VulnerabilityPublished 25 Apr 2018Updated 30 May 2025

CVE-2018-10213: Vaultize Enterprise File Sharing

Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC

Severity

Medium

Rated Medium by the CNA (mitre) · No CVSS score from NVD or the CNA

EPSS: 0.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 48% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 25 Apr 2018
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
n/a n/a	Affected =17.05.31	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

To mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should apply any available patches or updates from Vaultize addressing this XSS issue. In the absence of a patch, administrators should implement strict input validation and output encoding on all user-supplied content in invitation emails to prevent HTML or script injection. Email clients and web interfaces should be configured to disable or limit the execution of active content in emails, such as JavaScript. User awareness training should emphasize caution when opening invitation emails, especially those with unexpected or suspicious content. Network-level protections like email filtering and sandboxing can help detect and block malicious payloads. Additionally, organizations should monitor logs for unusual invitation activity and consider restricting invitation sending privileges to trusted users only. Implementing Content Security Policy (CSP) headers in the web interface can further reduce the risk of script execution from injected content.

Description

An issue was discovered in Vaultize Enterprise File Sharing 17.05.31. There is XSS in invitation mail received from a different user, who can modify the HTML in that mail before sending it.

Impact

For European organizations using Vaultize Enterprise File Sharing, this vulnerability poses a risk to confidentiality and integrity of sensitive data. An attacker exploiting this XSS flaw could execute arbitrary scripts in the context of the victim's session, potentially leading to unauthorized access to shared files, theft of credentials, or further lateral movement within the enterprise network. This could result in data breaches, loss of intellectual property, or compliance violations under regulations such as GDPR. Additionally, the trust model of enterprise file sharing is undermined, as users may receive malicious invitations appearing to come from legitimate colleagues. While availability impact is limited, the reputational damage and operational disruption caused by a successful attack could be significant. The risk is heightened in environments where users frequently share files and collaborate via email invitations, making phishing and social engineering attacks more effective.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 8 Jul 2025, 14:57 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats