Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2022-23632: CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation in traefik traefik

0
Medium
Published: Thu Feb 17 2022 (02/17/2022, 14:55:10 UTC)
Source: CVE
Vendor/Project: traefik
Product: traefik

Description

Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to version 2.6.1, Traefik skips the router transport layer security (TLS) configuration when the host header is a fully qualified domain name (FQDN). For a request, the TLS configuration choice can be different than the router choice, which implies the use of a wrong TLS configuration. When sending a request using FQDN handled by a router configured with a dedicated TLS configuration, the TLS configuration falls back to the default configuration that might not correspond to the configured one. If the CNAME flattening is enabled, the selected TLS configuration is the SNI one and the routing uses the CNAME value, so this can skip the expected TLS configuration. Version 2.6.1 contains a patch for this issue. As a workaround, one may add the FDQN to the host rule. However, there is no workaround if the CNAME flattening is enabled.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 06/23/2025, 16:17:53 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2022-23632 is a vulnerability in Traefik, an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer widely used to manage and route web traffic. The issue pertains to improper certificate validation (CWE-295) in versions prior to 2.6.1. Specifically, when a request uses a fully qualified domain name (FQDN) in the host header, Traefik skips the router-specific TLS configuration and instead falls back to a default TLS configuration. This behavior can cause the TLS configuration applied to a request to differ from the router’s intended TLS settings. The problem is exacerbated when CNAME flattening is enabled: the TLS configuration is selected based on the Server Name Indication (SNI) value, while routing uses the CNAME target, potentially bypassing the expected TLS configuration entirely. This mismatch can lead to the use of incorrect or less secure TLS certificates, undermining the confidentiality and integrity of communications. The vulnerability was patched in Traefik version 2.6.1. While a partial workaround exists by explicitly adding the FQDN to the host rule, no workaround is available if CNAME flattening is enabled, leaving systems vulnerable until patched. No known exploits have been reported in the wild to date.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a risk to secure communications managed via Traefik reverse proxies, particularly in environments where TLS configurations are critical for compliance and data protection (e.g., finance, healthcare, government). The improper TLS validation could allow attackers to intercept or manipulate traffic by exploiting the fallback to default or incorrect TLS configurations, potentially enabling man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks. This could lead to unauthorized data disclosure, session hijacking, or injection of malicious content. Organizations relying on CNAME flattening in DNS configurations are at higher risk, as no workaround exists in this scenario. The impact is significant for multi-tenant or microservices architectures where precise TLS routing is essential. Given Traefik’s popularity in cloud-native and containerized environments, the vulnerability could affect a broad range of services, disrupting availability and trust in secure communications.

Mitigation Recommendations

The primary mitigation is to upgrade Traefik to version 2.6.1 or later, where the vulnerability is patched. Organizations should audit their Traefik configurations to identify usage of FQDNs in host headers and verify if CNAME flattening is enabled. If upgrading immediately is not feasible, explicitly adding the FQDN to the host rule can serve as a temporary workaround, but only if CNAME flattening is disabled. It is critical to review DNS configurations to avoid reliance on CNAME flattening where possible. Additionally, organizations should implement strict monitoring and logging of TLS handshake failures or anomalies in Traefik logs to detect potential exploitation attempts. Network-level protections such as TLS inspection and anomaly detection can help identify suspicious traffic patterns. Finally, conducting penetration testing focused on TLS routing and certificate validation can help validate the effectiveness of mitigations.

Need more detailed analysis?Upgrade to Pro Console

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
GitHub_M
Date Reserved
2022-01-19T00:00:00.000Z
Cisa Enriched
true

Threat ID: 682d9842c4522896dcbf259e

Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:22 AM

Last enriched: 6/23/2025, 4:17:53 PM

Last updated: 2/7/2026, 12:57:28 PM

Views: 29

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats