CVE-2025-6961VulnerabilityPublished 1 Jul 2025

CVE-2025-6961: Campcodes Employee Management System · SQL Injection

Affects Campcodes Employee Management SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 48% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 1 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Campcodes Employee Management System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

European organizations should immediately assess their exposure to Campcodes Employee Management System version 1.0, particularly instances accessible over the network. In the absence of an official patch, organizations should implement strict input validation and parameterized queries within the application code if source code access is available. Network-level mitigations include restricting access to the /mark.php endpoint via firewall rules or web application firewalls (WAFs) configured to detect and block SQL injection patterns. Monitoring and logging of database queries and application logs should be enhanced to detect suspicious activities indicative of SQL injection attempts. Organizations should also conduct thorough audits of their employee management systems to identify and isolate vulnerable instances. If feasible, migrating to a newer, patched version or alternative software solutions should be prioritized. Additionally, organizations must ensure that backups of critical employee data are current and securely stored to enable recovery in case of data tampering or deletion.

Description

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Campcodes Employee Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /mark.php. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Impact

For European organizations using Campcodes Employee Management System 1.0, this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized access to employee records, including personal identification information, payroll data, and performance evaluations. Such data breaches could result in regulatory non-compliance, particularly under GDPR, leading to substantial fines and reputational damage. Additionally, attackers could manipulate or delete critical employee data, disrupting HR operations and potentially causing operational downtime. The ability to execute arbitrary SQL commands remotely without authentication increases the risk of widespread exploitation, especially if the system is exposed to the internet or poorly segmented within internal networks. The medium CVSS score suggests that while the vulnerability is serious, the overall impact might be somewhat contained if compensating controls are in place. However, the public disclosure of the exploit code raises the likelihood of targeted attacks against European entities, especially those with limited cybersecurity defenses or outdated software management practices.

Summary

CVE-2025-6961 is a critical SQL Injection vulnerability identified in version 1.0 of the Campcodes Employee Management System, specifically within the /mark.php file. The vulnerability arises due to improper sanitization or validation of the 'ID' parameter, which an attacker can manipulate to inject malicious SQL code. This flaw allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the backend database without requiring authentication or user interaction. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 6.9, reflecting a medium severity rating, primarily because while the attack vector is network-based and requires no privileges or user interaction, the impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is limited to low levels. The vulnerability could potentially allow attackers to read, modify, or delete sensitive employee data, or escalate their access within the system. Although no public exploits are currently known to be actively used in the wild, the disclosure of the exploit code increases the risk of exploitation. The lack of available patches or vendor advisories at this time further exacerbates the threat. Given that employee management systems typically store sensitive personal and organizational data, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to data confidentiality and system integrity.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 1 Jul 2025, 15:54 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats