CVE-1999-0969: The Windows NT RPC service allows remote attackers to conduct a denial of service using spoofed malf
The Windows NT RPC service allows remote attackers to conduct a denial of service using spoofed malformed RPC packets which generate an error message that is sent to the spoofed host, potentially setting up a loop, aka Snork.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0969 is a vulnerability in the Windows NT 4.0 operating system's Remote Procedure Call (RPC) service. This flaw allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition by sending spoofed, malformed RPC packets to the target system. When the RPC service processes these malformed packets, it generates an error messages that are sent back to the spoofed source address. This behavior can potentially create a feedback loop, where error messages continuously bounce between the victim and the spoofed host, amplifying the denial of service effect. The vulnerability exploits the lack of proper validation and handling of malformed RPC requests, which leads to resource exhaustion or service disruption. The CVSS score of 5.0 (medium severity) reflects that the attack can be performed remotely without authentication, requires low attack complexity, and impacts availability only, without compromising confidentiality or integrity. A patch addressing this vulnerability was released by Microsoft in 1998 (MS98-014), which fixes the RPC service to properly handle malformed packets and prevent the error message loop. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, likely due to the age of the vulnerability and the obsolescence of Windows NT 4.0 in modern environments.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability is the potential disruption of critical services running on legacy Windows NT 4.0 systems. Although Windows NT 4.0 is largely obsolete and unsupported, some industrial control systems, legacy applications, or specialized environments might still rely on it. A successful DoS attack could lead to downtime, affecting business continuity and operational processes. This could be particularly damaging in sectors such as manufacturing, utilities, or government agencies where legacy systems remain in use. Additionally, the spoofing aspect of the attack could complicate incident response and attribution. However, the lack of confidentiality or integrity impact limits the scope of damage to availability only. Modern Windows versions are not affected, so organizations that have migrated away from Windows NT 4.0 are not at risk from this vulnerability.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should ensure that any remaining Windows NT 4.0 systems are fully patched with the MS98-014 update to remediate this vulnerability. Given the age and unsupported status of Windows NT 4.0, the most effective mitigation is to phase out these legacy systems and migrate to supported, modern operating systems that receive regular security updates. Network-level controls can also help reduce risk: implementing ingress and egress filtering to block spoofed IP packets can prevent attackers from sending malformed RPC packets with spoofed source addresses. Additionally, segmenting legacy systems from the broader network and restricting RPC traffic to trusted hosts can limit exposure. Monitoring network traffic for unusual RPC error message patterns may help detect attempted exploitation. Finally, organizations should maintain an inventory of legacy systems and assess their exposure to known vulnerabilities regularly.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands
CVE-1999-0969: The Windows NT RPC service allows remote attackers to conduct a denial of service using spoofed malf
Description
The Windows NT RPC service allows remote attackers to conduct a denial of service using spoofed malformed RPC packets which generate an error message that is sent to the spoofed host, potentially setting up a loop, aka Snork.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0969 is a vulnerability in the Windows NT 4.0 operating system's Remote Procedure Call (RPC) service. This flaw allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition by sending spoofed, malformed RPC packets to the target system. When the RPC service processes these malformed packets, it generates an error messages that are sent back to the spoofed source address. This behavior can potentially create a feedback loop, where error messages continuously bounce between the victim and the spoofed host, amplifying the denial of service effect. The vulnerability exploits the lack of proper validation and handling of malformed RPC requests, which leads to resource exhaustion or service disruption. The CVSS score of 5.0 (medium severity) reflects that the attack can be performed remotely without authentication, requires low attack complexity, and impacts availability only, without compromising confidentiality or integrity. A patch addressing this vulnerability was released by Microsoft in 1998 (MS98-014), which fixes the RPC service to properly handle malformed packets and prevent the error message loop. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, likely due to the age of the vulnerability and the obsolescence of Windows NT 4.0 in modern environments.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability is the potential disruption of critical services running on legacy Windows NT 4.0 systems. Although Windows NT 4.0 is largely obsolete and unsupported, some industrial control systems, legacy applications, or specialized environments might still rely on it. A successful DoS attack could lead to downtime, affecting business continuity and operational processes. This could be particularly damaging in sectors such as manufacturing, utilities, or government agencies where legacy systems remain in use. Additionally, the spoofing aspect of the attack could complicate incident response and attribution. However, the lack of confidentiality or integrity impact limits the scope of damage to availability only. Modern Windows versions are not affected, so organizations that have migrated away from Windows NT 4.0 are not at risk from this vulnerability.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should ensure that any remaining Windows NT 4.0 systems are fully patched with the MS98-014 update to remediate this vulnerability. Given the age and unsupported status of Windows NT 4.0, the most effective mitigation is to phase out these legacy systems and migrate to supported, modern operating systems that receive regular security updates. Network-level controls can also help reduce risk: implementing ingress and egress filtering to block spoofed IP packets can prevent attackers from sending malformed RPC packets with spoofed source addresses. Additionally, segmenting legacy systems from the broader network and restricting RPC traffic to trusted hosts can limit exposure. Monitoring network traffic for unusual RPC error message patterns may help detect attempted exploitation. Finally, organizations should maintain an inventory of legacy systems and assess their exposure to known vulnerabilities regularly.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Patch Information
Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7dead1
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 9:40:08 PM
Last updated: 8/13/2025, 10:50:32 PM
Views: 11
Related Threats
CVE-2025-8878: CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') in properfraction Paid Membership Plugin, Ecommerce, User Registration Form, Login Form, User Profile & Restrict Content – ProfilePress
MediumCVE-2025-8143: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in pencidesign Soledad
MediumCVE-2025-8719: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in reubenthiessen Translate This gTranslate Shortcode
MediumCVE-2025-8464: CWE-23 Relative Path Traversal in glenwpcoder Drag and Drop Multiple File Upload for Contact Form 7
MediumCVE-2025-7499: CWE-862 Missing Authorization in wpdevteam BetterDocs – Advanced AI-Driven Documentation, FAQ & Knowledge Base Tool for Elementor & Gutenberg with Encyclopedia, AI Support, Instant Answers
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.