CVE-2026-61702VulnerabilityPublished 15 Oct 2026Updated 28 Oct 2026

Cups: Prior to 2.4.20, copy_banner()

Affects cupsSource GCVE Database

Authoritative record:CVE-2026-61702· Medium 5.3

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium · fixed in 2.4.20 : update cups when convenient.

Data as of 28 Oct 2026, 22:28 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

Patch: Available – fixed in 2.4.20

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 15 Oct 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Ubuntu 26.10cups`pkg:deb/ubuntu/cups?arch=source&distro=stonking`Other threats	Affected =2.4.16-1ubuntu1 =2.4.16-1ubuntu3	Fixed in–
Ubuntu 26.04 LTScups`pkg:deb/ubuntu/cups?arch=source&distro=resolute`Other threats	Affected 2.4.12-0ubuntu3 – 2.4.16-1ubuntu1.3 5 affected builds	Fixed in–
Ubuntu 24.04 LTScups`pkg:deb/ubuntu/cups?arch=source&distro=noble`Other threats	Affected 2.4.6-0ubuntu3 – 2.4.7-1.2ubuntu7.14 12 affected builds	Fixed in–
Ubuntu 22.04 LTScups`pkg:deb/ubuntu/cups?arch=source&distro=jammy`Other threats	Affected 2.3.3op2-7ubuntu2 – 2.4.1op1-1ubuntu4.21 19 affected builds	Fixed in–
Ubuntu Pro 20.04 LTScups`pkg:deb/ubuntu/cups?arch=source&distro=esm-infra/focal`Other threats	Affected 2.2.12-2ubuntu1 – 2.3.1-9ubuntu1.9+esm4 21 affected builds	Fixed in–
Ubuntu Pro 18.04 LTScups`pkg:deb/ubuntu/cups?arch=source&distro=esm-infra/bionic`Other threats	Affected 2.2.4-7ubuntu2 – 2.2.7-1ubuntu2.10+esm10 27 affected builds	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

Description

OpenPrinting CUPS is an open source printing system for Linux and other Unix-like operating systems. Prior to 2.4.20, copy_banner() in scheduler/ipp.c uses the attacker-controlled IPP attributes-natural-language value as a directory component beneath DataDir/banners when processing a job-sheets banner. The job-sheets value must first match a registered banner basename, and the traversed path must contain a matching reachable basename; selecting an arbitrary target as demonstrated additionally requires pre-positioned path state such as a symlink with that basename. Subject to the scheduler's filesystem and sandbox access, path separators in the language value can escape the intended banner directory, make the root scheduler open the reachable file, and copy its bytes into a job-sheet spool object that a configured backend can deliver to an attacker-observable endpoint. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.20.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…