VulnerabilityPublished 21 Sep 2022Updated 29 May 2025

CVE-2022-2265: Çekino Bilgi Teknolojileri · Path Traversal: '.../...//

Affects Çekino Bilgi TeknolojileriSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.5 High : upgrade to 2.1.25 soon.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.5High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.8% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 58% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 2.1.25

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 21 Sep 2022
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade Çekino Bilgi Teknolojileri to 2.1.25.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Çekino Bilgi Teknolojileri Çekino Bilgi Teknolojileri	Affected <2.1.25	Fixed in 2.1.25

AI-suggested

European organizations should immediately verify if they are running versions of the Çekino Bilgi Teknolojileri Identity and Directory Management System prior to 2.1.25. The primary mitigation is to upgrade to version 2.1.25 or later, where the vulnerability has been fixed. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, organizations should implement strict network-level access controls to restrict external access to the affected system, ideally limiting it to trusted internal networks or VPNs. Web application firewalls (WAFs) can be configured to detect and block path traversal attack patterns such as sequences containing '.../...//'. Additionally, organizations should audit logs for suspicious access attempts that may indicate exploitation attempts. Implementing file system permissions to restrict the application's access to only necessary directories can reduce the impact of successful exploitation. Regular vulnerability scanning and penetration testing focused on path traversal and input validation should be conducted to detect similar issues. Finally, organizations should monitor threat intelligence sources for any emerging exploits targeting this CVE to respond promptly.

Description

The Identity and Directory Management System developed by Çekino Bilgi Teknolojileri before version 2.1.25 has an unauthenticated Path traversal vulnerability. This has been fixed in the version 2.1.25

Impact

For European organizations using the Çekino Bilgi Teknolojileri Identity and Directory Management System, this vulnerability poses a significant risk of unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information. Since identity and directory management systems often store critical user credentials, access control policies, and organizational data, exploitation could lead to exposure of confidential information, potentially facilitating further attacks such as privilege escalation or lateral movement within networks. The unauthenticated nature of the vulnerability means attackers can exploit it remotely without any prior access, increasing the threat level. This could impact sectors with high regulatory requirements for data protection, such as finance, healthcare, and government institutions within Europe. The confidentiality breach could result in non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations, leading to legal and financial consequences. Although no integrity or availability impacts are reported, the loss of confidentiality alone is critical given the nature of the system affected. The lack of known exploits in the wild reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the threat, especially if attackers develop exploits targeting this vulnerability.

CWE-35Path Traversal: '.../...//' (opens in a new tab)
Variant weaknessOWASP Top 10 A01:2021: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product uses external input to construct a pathname that should be within a restricted directory, but it does not properly neutralize '.../...//' (doubled triple dot slash) sequences that can resolve to a location that is outside of that directory.
Implementation · Input Validation
Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
Implementation · Input Validation
Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174).
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V12.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

usom.gov.tr/bildirim/tr-22-0636 (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 7 Jul 2025, 22:55 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-35

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats