CVE-1999-0643: Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is sol
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The IMAP service is running.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0643 is a rejected CVE candidate that was originally intended to describe a configuration issue related to the IMAP service running on a system. The candidate was rejected because it does not represent a direct security vulnerability but rather a configuration state that may be better addressed under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE) framework. The original description simply noted that the IMAP service was running, which by itself is not a vulnerability but a condition that could potentially increase the attack surface if the service is misconfigured or unpatched. Since no specific exploit or vulnerability details exist for this CVE, it does not represent an actionable security threat. There are no affected versions, no patches, and no known exploits in the wild associated with this identifier. The classification as 'medium' severity appears to be a placeholder rather than an assessment based on technical risk. Overall, this CVE entry serves as a historical note rather than a current or exploitable security issue.
Potential Impact
Given that CVE-1999-0643 does not describe a direct vulnerability but rather a configuration state (the IMAP service running), the potential impact on European organizations is minimal to none from this specific entry. However, running IMAP services without proper security controls can expose organizations to risks such as unauthorized access, interception of credentials, or exploitation of other vulnerabilities in the IMAP implementation. European organizations that operate mail servers using IMAP should ensure their services are securely configured, patched, and monitored. The CVE itself does not provide new or specific threat intelligence, so it does not change the existing risk posture. The impact is therefore indirect and depends on the actual security posture of the IMAP services in use rather than this CVE.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since this CVE does not represent a direct vulnerability, mitigation focuses on best practices for managing IMAP services: 1) Ensure IMAP servers are fully patched with the latest security updates from the vendor. 2) Disable IMAP services if not required to reduce attack surface. 3) Enforce strong authentication mechanisms, such as multi-factor authentication, for accessing mail services. 4) Use encrypted connections (e.g., IMAPS over TLS) to protect credentials and data in transit. 5) Regularly audit and monitor IMAP service configurations and logs for suspicious activity. 6) Apply network segmentation and firewall rules to restrict IMAP access to trusted networks and users. These measures go beyond generic advice by emphasizing configuration hygiene and operational security around IMAP services.
CVE-1999-0643: Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is sol
Description
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The IMAP service is running.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0643 is a rejected CVE candidate that was originally intended to describe a configuration issue related to the IMAP service running on a system. The candidate was rejected because it does not represent a direct security vulnerability but rather a configuration state that may be better addressed under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE) framework. The original description simply noted that the IMAP service was running, which by itself is not a vulnerability but a condition that could potentially increase the attack surface if the service is misconfigured or unpatched. Since no specific exploit or vulnerability details exist for this CVE, it does not represent an actionable security threat. There are no affected versions, no patches, and no known exploits in the wild associated with this identifier. The classification as 'medium' severity appears to be a placeholder rather than an assessment based on technical risk. Overall, this CVE entry serves as a historical note rather than a current or exploitable security issue.
Potential Impact
Given that CVE-1999-0643 does not describe a direct vulnerability but rather a configuration state (the IMAP service running), the potential impact on European organizations is minimal to none from this specific entry. However, running IMAP services without proper security controls can expose organizations to risks such as unauthorized access, interception of credentials, or exploitation of other vulnerabilities in the IMAP implementation. European organizations that operate mail servers using IMAP should ensure their services are securely configured, patched, and monitored. The CVE itself does not provide new or specific threat intelligence, so it does not change the existing risk posture. The impact is therefore indirect and depends on the actual security posture of the IMAP services in use rather than this CVE.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since this CVE does not represent a direct vulnerability, mitigation focuses on best practices for managing IMAP services: 1) Ensure IMAP servers are fully patched with the latest security updates from the vendor. 2) Disable IMAP services if not required to reduce attack surface. 3) Enforce strong authentication mechanisms, such as multi-factor authentication, for accessing mail services. 4) Use encrypted connections (e.g., IMAPS over TLS) to protect credentials and data in transit. 5) Regularly audit and monitor IMAP service configurations and logs for suspicious activity. 6) Apply network segmentation and firewall rules to restrict IMAP access to trusted networks and users. These measures go beyond generic advice by emphasizing configuration hygiene and operational security around IMAP services.
Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7decfd
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 8:27:05 PM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 6:54:30 AM
Views: 39
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-2076: Improper Authorization in yeqifu warehouse
MediumCVE-2025-15267: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in boldthemes Bold Page Builder
MediumCVE-2025-13463: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in boldthemes Bold Page Builder
MediumCVE-2025-12803: CWE-80 Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) in boldthemes Bold Page Builder
MediumCVE-2025-12159: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in boldthemes Bold Page Builder
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.