Skip to main content

CVE-2020-28607: CWE-129: Improper Validation of Array Index in CGAL Project libcgal

Medium
Published: Mon Apr 18 2022 (04/18/2022, 16:55:54 UTC)
Source: CVE
Vendor/Project: CGAL Project
Product: libcgal

Description

Multiple code execution vulnerabilities exists in the Nef polygon-parsing functionality of CGAL libcgal CGAL-5.1.1. A specially crafted malformed file can lead to an out-of-bounds read and type confusion, which could lead to code execution. An attacker can provide malicious input to trigger any of these vulnerabilities. An oob read vulnerability exists in Nef_2/PM_io_parser.h PM_io_parser<PMDEC>::read_face() set_halfedge().

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 06/23/2025, 13:05:42 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2020-28607 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting version 5.1.1 of the CGAL Project's libcgal library, specifically within the Nef polygon-parsing functionality. The root cause is improper validation of array indices (CWE-129) in the PM_io_parser<PMDEC>::read_face() and set_halfedge() functions, which leads to out-of-bounds (OOB) reads and type confusion. These memory safety issues arise when processing specially crafted malformed input files. An attacker can exploit these vulnerabilities by supplying maliciously crafted polygon files to applications that utilize libcgal for geometric computations. The OOB read can cause memory disclosure or corruption, and the type confusion can potentially lead to arbitrary code execution. The vulnerability does not require authentication but does require the attacker to provide input that is parsed by the vulnerable library. There are no known public exploits or patches available as of the published date, but the technical details indicate that the flaw resides in the parsing logic of polygon data structures, which are critical for applications relying on computational geometry. The absence of a patch increases the risk for users who process untrusted polygon data with libcgal 5.1.1. Given the complexity of the vulnerability and the potential for code execution, this issue warrants attention from developers and security teams using CGAL in their software stacks.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends on the extent to which libcgal 5.1.1 is integrated into their software infrastructure. CGAL is widely used in scientific computing, CAD (computer-aided design), GIS (geographic information systems), and other engineering applications. Organizations in sectors such as aerospace, automotive, manufacturing, and research institutions that rely on CGAL for geometric processing could face risks of data corruption, unauthorized code execution, or system compromise if they process untrusted polygon files. This could lead to intellectual property theft, disruption of critical design workflows, or compromise of sensitive research data. Since the vulnerability enables code execution without authentication, it could be exploited remotely if the vulnerable software processes files from external or untrusted sources. The lack of known exploits suggests limited active targeting, but the potential severity of arbitrary code execution means that organizations should proactively mitigate the risk. Additionally, disruption in engineering or manufacturing pipelines could have downstream economic impacts, especially in countries with strong industrial sectors.

Mitigation Recommendations

1. Immediate mitigation involves restricting or validating input sources: ensure that only trusted polygon files are processed by applications using libcgal. Implement strict file integrity checks and sandbox parsing operations to limit potential damage from malformed inputs. 2. Monitor vendor channels and CGAL project repositories for patches or updates addressing this vulnerability; apply updates promptly once available. 3. If feasible, upgrade to a later, patched version of CGAL that resolves this issue. 4. Employ runtime protections such as Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR), Data Execution Prevention (DEP), and control-flow integrity mechanisms to reduce exploitation success. 5. Conduct code audits and fuzz testing on the polygon parsing components to identify and remediate similar vulnerabilities proactively. 6. For critical systems, consider isolating or containerizing applications that use libcgal to contain potential compromise. 7. Implement network-level controls to limit exposure of services that process polygon files from untrusted networks. 8. Educate developers and users about the risks of processing untrusted input and encourage secure coding and handling practices.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
talos
Date Reserved
2020-11-13T00:00:00.000Z
Cisa Enriched
true

Threat ID: 682d9842c4522896dcbf29d9

Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:22 AM

Last enriched: 6/23/2025, 1:05:42 PM

Last updated: 7/25/2025, 11:46:51 AM

Views: 10

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats