CVE-2025-7754VulnerabilityPublished 17 Jul 2025

CVE-2025-7754: code-projects Patient Record Management System · SQL Injection

Affects code-projects Patient Record Management SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 08:30 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 32% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 17 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
code-projects Patient Record Management System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Immediate mitigation steps include: 1) Conducting an urgent inventory to identify any deployments of code-projects Patient Record Management System version 1.0 within the organization. 2) Restricting network access to the affected application, especially the /xray_form.php endpoint, using firewalls or web application firewalls (WAFs) to block malicious payloads targeting the 'itr_no' parameter. 3) Implementing input validation and parameterized queries or prepared statements in the application code to prevent SQL Injection if source code access and modification are possible. 4) Monitoring logs for unusual database queries or repeated access attempts to the vulnerable endpoint. 5) Engaging with the vendor or community to obtain patches or updates; if unavailable, consider upgrading to a newer, unaffected version or migrating to alternative systems. 6) Applying strict access controls and network segmentation to limit exposure of the patient record system. 7) Educating IT and security teams about the vulnerability and potential indicators of compromise. These measures should be prioritized given the sensitive nature of the data and the public disclosure of the exploit.

Description

A vulnerability was found in code-projects Patient Record Management System 1.0. It has been declared as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /xray_form.php. The manipulation of the argument itr_no leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Impact

For European organizations, the exploitation of this SQL Injection vulnerability could have severe consequences. Patient record management systems contain highly sensitive personal health information protected under GDPR and other privacy regulations. Unauthorized access or data breaches could lead to significant legal penalties, reputational damage, and loss of patient trust. Additionally, manipulation or deletion of medical records could disrupt healthcare delivery, potentially endangering patient safety. The remote and unauthenticated nature of the exploit increases the likelihood of attacks, including automated scanning and exploitation by cybercriminals or state-sponsored actors. Healthcare providers, clinics, and hospitals using this vulnerable system may face operational disruptions and costly incident response efforts. Furthermore, the exposure of health data could facilitate further targeted attacks such as identity theft or insurance fraud. The medium CVSS score reflects some limitations in exploit impact or complexity, but the criticality of the data involved amplifies the real-world risk for European healthcare entities.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 17 Jul 2025, 20:31 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats