CVE-2025-3498VulnerabilityPublished 9 Jul 2025

CVE-2025-3498: Radiflow iSAP Smart Collector · Missing Authentication

Affects Radiflow iSAP Smart CollectorSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 9.9 Critical.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

9.9Critical

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 27% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: High
Availability: Low

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 9 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Radiflow iSAP Smart Collector	Affected =1.20	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Immediate mitigation should focus on restricting access to the management network where the vulnerable Radiflow iSAP Smart Collector devices reside. Network segmentation must be enforced to ensure only authorized personnel and systems can reach TCP ports 8084 and 8086. Implement strict firewall rules and access control lists (ACLs) to block unauthorized access. Monitoring and logging of access attempts to these ports should be enhanced to detect suspicious activity. Where possible, disable or restrict the vulnerable REST APIs until a vendor patch is released. Organizations should engage with Radiflow for updates and apply patches promptly once available. Additionally, conduct thorough audits of device configurations and network architecture to identify and remediate any exposure of management interfaces to untrusted networks. Incident response plans should be updated to address potential exploitation scenarios involving these devices.

Description

An unauthenticated user with management network access can get and modify the Radiflow iSAP Smart Collector (CentOS 7 - VSAP 1.20) configuration. The device has two web servers that expose unauthenticated REST APIs on the management network (TCP ports 8084 and 8086). An attacker can use these APIs to get access to all system settings, modify the configuration and execute some commands (e.g., system reboot).

Impact

For European organizations, particularly those in critical infrastructure sectors such as energy, utilities, and industrial control systems, this vulnerability poses a severe risk. Radiflow's iSAP Smart Collector is used for network monitoring and security in operational technology (OT) environments. Unauthorized configuration changes could lead to data manipulation, loss of monitoring visibility, or denial of service through device reboot. This can disrupt operational continuity, cause safety hazards, or facilitate further attacks by masking malicious activities. Confidentiality is at risk as attackers can access sensitive system settings. Integrity is compromised due to the ability to modify configurations, potentially falsifying monitoring data or disabling security controls. Availability is affected by the capability to reboot the device, causing service interruptions. Given the critical role of such devices in industrial networks, exploitation could have cascading effects on broader infrastructure and services. The lack of authentication on management interfaces increases the attack surface, especially if network segmentation is weak or management networks are accessible beyond strictly controlled environments.

CWE-306Missing Authentication for Critical Function (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #21OWASP Top 10 A07:2025: Authentication Failures (opens in a new tab)
The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.
Architecture and Design
Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Identify which of these areas require a proven user identity, and use a centralized authentication capability.
Architecture and Design
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks…
Architecture and Design
Where possible, avoid implementing custom, "grow-your-own" authentication routines and consider using authentication capabilities as provided by the surrounding framework, operating system, or environment.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
OWASP Authentication (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V1.2.3 (opens in a new tab)
V1.2.2 (opens in a new tab)
V1.2.4 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Choosing Message Identifier (opens in a new tab)
Force the System to Reset Values (opens in a new tab)
Using Unpublished Interfaces or Functionality (opens in a new tab)
Cross Site Request Forgery (opens in a new tab)
Communication Channel Manipulation (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

cvcn.gov.it/cvcn/cve/CVE-2025-3498 (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 9 Jul 2025, 09:24 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-306

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats