CVE-2022-31172: CWE-20: Improper Input Validation in OpenZeppelin openzeppelin-contracts
OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.1.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to the SignatureChecker reverting. `SignatureChecker.isValidSignatureNow` is not expected to revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8's `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn't implement EIP-1271 as expected. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `SignatureChecker` to check the validity of a signature and handle invalid signatures in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2022-31172 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting OpenZeppelin Contracts, a widely used library for developing Ethereum smart contracts. The issue exists in versions 4.1.0 through 4.7.0 of the openzeppelin-contracts package, specifically in the SignatureChecker utility. The function SignatureChecker.isValidSignatureNow is designed to verify the validity of cryptographic signatures, relying on the EIP-1271 standard for contract-based signature validation. The vulnerability arises from an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8's abi.decode behavior, which can cause the function to revert unexpectedly when interacting with target contracts that do not implement EIP-1271 as expected. This improper input validation (classified under CWE-20) means that if a contract uses SignatureChecker to validate signatures and expects non-reverting behavior on invalid signatures, it may instead experience unintended reverts. This can disrupt contract logic, potentially causing denial of service or unexpected transaction failures. The vulnerability was patched in version 4.7.1 by correcting the handling of abi.decode and ensuring that SignatureChecker.isValidSignatureNow does not revert improperly. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, but the issue affects a fundamental component of many smart contracts, making it a significant concern for blockchain applications relying on OpenZeppelin libraries.
Potential Impact
For European organizations utilizing blockchain technology, decentralized finance (DeFi), or other Ethereum-based applications, this vulnerability could lead to transaction failures or denial of service conditions within smart contracts that rely on OpenZeppelin's SignatureChecker for signature validation. This may disrupt business processes, degrade user experience, and potentially cause financial losses if critical contract functions fail unexpectedly. Since OpenZeppelin Contracts are widely adopted in the blockchain ecosystem, organizations involved in fintech, supply chain, digital identity, and other sectors leveraging smart contracts are at risk. The impact is primarily on availability and integrity of contract operations rather than confidentiality. Given the decentralized and immutable nature of blockchain deployments, patching requires contract upgrades or redeployments, which can be complex and costly. Additionally, failure to address this vulnerability may undermine trust in blockchain applications and expose organizations to reputational damage.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should take the following specific actions: 1) Audit all smart contracts that use OpenZeppelin Contracts versions between 4.1.0 and 4.7.0, focusing on those employing SignatureChecker for signature validation. 2) Upgrade to OpenZeppelin Contracts version 4.7.1 or later, where the vulnerability is patched. 3) For deployed contracts that cannot be upgraded, implement fallback mechanisms to handle potential reverts from SignatureChecker.isValidSignatureNow, such as try-catch blocks or alternative signature validation logic. 4) Conduct thorough testing of signature validation flows under various scenarios, including interactions with contracts that do not implement EIP-1271 correctly. 5) Monitor blockchain transaction logs for unexpected revert patterns that may indicate exploitation attempts or contract failures. 6) Educate development teams on the nuances of Solidity 0.8's abi.decode behavior and proper input validation practices. 7) Collaborate with blockchain security auditors to assess the risk and remediation strategies for existing deployments. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific nature of the vulnerability and the operational constraints of smart contract environments.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, Netherlands, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Estonia, Luxembourg
CVE-2022-31172: CWE-20: Improper Input Validation in OpenZeppelin openzeppelin-contracts
Description
OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.1.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to the SignatureChecker reverting. `SignatureChecker.isValidSignatureNow` is not expected to revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8's `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn't implement EIP-1271 as expected. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `SignatureChecker` to check the validity of a signature and handle invalid signatures in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2022-31172 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting OpenZeppelin Contracts, a widely used library for developing Ethereum smart contracts. The issue exists in versions 4.1.0 through 4.7.0 of the openzeppelin-contracts package, specifically in the SignatureChecker utility. The function SignatureChecker.isValidSignatureNow is designed to verify the validity of cryptographic signatures, relying on the EIP-1271 standard for contract-based signature validation. The vulnerability arises from an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8's abi.decode behavior, which can cause the function to revert unexpectedly when interacting with target contracts that do not implement EIP-1271 as expected. This improper input validation (classified under CWE-20) means that if a contract uses SignatureChecker to validate signatures and expects non-reverting behavior on invalid signatures, it may instead experience unintended reverts. This can disrupt contract logic, potentially causing denial of service or unexpected transaction failures. The vulnerability was patched in version 4.7.1 by correcting the handling of abi.decode and ensuring that SignatureChecker.isValidSignatureNow does not revert improperly. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, but the issue affects a fundamental component of many smart contracts, making it a significant concern for blockchain applications relying on OpenZeppelin libraries.
Potential Impact
For European organizations utilizing blockchain technology, decentralized finance (DeFi), or other Ethereum-based applications, this vulnerability could lead to transaction failures or denial of service conditions within smart contracts that rely on OpenZeppelin's SignatureChecker for signature validation. This may disrupt business processes, degrade user experience, and potentially cause financial losses if critical contract functions fail unexpectedly. Since OpenZeppelin Contracts are widely adopted in the blockchain ecosystem, organizations involved in fintech, supply chain, digital identity, and other sectors leveraging smart contracts are at risk. The impact is primarily on availability and integrity of contract operations rather than confidentiality. Given the decentralized and immutable nature of blockchain deployments, patching requires contract upgrades or redeployments, which can be complex and costly. Additionally, failure to address this vulnerability may undermine trust in blockchain applications and expose organizations to reputational damage.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should take the following specific actions: 1) Audit all smart contracts that use OpenZeppelin Contracts versions between 4.1.0 and 4.7.0, focusing on those employing SignatureChecker for signature validation. 2) Upgrade to OpenZeppelin Contracts version 4.7.1 or later, where the vulnerability is patched. 3) For deployed contracts that cannot be upgraded, implement fallback mechanisms to handle potential reverts from SignatureChecker.isValidSignatureNow, such as try-catch blocks or alternative signature validation logic. 4) Conduct thorough testing of signature validation flows under various scenarios, including interactions with contracts that do not implement EIP-1271 correctly. 5) Monitor blockchain transaction logs for unexpected revert patterns that may indicate exploitation attempts or contract failures. 6) Educate development teams on the nuances of Solidity 0.8's abi.decode behavior and proper input validation practices. 7) Collaborate with blockchain security auditors to assess the risk and remediation strategies for existing deployments. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific nature of the vulnerability and the operational constraints of smart contract environments.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- GitHub_M
- Date Reserved
- 2022-05-18T00:00:00.000Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
Threat ID: 682d9844c4522896dcbf3915
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:24 AM
Last enriched: 6/23/2025, 1:21:11 AM
Last updated: 8/14/2025, 10:36:42 AM
Views: 9
Related Threats
CVE-2025-9060: CWE-20 Improper Input Validation in MSoft MFlash
CriticalCVE-2025-8675: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Drupal AI SEO Link Advisor
MediumCVE-2025-8362: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in Drupal GoogleTag Manager
MediumCVE-2025-8361: CWE-962 Missing Authorization in Drupal Config Pages
HighCVE-2025-8092: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in Drupal COOKiES Consent Management
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.