Skip to main content
CVE-2026-106072VulnerabilityPublished 10/25/2026

A flaw in Node.js TLS hostname verification allows a certificate with only a DNS SAN to authenticate an IP endpoint…

Affects Microsoft Security Response Center MicrosoftSource GCVE Database

0
Authoritative record:CVE-2026-106072· Medium 6.7

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.7 Medium.

Data as of 10/25/2026, 12:14:33 UTC

CVSS base score
6.7Medium
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
Exploitation

Not in CISA KEV, no exploitation reported

What to do

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
Microsoft Security Response Center MicrosoftAffected
  • =3.0
Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Until a fix is available, users should be cautious when relying on TLS hostname verification for IP endpoints in Node.js 3.0 and consider additional validation controls if possible.

Description

A vulnerability in Node.js TLS hostname verification allows a certificate containing only a DNS Subject Alternative Name (SAN) to authenticate an IP endpoint improperly. This flaw could lead to incorrect validation of TLS connections when IP addresses are used instead of hostnames.

Impact

This vulnerability may allow an attacker to present a certificate with a DNS SAN and have it accepted as valid for an IP address endpoint, potentially enabling man-in-the-middle attacks or unauthorized access if TLS connections rely on hostname verification for security. However, there is no indication of known exploits in the wild at this time.

Summary

The vulnerability identified as CVE-2026-106072 affects Node.js version 3.0. It involves a flaw in the TLS hostname verification process where a certificate that includes only a DNS SAN can be used to authenticate an IP endpoint. This means that the TLS client may accept a certificate as valid for an IP address even though the certificate does not explicitly include the IP address in its SAN fields, violating proper hostname verification rules. The weakness is related to CWE-295 (Improper Certificate Validation). No CVSS score or detailed exploit information is provided.

Weaknesses

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…