Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-32989: Improper Certificate Validation

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-32989cvecve-2025-32989
Published: Thu Jul 10 2025 (07/10/2025, 08:05:26 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: Red Hat
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10

Description

A heap-buffer-overread vulnerability was found in GnuTLS in how it handles the Certificate Transparency (CT) Signed Certificate Timestamp (SCT) extension during X.509 certificate parsing. This flaw allows a malicious user to create a certificate containing a malformed SCT extension (OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.11129.2.4.2) that contains sensitive data. This issue leads to the exposure of confidential information when GnuTLS verifies certificates from certain websites when the certificate (SCT) is not checked correctly.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 11/11/2025, 22:30:26 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-32989 is a vulnerability identified in the GnuTLS library, specifically in how it processes the Certificate Transparency (CT) Signed Certificate Timestamp (SCT) extension during X.509 certificate parsing. The SCT extension, identified by OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.11129.2.4.2, is designed to provide transparency and accountability for issued certificates by including signed timestamps. However, due to improper validation, a heap-buffer-overread occurs when GnuTLS encounters a malformed SCT extension. This memory overread can lead to the exposure of sensitive data residing in memory buffers during the certificate verification process. The vulnerability affects Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10, which uses GnuTLS for TLS communications. The flaw can be triggered remotely without requiring authentication or user interaction, as it occurs during the TLS handshake when verifying certificates from certain websites. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 5.3 (medium), reflecting the network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required, no user interaction, and limited confidentiality impact without affecting integrity or availability. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, but the vulnerability poses a risk of confidential information leakage, potentially including cryptographic material or other sensitive data in memory. The issue highlights the importance of robust parsing and validation of certificate extensions in cryptographic libraries.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability could lead to the unintended disclosure of sensitive information during TLS communications, particularly when connecting to or verifying certificates from malicious or compromised servers presenting crafted SCT extensions. This exposure could compromise confidentiality of cryptographic operations or other sensitive data held in memory buffers during certificate validation. Organizations relying on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 and GnuTLS for secure communications, including government agencies, financial institutions, healthcare providers, and critical infrastructure operators, may face increased risk of data leakage. Although the vulnerability does not directly allow code execution or service disruption, the confidentiality breach could facilitate further attacks or espionage. The medium severity indicates a moderate risk that should be addressed promptly to maintain trust in TLS communications and protect sensitive data. The lack of known exploits reduces immediate urgency but does not eliminate the threat, especially given the remote and unauthenticated nature of the vulnerability.

Mitigation Recommendations

1. Apply official patches and updates from Red Hat as soon as they become available to address the vulnerability in GnuTLS. 2. Until patches are deployed, consider implementing network-level controls such as TLS interception and inspection to detect and block suspicious certificates with malformed SCT extensions. 3. Enforce strict certificate validation policies and monitor TLS traffic for anomalies related to certificate extensions. 4. Use alternative cryptographic libraries or TLS implementations that are not affected by this vulnerability if immediate patching is not feasible. 5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing focusing on TLS implementations and certificate handling. 6. Educate security teams about the risks of malformed certificate extensions and ensure incident response plans include scenarios involving TLS certificate manipulation. 7. Monitor threat intelligence feeds for any emerging exploits targeting this vulnerability to enable rapid response.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
redhat
Date Reserved
2025-04-15T01:31:12.104Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 686f76caa83201eaaca669d2

Added to database: 7/10/2025, 8:16:10 AM

Last enriched: 11/11/2025, 10:30:26 PM

Last updated: 11/24/2025, 1:11:02 PM

Views: 101

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats