CVE-2025-6788VulnerabilityPublished 11 Jul 2025Updated 22 Jul 2025

CVE-2025-6788: Schneider Electric EcoStruxure™ Power Monitoring Expert · Resource Exposure

Affects Schneider Electric EcoStruxure™ Power Monitoring ExpertSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 25% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 11 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Schneider Electric EcoStruxure™ Power Monitoring Expert	Affected =2023 =2024	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Implement strict access control policies within EcoStruxure™ Power Monitoring Expert to ensure that user roles and permissions are tightly scoped and regularly reviewed to minimize unnecessary access to TGML diagrams. 2. Employ network segmentation and isolation for systems running EcoStruxure™ Power Monitoring Expert to limit exposure to authenticated users who do not require access to sensitive control spheres. 3. Monitor and audit user access logs specifically for TGML diagram resources to detect unusual access patterns or unauthorized attempts. 4. Coordinate with Schneider Electric for timely updates or patches addressing CVE-2025-6788 and apply them promptly once available. 5. Consider deploying additional compensating controls such as multi-factor authentication (MFA) for accessing the monitoring platform to reduce the risk of compromised credentials being used to exploit this vulnerability. 6. Conduct regular security awareness training for users with access to the system to highlight the importance of safeguarding credentials and recognizing suspicious activity.

Description

A CWE-668: Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere vulnerability exists that exposes TGML diagram resources to the wrong control sphere, providing other authenticated users with potentially inappropriate access to TGML diagrams.

Impact

For European organizations, particularly those in critical infrastructure sectors such as energy and utilities, this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized disclosure of sensitive power monitoring diagrams. Such diagrams might reveal network topology, control logic, or operational parameters that could be leveraged by malicious actors to plan more sophisticated attacks or cause operational disruptions. Although the vulnerability does not directly impact system integrity or availability, the exposure of sensitive information could undermine operational security and increase the risk of insider threats or external attackers gaining strategic insights. Organizations relying on Schneider Electric's EcoStruxure™ Power Monitoring Expert for energy management and monitoring should consider the potential for lateral movement or privilege escalation attempts facilitated by this information exposure. The medium severity rating reflects the limited scope of impact but acknowledges the importance of confidentiality in industrial control systems.

CWE-668Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessOWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product exposes a resource to the wrong control sphere, providing unintended actors with inappropriate access to the resource.
MITRE discourages mapping vulnerabilities to this broad entry; the root cause is usually a more specific weakness.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

download.schneider-electric.com/files?p_Doc_Ref=SEVD-2025-189-04&p_enDocType=Security+and+Safety+Notice&p_File_Name=SEVD-2025-189-04.pdf (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 26 Jul 2025, 00:53 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-668

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats