Skip to main content

CVE-2020-28619: CWE-129: Improper Validation of Array Index in CGAL Project libcgal

Medium
Published: Mon Apr 18 2022 (04/18/2022, 16:56:13 UTC)
Source: CVE
Vendor/Project: CGAL Project
Product: libcgal

Description

Multiple code execution vulnerabilities exists in the Nef polygon-parsing functionality of CGAL libcgal CGAL-5.1.1. A specially crafted malformed file can lead to an out-of-bounds read and type confusion, which could lead to code execution. An attacker can provide malicious input to trigger any of these vulnerabilities. An oob read vulnerability exists in Nef_S2/SNC_io_parser.h SNC_io_parser<EW>::read_edge() eh->twin().

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 06/23/2025, 12:50:30 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2020-28619 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting the CGAL Project's libcgal library, specifically version 5.1.1. The vulnerability arises from improper validation of array indices (CWE-129) within the Nef polygon-parsing functionality. More precisely, the flaw exists in the SNC_io_parser<EW>::read_edge() function located in the Nef_S2/SNC_io_parser.h file. When processing specially crafted malformed polygon files, the parser performs an out-of-bounds (OOB) read operation on an array or data structure, leading to type confusion. This type confusion can potentially be exploited to achieve arbitrary code execution. The vulnerability is triggered by an attacker supplying maliciously crafted input files that exploit the lack of bounds checking on array indices. Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the nature of the vulnerability—out-of-bounds read combined with type confusion—makes it a significant risk for applications that rely on libcgal for geometric computations and polygon parsing. The vulnerability affects only CGAL version 5.1.1, and no official patch links have been provided yet. The improper validation of array indices can compromise memory safety, leading to potential control flow hijacking or data leakage. The attack vector requires the attacker to provide a malformed file to the vulnerable parser, which may be used in environments where polygon data is imported or processed from untrusted sources.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends largely on the extent to which libcgal 5.1.1 is integrated into their software stacks, particularly in industries relying on computational geometry, CAD, GIS, or scientific computing. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution, compromising the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of affected systems. This could result in unauthorized access to sensitive data, disruption of critical services, or use of compromised systems as footholds for further attacks. Organizations in sectors such as aerospace, automotive, manufacturing, and research institutions that use CGAL for geometric processing are at higher risk. Additionally, software vendors incorporating libcgal into their products could inadvertently distribute vulnerable versions, increasing the attack surface. Although no exploits are currently known in the wild, the potential for exploitation exists, especially if attackers develop weaponized inputs targeting this flaw. The medium severity rating suggests that while the vulnerability is serious, exploitation may require specific conditions such as the presence of vulnerable software and the ability to supply crafted input files. However, the consequences of exploitation could be severe, especially in environments where integrity and availability of geometric computations are critical.

Mitigation Recommendations

1. Immediate mitigation involves auditing all software and systems to identify usage of libcgal version 5.1.1, especially in components handling polygon parsing or geometric data processing. 2. Where possible, restrict or sanitize input sources to ensure that only trusted or validated polygon files are processed, reducing the risk of malicious input triggering the vulnerability. 3. Implement application-level input validation and sandboxing around the polygon parsing functionality to contain potential exploitation attempts. 4. Monitor vendor advisories and CGAL project updates for patches or newer versions that address this vulnerability, and plan prompt upgrades once available. 5. For software vendors using libcgal, consider recompiling or rebuilding with updated or patched versions, or temporarily disabling vulnerable features if feasible. 6. Employ runtime protections such as Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR), Data Execution Prevention (DEP), and Control Flow Integrity (CFI) to mitigate exploitation impact. 7. Conduct targeted penetration testing and fuzzing on polygon parsing components to detect and remediate similar input validation issues proactively. 8. Maintain robust logging and anomaly detection to identify suspicious file inputs or crashes related to polygon parsing.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
talos
Date Reserved
2020-11-13T00:00:00.000Z
Cisa Enriched
true

Threat ID: 682d9842c4522896dcbf2a36

Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:22 AM

Last enriched: 6/23/2025, 12:50:30 PM

Last updated: 8/11/2025, 6:52:10 PM

Views: 13

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats