CVE-1999-0614: Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is sol
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The FTP service is running.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0614 is a rejected vulnerability candidate originally associated with the presence of an FTP service running on a system. The candidate was rejected because it does not describe a direct security vulnerability but rather a configuration state. Specifically, the existence of an FTP service alone does not inherently constitute a security flaw; instead, it is a configuration detail that may be relevant for security posture assessments. The National Vulnerability Database (NVD) indicates that this candidate was removed from consideration as a vulnerability and is more appropriately classified under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE), which catalogs system configurations rather than exploitable vulnerabilities. There are no affected versions, no patches, no known exploits, and no detailed technical information about any security impact. The original description was minimal, simply noting that the FTP service was running, which by itself is not a vulnerability but could be a factor in a broader security context if the FTP service is misconfigured or outdated. Therefore, this entry does not represent an active or exploitable security threat.
Potential Impact
Since CVE-1999-0614 does not describe an actual vulnerability but rather a configuration state, it does not directly impact the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of systems. For European organizations, the presence of an FTP service might be a security consideration only if the service is improperly configured, outdated, or uses insecure protocols (such as plain FTP without encryption). However, this CVE entry itself does not provide any indication of such risks. Consequently, there is no direct impact from this CVE. Organizations should instead focus on ensuring secure configurations and up-to-date software for any FTP services they operate, as insecure FTP configurations can lead to data exposure or unauthorized access.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given that CVE-1999-0614 is not a valid vulnerability but a configuration note, mitigation should focus on best practices for FTP service management rather than addressing a specific flaw. European organizations should: 1) Avoid running FTP services unless absolutely necessary. 2) If FTP is required, use secure alternatives such as FTPS or SFTP to encrypt data in transit. 3) Regularly audit and harden FTP server configurations to disable anonymous access and enforce strong authentication. 4) Monitor FTP service logs for suspicious activity. 5) Keep FTP server software up to date with the latest security patches. 6) Consider network segmentation and firewall rules to restrict FTP access to trusted hosts only. These steps help mitigate risks associated with running FTP services, even though this CVE does not identify a direct vulnerability.
CVE-1999-0614: Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is sol
Description
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The FTP service is running.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0614 is a rejected vulnerability candidate originally associated with the presence of an FTP service running on a system. The candidate was rejected because it does not describe a direct security vulnerability but rather a configuration state. Specifically, the existence of an FTP service alone does not inherently constitute a security flaw; instead, it is a configuration detail that may be relevant for security posture assessments. The National Vulnerability Database (NVD) indicates that this candidate was removed from consideration as a vulnerability and is more appropriately classified under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE), which catalogs system configurations rather than exploitable vulnerabilities. There are no affected versions, no patches, no known exploits, and no detailed technical information about any security impact. The original description was minimal, simply noting that the FTP service was running, which by itself is not a vulnerability but could be a factor in a broader security context if the FTP service is misconfigured or outdated. Therefore, this entry does not represent an active or exploitable security threat.
Potential Impact
Since CVE-1999-0614 does not describe an actual vulnerability but rather a configuration state, it does not directly impact the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of systems. For European organizations, the presence of an FTP service might be a security consideration only if the service is improperly configured, outdated, or uses insecure protocols (such as plain FTP without encryption). However, this CVE entry itself does not provide any indication of such risks. Consequently, there is no direct impact from this CVE. Organizations should instead focus on ensuring secure configurations and up-to-date software for any FTP services they operate, as insecure FTP configurations can lead to data exposure or unauthorized access.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given that CVE-1999-0614 is not a valid vulnerability but a configuration note, mitigation should focus on best practices for FTP service management rather than addressing a specific flaw. European organizations should: 1) Avoid running FTP services unless absolutely necessary. 2) If FTP is required, use secure alternatives such as FTPS or SFTP to encrypt data in transit. 3) Regularly audit and harden FTP server configurations to disable anonymous access and enforce strong authentication. 4) Monitor FTP service logs for suspicious activity. 5) Keep FTP server software up to date with the latest security patches. 6) Consider network segmentation and firewall rules to restrict FTP access to trusted hosts only. These steps help mitigate risks associated with running FTP services, even though this CVE does not identify a direct vulnerability.
Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7decb3
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 8:55:18 PM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 11:07:14 AM
Views: 34
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-2083: SQL Injection in code-projects Social Networking Site
MediumCVE-2026-2082: OS Command Injection in D-Link DIR-823X
MediumCVE-2026-2079: Improper Authorization in yeqifu warehouse
MediumCVE-2026-1675: CWE-1188 Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default in brstefanovic Advanced Country Blocker
MediumCVE-2026-1643: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in ariagle MP-Ukagaka
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.