CVE-2000-0508: rpc.lockd in Red Hat Linux 6.1 and 6.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a ma
rpc.lockd in Red Hat Linux 6.1 and 6.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a malformed request.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2000-0508 is a vulnerability affecting the rpc.lockd service in Red Hat Linux versions 6.1 and 6.2, as well as other related Debian Linux versions (2.1, 2.2, 6.0, 7.0). The rpc.lockd daemon is part of the Network File System (NFS) locking mechanism, responsible for managing file locks over the network to ensure data consistency when multiple clients access shared files. This vulnerability arises from the daemon's improper handling of malformed remote procedure call (RPC) requests. Specifically, an attacker can send a crafted malformed request to the rpc.lockd service, which causes the service to crash or become unresponsive, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. The CVSS v2 score of 5.0 (medium severity) reflects that the attack can be launched remotely without authentication (AV:N, AC:L, Au:N), and it impacts availability only (A:P), with no confidentiality or integrity impact. The vulnerability dates back to the mid-1990s and affects legacy Linux distributions that are now considered obsolete and unsupported. No patches are available for this vulnerability, and there are no known exploits in the wild. However, the underlying issue highlights the risks of exposing critical network services like rpc.lockd to untrusted networks. Given the age of the affected software, modern Linux distributions have addressed this issue or replaced the vulnerable components with more secure implementations.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the direct impact of this vulnerability today is minimal due to the obsolescence of the affected Linux versions (Red Hat 6.1/6.2 and early Debian releases). However, if legacy systems running these outdated distributions are still operational within critical infrastructure, research institutions, or industrial environments, they could be susceptible to remote denial of service attacks that disrupt NFS file locking services. Such disruption could lead to application failures, data access issues, and potential downtime in environments relying heavily on NFS for file sharing. The availability impact could affect business continuity, especially in sectors like manufacturing, scientific computing, or government agencies where legacy systems persist. Additionally, the lack of patches and known exploits suggests that while exploitation is theoretically possible, it is unlikely to be widespread. Nonetheless, the presence of unpatched legacy systems in European organizations could pose a risk vector for targeted DoS attacks, particularly in scenarios where network segmentation is weak or where rpc.lockd is exposed to untrusted networks.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given the absence of official patches, European organizations should prioritize the following mitigations: 1) Upgrade or migrate legacy Linux systems to supported, modern distributions that have addressed this vulnerability and provide ongoing security updates. 2) Implement strict network segmentation and firewall rules to restrict access to rpc.lockd and related NFS services, limiting exposure to trusted internal networks only. 3) Disable the rpc.lockd service on systems where NFS file locking is not required to reduce the attack surface. 4) Monitor network traffic for unusual or malformed RPC requests targeting rpc.lockd, using intrusion detection systems (IDS) or network anomaly detection tools. 5) Conduct audits to identify any legacy systems still running vulnerable versions and develop a decommission or upgrade plan. 6) Employ redundancy and failover mechanisms for critical NFS services to minimize downtime in case of DoS attacks. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on legacy system management, network controls specific to rpc.lockd, and proactive monitoring tailored to this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Poland
CVE-2000-0508: rpc.lockd in Red Hat Linux 6.1 and 6.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a ma
Description
rpc.lockd in Red Hat Linux 6.1 and 6.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a malformed request.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2000-0508 is a vulnerability affecting the rpc.lockd service in Red Hat Linux versions 6.1 and 6.2, as well as other related Debian Linux versions (2.1, 2.2, 6.0, 7.0). The rpc.lockd daemon is part of the Network File System (NFS) locking mechanism, responsible for managing file locks over the network to ensure data consistency when multiple clients access shared files. This vulnerability arises from the daemon's improper handling of malformed remote procedure call (RPC) requests. Specifically, an attacker can send a crafted malformed request to the rpc.lockd service, which causes the service to crash or become unresponsive, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. The CVSS v2 score of 5.0 (medium severity) reflects that the attack can be launched remotely without authentication (AV:N, AC:L, Au:N), and it impacts availability only (A:P), with no confidentiality or integrity impact. The vulnerability dates back to the mid-1990s and affects legacy Linux distributions that are now considered obsolete and unsupported. No patches are available for this vulnerability, and there are no known exploits in the wild. However, the underlying issue highlights the risks of exposing critical network services like rpc.lockd to untrusted networks. Given the age of the affected software, modern Linux distributions have addressed this issue or replaced the vulnerable components with more secure implementations.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the direct impact of this vulnerability today is minimal due to the obsolescence of the affected Linux versions (Red Hat 6.1/6.2 and early Debian releases). However, if legacy systems running these outdated distributions are still operational within critical infrastructure, research institutions, or industrial environments, they could be susceptible to remote denial of service attacks that disrupt NFS file locking services. Such disruption could lead to application failures, data access issues, and potential downtime in environments relying heavily on NFS for file sharing. The availability impact could affect business continuity, especially in sectors like manufacturing, scientific computing, or government agencies where legacy systems persist. Additionally, the lack of patches and known exploits suggests that while exploitation is theoretically possible, it is unlikely to be widespread. Nonetheless, the presence of unpatched legacy systems in European organizations could pose a risk vector for targeted DoS attacks, particularly in scenarios where network segmentation is weak or where rpc.lockd is exposed to untrusted networks.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given the absence of official patches, European organizations should prioritize the following mitigations: 1) Upgrade or migrate legacy Linux systems to supported, modern distributions that have addressed this vulnerability and provide ongoing security updates. 2) Implement strict network segmentation and firewall rules to restrict access to rpc.lockd and related NFS services, limiting exposure to trusted internal networks only. 3) Disable the rpc.lockd service on systems where NFS file locking is not required to reduce the attack surface. 4) Monitor network traffic for unusual or malformed RPC requests targeting rpc.lockd, using intrusion detection systems (IDS) or network anomaly detection tools. 5) Conduct audits to identify any legacy systems still running vulnerable versions and develop a decommission or upgrade plan. 6) Employ redundancy and failover mechanisms for critical NFS services to minimize downtime in case of DoS attacks. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on legacy system management, network controls specific to rpc.lockd, and proactive monitoring tailored to this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Threat ID: 682ca32ab6fd31d6ed7de45a
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:38 PM
Last enriched: 7/2/2025, 1:58:13 AM
Last updated: 7/31/2025, 11:13:57 PM
Views: 11
Related Threats
CVE-2025-9090: Command Injection in Tenda AC20
MediumCVE-2025-8878: CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') in properfraction Paid Membership Plugin, Ecommerce, User Registration Form, Login Form, User Profile & Restrict Content – ProfilePress
MediumCVE-2025-8143: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in pencidesign Soledad
MediumCVE-2025-8719: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in reubenthiessen Translate This gTranslate Shortcode
MediumCVE-2025-8464: CWE-23 Relative Path Traversal in glenwpcoder Drag and Drop Multiple File Upload for Contact Form 7
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.