CVE-1999-1290: Buffer overflow in nftp FTP client version 1.40 allows remote malicious FTP servers to cause a denia
Buffer overflow in nftp FTP client version 1.40 allows remote malicious FTP servers to cause a denial of service, and possibly execute arbitrary commands, via a long response string.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-1290 is a buffer overflow vulnerability found in version 1.40 of the nftp FTP client, a software used to connect to FTP servers for file transfers. The vulnerability arises when the client processes an excessively long response string sent by a remote FTP server. Specifically, the client does not properly validate or limit the length of the response, leading to a buffer overflow condition. This overflow can cause the client application to crash, resulting in a denial of service (DoS). Furthermore, due to the nature of buffer overflows, there is a potential for an attacker controlling the malicious FTP server to execute arbitrary code on the client machine, although this is less certain. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable without authentication, meaning any attacker hosting a malicious FTP server can trigger it simply by having a victim connect to their server. The CVSS score of 5.1 (medium severity) reflects the moderate complexity of exploitation (high attack complexity) and the partial impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No patch is available for this vulnerability, and there are no known exploits in the wild documented. Given the age of the vulnerability (published in 1999) and the specific affected product (nftp 1.40), this issue primarily affects legacy systems still running this outdated FTP client software.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends heavily on whether nftp 1.40 is still in use within their environments. If so, the vulnerability could allow attackers operating malicious FTP servers to disrupt operations by causing client crashes (denial of service) or potentially execute arbitrary commands on client machines, leading to compromise of sensitive data or further network infiltration. This could affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability of systems involved in FTP file transfers. Given the vulnerability requires no authentication and can be triggered remotely, it poses a risk especially in environments where users connect to external or untrusted FTP servers. However, the lack of known exploits and the obsolescence of the affected software reduce the likelihood of widespread impact. European organizations in sectors relying on legacy FTP clients for file transfers, such as industrial control systems, research institutions, or government agencies with legacy infrastructure, may be more vulnerable. The potential impact includes operational disruption, data leakage, and foothold establishment by attackers.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no patch is available for this vulnerability, mitigation must focus on compensating controls. Organizations should: 1) Identify and inventory any use of nftp FTP client version 1.40 within their environment and plan to replace it with modern, actively maintained FTP clients that properly handle server responses. 2) Restrict FTP client connections to trusted FTP servers only, using network segmentation and firewall rules to block connections to untrusted or external FTP servers. 3) Employ network monitoring to detect anomalous FTP server responses or client crashes indicative of exploitation attempts. 4) Educate users about the risks of connecting to unknown FTP servers and enforce policies to prevent such connections. 5) Where possible, transition to more secure file transfer protocols such as SFTP or FTPS that provide encryption and stronger client-server validation. 6) Implement endpoint protection and application whitelisting to limit the impact of potential arbitrary code execution. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on legacy software identification, network controls, and user behavior management tailored to this specific vulnerability context.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands
CVE-1999-1290: Buffer overflow in nftp FTP client version 1.40 allows remote malicious FTP servers to cause a denia
Description
Buffer overflow in nftp FTP client version 1.40 allows remote malicious FTP servers to cause a denial of service, and possibly execute arbitrary commands, via a long response string.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-1290 is a buffer overflow vulnerability found in version 1.40 of the nftp FTP client, a software used to connect to FTP servers for file transfers. The vulnerability arises when the client processes an excessively long response string sent by a remote FTP server. Specifically, the client does not properly validate or limit the length of the response, leading to a buffer overflow condition. This overflow can cause the client application to crash, resulting in a denial of service (DoS). Furthermore, due to the nature of buffer overflows, there is a potential for an attacker controlling the malicious FTP server to execute arbitrary code on the client machine, although this is less certain. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable without authentication, meaning any attacker hosting a malicious FTP server can trigger it simply by having a victim connect to their server. The CVSS score of 5.1 (medium severity) reflects the moderate complexity of exploitation (high attack complexity) and the partial impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No patch is available for this vulnerability, and there are no known exploits in the wild documented. Given the age of the vulnerability (published in 1999) and the specific affected product (nftp 1.40), this issue primarily affects legacy systems still running this outdated FTP client software.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends heavily on whether nftp 1.40 is still in use within their environments. If so, the vulnerability could allow attackers operating malicious FTP servers to disrupt operations by causing client crashes (denial of service) or potentially execute arbitrary commands on client machines, leading to compromise of sensitive data or further network infiltration. This could affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability of systems involved in FTP file transfers. Given the vulnerability requires no authentication and can be triggered remotely, it poses a risk especially in environments where users connect to external or untrusted FTP servers. However, the lack of known exploits and the obsolescence of the affected software reduce the likelihood of widespread impact. European organizations in sectors relying on legacy FTP clients for file transfers, such as industrial control systems, research institutions, or government agencies with legacy infrastructure, may be more vulnerable. The potential impact includes operational disruption, data leakage, and foothold establishment by attackers.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no patch is available for this vulnerability, mitigation must focus on compensating controls. Organizations should: 1) Identify and inventory any use of nftp FTP client version 1.40 within their environment and plan to replace it with modern, actively maintained FTP clients that properly handle server responses. 2) Restrict FTP client connections to trusted FTP servers only, using network segmentation and firewall rules to block connections to untrusted or external FTP servers. 3) Employ network monitoring to detect anomalous FTP server responses or client crashes indicative of exploitation attempts. 4) Educate users about the risks of connecting to unknown FTP servers and enforce policies to prevent such connections. 5) Where possible, transition to more secure file transfer protocols such as SFTP or FTPS that provide encryption and stronger client-server validation. 6) Implement endpoint protection and application whitelisting to limit the impact of potential arbitrary code execution. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on legacy software identification, network controls, and user behavior management tailored to this specific vulnerability context.
Affected Countries
Threat ID: 682ca32db6fd31d6ed7df614
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:41 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 11:40:49 AM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 2:26:49 AM
Views: 38
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-2069: Stack-based Buffer Overflow in ggml-org llama.cpp
MediumCVE-2026-25760: CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in BishopFox sliver
MediumCVE-2026-25574: CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in payloadcms payload
MediumCVE-2026-25516: CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in zauberzeug nicegui
MediumCVE-2026-25581: CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in samclarke SCEditor
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.