is categorized under CWE-296, which relates to improper following of a certificate's chain of trust. The vulnerability undermines the integrity of TLS connections by allowing malicious certificates to be accepted as valid for hostnames they should not be authorized for. Node.js addressed this issue by escaping problematic characters in SANs to prevent injection. Users can revert to the vulnerable behavior using the --security-revert command-line option, which is discouraged. No known exploits have been reported in the wild to date. The vulnerability impacts a broad range of Node.js versions, including many long-term support (LTS) releases, making it relevant for numerous applications relying on Node.js for secure communications.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to the confidentiality and integrity of TLS-secured communications. Applications using vulnerable Node.js versions for HTTPS, secure APIs, or other TLS-based protocols may incorrectly validate peer certificates, potentially allowing attackers to impersonate legitimate services or intercept sensitive data. This could lead to man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks, data leakage, or unauthorized access to internal systems. The impact is particularly critical for sectors relying heavily on secure communications, such as finance, healthcare, and government services. Since Node.js is widely used in web services and cloud-native applications, the scope of affected systems is extensive. The vulnerability does not directly affect availability but compromises trust in secure connections, which can indirectly disrupt business operations if exploited. The lack of required authentication or user interaction for exploitation increases the risk, especially in automated or backend systems where certificate validation is critical. Although no active exploits are known, the potential for abuse remains high given the broad usage of Node.js and the fundamental nature of the flaw in certificate validation.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should prioritize upgrading Node.js to versions 12.22.9, 14.18.3, 16.13.2, 17.3.1 or later where the vulnerability is fixed. Avoid using the --security-revert option, as it re-enables the vulnerable behavior. For environments where immediate upgrade is not feasible, implement additional certificate validation layers at the application level, such as manually verifying certificate chains and name constraints using trusted libraries. Employ strict TLS configurations and certificate pinning where possible to reduce reliance on Node.js's built-in validation. Conduct thorough audits of all Node.js-based services to identify vulnerable versions and assess exposure. Integrate monitoring for unusual TLS handshake failures or suspicious certificate chains that may indicate attempted exploitation. Educate development and security teams about the risks of improper certificate validation and encourage secure coding practices around TLS usage. Finally, maintain up-to-date inventories of Node.js deployments across the organization to ensure timely patch management.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Italy, Spain, Poland, Belgium, Finland
CVE-2021-44532: Improper Following of a Certificate's Chain of Trust (CWE-296) in NodeJS Node
Description
Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 converts SANs (Subject Alternative Names) to a string format. It uses this string to check peer certificates against hostnames when validating connections. The string format was subject to an injection vulnerability when name constraints were used within a certificate chain, allowing the bypass of these name constraints.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this escape SANs containing the problematic characters in order to prevent the injection. This behavior can be reverted through the --security-revert command-line option.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2021-44532 is a vulnerability in Node.js affecting versions prior to 12.22.9, 14.18.3, 16.13.2, and 17.3.1. The issue arises from how Node.js processes Subject Alternative Names (SANs) in X.509 certificates during TLS/SSL peer certificate validation. Specifically, Node.js converts SANs to a string format and uses this string to verify that the peer certificate matches the expected hostname. However, when name constraints are applied within a certificate chain, the conversion and validation process is vulnerable to injection attacks. This improper handling allows an attacker to bypass the intended name constraints by injecting specially crafted characters into the SAN string, effectively circumventing hostname verification. This flaw is categorized under CWE-296, which relates to improper following of a certificate's chain of trust. The vulnerability undermines the integrity of TLS connections by allowing malicious certificates to be accepted as valid for hostnames they should not be authorized for. Node.js addressed this issue by escaping problematic characters in SANs to prevent injection. Users can revert to the vulnerable behavior using the --security-revert command-line option, which is discouraged. No known exploits have been reported in the wild to date. The vulnerability impacts a broad range of Node.js versions, including many long-term support (LTS) releases, making it relevant for numerous applications relying on Node.js for secure communications.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to the confidentiality and integrity of TLS-secured communications. Applications using vulnerable Node.js versions for HTTPS, secure APIs, or other TLS-based protocols may incorrectly validate peer certificates, potentially allowing attackers to impersonate legitimate services or intercept sensitive data. This could lead to man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks, data leakage, or unauthorized access to internal systems. The impact is particularly critical for sectors relying heavily on secure communications, such as finance, healthcare, and government services. Since Node.js is widely used in web services and cloud-native applications, the scope of affected systems is extensive. The vulnerability does not directly affect availability but compromises trust in secure connections, which can indirectly disrupt business operations if exploited. The lack of required authentication or user interaction for exploitation increases the risk, especially in automated or backend systems where certificate validation is critical. Although no active exploits are known, the potential for abuse remains high given the broad usage of Node.js and the fundamental nature of the flaw in certificate validation.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should prioritize upgrading Node.js to versions 12.22.9, 14.18.3, 16.13.2, 17.3.1 or later where the vulnerability is fixed. Avoid using the --security-revert option, as it re-enables the vulnerable behavior. For environments where immediate upgrade is not feasible, implement additional certificate validation layers at the application level, such as manually verifying certificate chains and name constraints using trusted libraries. Employ strict TLS configurations and certificate pinning where possible to reduce reliance on Node.js's built-in validation. Conduct thorough audits of all Node.js-based services to identify vulnerable versions and assess exposure. Integrate monitoring for unusual TLS handshake failures or suspicious certificate chains that may indicate attempted exploitation. Educate development and security teams about the risks of improper certificate validation and encourage secure coding practices around TLS usage. Finally, maintain up-to-date inventories of Node.js deployments across the organization to ensure timely patch management.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- hackerone
- Date Reserved
- 2021-12-02T00:00:00
- Cisa Enriched
- false
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682d983ac4522896dcbed49f
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:14 AM
Last enriched: 6/25/2025, 2:18:20 PM
Last updated: 7/6/2025, 5:03:33 AM
Views: 6
Related Threats
CVE-2025-7166: SQL Injection in code-projects Responsive Blog Site
MediumCVE-2025-6746: CWE-98 Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') in xTemos Woodmart
HighCVE-2025-6743: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in xTemos Woodmart
MediumCVE-2025-7165: SQL Injection in PHPGurukul Cyber Cafe Management System
MediumCVE-2025-7327: CWE-98 Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') in techlabpro1 Widget for Google Reviews
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.