CVE-2025-53495VulnerabilityPublished 7 Jul 2025Updated 8 Jul 2025

CVE-2025-53495: Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki – AbuseFilter Extension · Missing Authorization

Affects Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki – AbuseFilter ExtensionSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 9.1 Critical : upgrade to 1.44.0 as a priority.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

9.1Critical

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 25% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 1.44.0

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 7 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade wikimedia/mediawiki/extensions/AbuseFilter to 1.44.0.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubwikimedia/mediawiki/extensions/AbuseFilter`pkg:github/wikimedia/mediawiki/extensions/AbuseFilter`Other threats	Affected >=1.43.0 <1.44.0	Fixed in 1.44.0

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

To mitigate this vulnerability, European organizations should immediately upgrade the AbuseFilter extension to version 1.43.2 or later, where the missing authorization checks have been implemented. If immediate patching is not possible, organizations should restrict network access to the MediaWiki AbuseFilter administrative interfaces using IP whitelisting or VPNs to limit exposure. Implementing web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious requests targeting AbuseFilter endpoints can provide temporary protection. Regularly audit user permissions and monitor logs for unusual activity related to AbuseFilter configurations. Organizations should also consider deploying intrusion detection systems (IDS) to alert on potential exploitation attempts. Since no known exploits are reported yet, proactive patch management and network-level controls are critical. Finally, educating administrators about this vulnerability and ensuring they follow secure configuration best practices will reduce risk.

Description

Missing Authorization vulnerability in Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - AbuseFilter Extension allows Unauthorized Access.This issue affects Mediawiki - AbuseFilter Extension: from 1.43.X before 1.43.2.

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability can be significant, especially for institutions relying on MediaWiki for knowledge management, documentation, or collaborative projects. Unauthorized access to the AbuseFilter extension can lead to unauthorized content modifications, misinformation, or vandalism, which can damage organizational reputation and trust. Public sector entities, educational institutions, and research organizations in Europe often use MediaWiki-based platforms for transparency and collaboration; thus, exploitation could disrupt critical information workflows. Additionally, the compromise of content integrity may have legal and compliance implications under regulations such as the EU's GDPR if misinformation leads to data inaccuracies or harms individuals. Since the vulnerability does not affect availability, denial-of-service is unlikely, but the confidentiality and integrity breaches pose a high risk to data trustworthiness. The ease of exploitation without authentication means attackers can operate remotely and anonymously, increasing the threat landscape. European organizations with publicly accessible MediaWiki installations are particularly vulnerable to automated or targeted attacks exploiting this flaw.

CWE-862Missing Authorization (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #4OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
Architecture and Design
Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
Architecture and Design
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V8.3.8 (opens in a new tab)
V13.4.2 (opens in a new tab)
V7.2.2 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 14 Jul 2025, 21:11 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-862

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats