CVE-2025-30023: AXIS Camera Station Pro · Deserialization of Untrusted Data
Affects AXIS Camera Station ProSource CVE Database V5
Not known to be exploited · CVSS 9.0 Critical : upgrade to 6.9 as a priority.
Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 13:47 UTC
- EPSS
- 0.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 49% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
- Patch
- Available – fixed in 6.9
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:HExploitation evidence
Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 11 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors
A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.
What to do
Upgrade AXIS Camera Station Pro to 6.9.
Affected software
| Product | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| Axis Communications AB AXIS Camera Station Pro | Affected
| Fixed in
|
AI-suggested
To mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should prioritize upgrading AXIS Camera Station Pro to version 6.9 or later, where the vulnerability has been addressed. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, organizations should restrict access to the management interfaces of the affected systems to trusted networks and users only, employing network segmentation and strict access controls. Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) to reduce the risk of credential compromise. Monitoring and logging of authentication events and unusual activities on the camera management systems should be enhanced to detect potential exploitation attempts. Additionally, organizations should review and harden the configuration of the surveillance infrastructure, disable unnecessary services, and apply the principle of least privilege to user accounts. Regular vulnerability scanning and penetration testing focusing on physical security systems can help identify residual risks. Finally, maintaining an incident response plan that includes scenarios involving physical security system compromise is recommended.
Description
The communication protocol used between client and server had a flaw that could lead to an authenticated user performing a remote code execution attack.