Course-tencent-cloud before 2.0.2 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability that allows
Source GCVE Database
Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium : upgrade to 2.0.2 when convenient.
Data as of 15 Nov 2026, 16:53 UTC
Thin evidence
One scorer or none| CNA (VulnCheck) | CVSS 4.0 | 6.9 |
|---|---|---|
| CNA (VulnCheck) | CVSS 3.1 | 5.3 |
- Patch
- Available – fixed in 2.0.2
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NExploitation evidence
Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 15 Nov 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors
A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 14 Nov 2026.
What to do
Upgrade course-tencent-cloud to 2.0.2.
Affected software
| Product | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| xiaochong0302course-tencent-cloud | Affected
| Fixed in
|
GitHubcourse-tencent-cloudpkg:github/course-tencent-cloudOther threats | Affected
| Fixed in
|
Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.
AI-suggested
Since the vulnerability is fixed in version 2.0.2, upgrading to version 2.0.2 or later is recommended once available. Until then, restricting access to the /api/refund/confirm endpoint or implementing additional authorization checks to validate user access to order information can mitigate the risk. Monitor vendor advisories for official fixes.
Description
Course-tencent-cloud versions before 2.0.2 have an insecure direct object reference (IDOR) vulnerability. This flaw allows unauthenticated attackers to access refund preview information of other users by supplying an order serial number (sn) to the /api/refund/confirm endpoint. Attackers can derive valid sn values from Sqids-encoded sequential order IDs using the default key, exposing ordered items, prices, refund amounts, fees, and deadlines.
References
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-129469 (opens in a new tab)
- github.com/xiaochong0302/course-tencent-cloud/issues/38 (opens in a new tab)
- github.com/xiaochong0302/course-tencent-cloud/commit/8e8bcb4e13795006e16d51158790ce3120c8164a (opens in a new tab)
- github.com/xiaochong0302/course-tencent-cloud/blob/v2.0.1/app/Http/Api/Controllers/RefundController.php (opens in a new tab)
- github.com/xiaochong0302/course-tencent-cloud/blob/v2.0.1/app/Http/Home/Controllers/RefundController.php (opens in a new tab)
- hackmd.io/@hieund/course-tencent-cloud-refund-confirm-missing-owner-check-idor (opens in a new tab)
- vulncheck.com/advisories/course-tencent-cloud-before-2.0.2-idor-via-api-refund-confirm (opens in a new tab)