CVE-2025-32988: Double Free
A flaw was found in GnuTLS. A double-free vulnerability exists in GnuTLS due to incorrect ownership handling in the export logic of Subject Alternative Name (SAN) entries containing an otherName. If the type-id OID is invalid or malformed, GnuTLS will call asn1_delete_structure() on an ASN.1 node it does not own, leading to a double-free condition when the parent function or caller later attempts to free the same structure. This vulnerability can be triggered using only public GnuTLS APIs and may result in denial of service or memory corruption, depending on allocator behavior.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-32988 is a double-free vulnerability discovered in the GnuTLS library, a widely used open-source implementation of the TLS protocol. The flaw arises from improper ownership management of ASN.1 nodes during the export of Subject Alternative Name (SAN) entries that contain an otherName field. Specifically, if the type-id Object Identifier (OID) within the otherName is invalid or malformed, GnuTLS erroneously calls asn1_delete_structure() on an ASN.1 node it does not own. This leads to a double-free condition when the parent function or caller subsequently attempts to free the same memory structure again. Because the vulnerability can be triggered through public GnuTLS APIs without requiring authentication or user interaction, remote attackers can exploit this flaw by crafting malicious certificates or TLS handshake messages containing malformed SAN otherName entries. The impact of this vulnerability depends on the underlying memory allocator behavior; it may cause denial of service due to application crashes or, in some cases, memory corruption that could potentially be leveraged for further exploitation. The vulnerability affects Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10, which bundles GnuTLS, and likely other Linux distributions or software relying on the vulnerable GnuTLS versions. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 6.5, reflecting a medium severity with network attack vector, high attack complexity, no privileges required, no user interaction, unchanged scope, no confidentiality impact, limited integrity impact, and high availability impact. No public exploits have been reported yet, but the flaw warrants prompt attention due to its potential to disrupt TLS-secured communications.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of CVE-2025-32988 is denial of service (DoS) resulting from application crashes caused by double-free memory errors in GnuTLS. This can disrupt secure communications for services relying on GnuTLS for TLS encryption, including web servers, mail servers, VPNs, and other networked applications. In some allocator environments, memory corruption could lead to undefined behavior or potentially enable remote code execution, although no such exploits are currently known. Organizations using Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 or other affected distributions may experience service outages or degraded security posture until patched. The vulnerability does not directly compromise confidentiality but may undermine integrity and availability of TLS sessions. Given GnuTLS’s widespread use in open-source and enterprise software stacks, the threat surface is broad, affecting critical infrastructure and enterprise environments globally. The medium severity rating reflects the balance between ease of remote exploitation and the primarily DoS-focused impact.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should monitor Red Hat and GnuTLS project advisories for official patches addressing CVE-2025-32988 and apply them promptly once available. Until patches are deployed, administrators can mitigate risk by implementing strict input validation and filtering of certificates and TLS handshake data, particularly scrutinizing SAN entries with otherName fields. Network-level protections such as TLS inspection proxies or Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) may help detect and block malformed TLS handshakes exploiting this flaw. Additionally, running GnuTLS-dependent services with least privilege and employing memory protection mechanisms (e.g., ASLR, heap hardening) can reduce exploitation impact. Regularly updating all cryptographic libraries and dependencies is critical. Security teams should also audit logs for unusual TLS handshake failures or crashes indicative of attempted exploitation. Coordinated vulnerability management and incident response plans will help minimize operational disruption.
Affected Countries
United States, Germany, India, China, United Kingdom, France, Japan, Canada, Australia, Brazil
CVE-2025-32988: Double Free
Description
A flaw was found in GnuTLS. A double-free vulnerability exists in GnuTLS due to incorrect ownership handling in the export logic of Subject Alternative Name (SAN) entries containing an otherName. If the type-id OID is invalid or malformed, GnuTLS will call asn1_delete_structure() on an ASN.1 node it does not own, leading to a double-free condition when the parent function or caller later attempts to free the same structure. This vulnerability can be triggered using only public GnuTLS APIs and may result in denial of service or memory corruption, depending on allocator behavior.
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-32988 is a double-free vulnerability discovered in the GnuTLS library, a widely used open-source implementation of the TLS protocol. The flaw arises from improper ownership management of ASN.1 nodes during the export of Subject Alternative Name (SAN) entries that contain an otherName field. Specifically, if the type-id Object Identifier (OID) within the otherName is invalid or malformed, GnuTLS erroneously calls asn1_delete_structure() on an ASN.1 node it does not own. This leads to a double-free condition when the parent function or caller subsequently attempts to free the same memory structure again. Because the vulnerability can be triggered through public GnuTLS APIs without requiring authentication or user interaction, remote attackers can exploit this flaw by crafting malicious certificates or TLS handshake messages containing malformed SAN otherName entries. The impact of this vulnerability depends on the underlying memory allocator behavior; it may cause denial of service due to application crashes or, in some cases, memory corruption that could potentially be leveraged for further exploitation. The vulnerability affects Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10, which bundles GnuTLS, and likely other Linux distributions or software relying on the vulnerable GnuTLS versions. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 6.5, reflecting a medium severity with network attack vector, high attack complexity, no privileges required, no user interaction, unchanged scope, no confidentiality impact, limited integrity impact, and high availability impact. No public exploits have been reported yet, but the flaw warrants prompt attention due to its potential to disrupt TLS-secured communications.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of CVE-2025-32988 is denial of service (DoS) resulting from application crashes caused by double-free memory errors in GnuTLS. This can disrupt secure communications for services relying on GnuTLS for TLS encryption, including web servers, mail servers, VPNs, and other networked applications. In some allocator environments, memory corruption could lead to undefined behavior or potentially enable remote code execution, although no such exploits are currently known. Organizations using Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 or other affected distributions may experience service outages or degraded security posture until patched. The vulnerability does not directly compromise confidentiality but may undermine integrity and availability of TLS sessions. Given GnuTLS’s widespread use in open-source and enterprise software stacks, the threat surface is broad, affecting critical infrastructure and enterprise environments globally. The medium severity rating reflects the balance between ease of remote exploitation and the primarily DoS-focused impact.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should monitor Red Hat and GnuTLS project advisories for official patches addressing CVE-2025-32988 and apply them promptly once available. Until patches are deployed, administrators can mitigate risk by implementing strict input validation and filtering of certificates and TLS handshake data, particularly scrutinizing SAN entries with otherName fields. Network-level protections such as TLS inspection proxies or Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) may help detect and block malformed TLS handshakes exploiting this flaw. Additionally, running GnuTLS-dependent services with least privilege and employing memory protection mechanisms (e.g., ASLR, heap hardening) can reduce exploitation impact. Regularly updating all cryptographic libraries and dependencies is critical. Security teams should also audit logs for unusual TLS handshake failures or crashes indicative of attempted exploitation. Coordinated vulnerability management and incident response plans will help minimize operational disruption.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- redhat
- Date Reserved
- 2025-04-15T01:31:12.104Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 686f76caa83201eaaca669ce
Added to database: 7/10/2025, 8:16:10 AM
Last enriched: 2/27/2026, 1:18:19 PM
Last updated: 3/22/2026, 12:04:10 AM
Views: 314
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.