CVE-2022-38401: Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122) in Adobe InCopy
Adobe InCopy version 17.3 (and earlier) and 16.4.2 (and earlier) are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2022-38401 is a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability identified in Adobe InCopy versions 17.3 and earlier, as well as 16.4.2 and earlier. Adobe InCopy is a professional word processing software commonly used in editorial workflows, often alongside Adobe InDesign. The vulnerability arises from improper handling of heap memory during the processing of certain file inputs, which can lead to a buffer overflow condition. This overflow can corrupt adjacent memory, potentially allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code within the context of the current user. Exploitation requires the victim to open a specially crafted malicious file, which triggers the overflow. Since the attack vector depends on user interaction (opening a malicious file), social engineering or phishing campaigns could be used to deliver the payload. There are no known exploits in the wild at the time of this analysis, and no official patches or updates have been linked in the provided information. The vulnerability is categorized under CWE-122, indicating a classic heap-based buffer overflow scenario. The impact of successful exploitation includes arbitrary code execution, which could lead to data compromise, privilege escalation if combined with other vulnerabilities, or disruption of normal application behavior. However, the attack is limited to the privileges of the user running Adobe InCopy, and does not inherently allow for system-wide compromise without further exploitation steps.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2022-38401 depends largely on the prevalence of Adobe InCopy in their operational environments. Organizations in publishing, media, marketing, and content creation sectors are most at risk, as these industries commonly use Adobe InCopy for editorial workflows. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized code execution, potentially resulting in data theft, insertion of malicious content into documents, or lateral movement within the network if combined with other vulnerabilities. Since the vulnerability requires user interaction, phishing or spear-phishing campaigns targeting editorial staff could be a likely attack vector. The confidentiality and integrity of sensitive editorial content could be compromised, and availability might be affected if the exploit causes application crashes or system instability. Although no known exploits are currently active, the medium severity rating suggests that attackers could develop reliable exploit code, especially given the widespread use of Adobe products. European organizations with stringent data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR) could face compliance risks if sensitive data is exposed due to exploitation. Additionally, organizations with remote or hybrid work models might face increased risk due to potentially less controlled environments where malicious files could be opened.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate mitigation should focus on user awareness and training to recognize and avoid opening suspicious or unsolicited files, especially those purporting to be Adobe InCopy documents. 2. Implement strict email filtering and attachment scanning to reduce the likelihood of malicious files reaching end users. 3. Employ application whitelisting and sandboxing techniques to limit the execution context of Adobe InCopy and isolate it from critical system components. 4. Monitor and restrict macro or script execution within Adobe InCopy if applicable. 5. Maintain up-to-date backups of critical editorial content to enable recovery in case of compromise. 6. Network segmentation can limit lateral movement if a compromise occurs. 7. Continuously monitor security advisories from Adobe for patches or updates addressing this vulnerability and apply them promptly once available. 8. Use endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools to identify anomalous behavior related to Adobe InCopy processes. 9. Consider deploying file integrity monitoring on directories where Adobe InCopy files are stored or edited to detect unauthorized changes. 10. For organizations with high-value editorial content, consider restricting Adobe InCopy usage to dedicated, hardened workstations with limited internet access.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Belgium, Switzerland, Ireland
CVE-2022-38401: Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122) in Adobe InCopy
Description
Adobe InCopy version 17.3 (and earlier) and 16.4.2 (and earlier) are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2022-38401 is a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability identified in Adobe InCopy versions 17.3 and earlier, as well as 16.4.2 and earlier. Adobe InCopy is a professional word processing software commonly used in editorial workflows, often alongside Adobe InDesign. The vulnerability arises from improper handling of heap memory during the processing of certain file inputs, which can lead to a buffer overflow condition. This overflow can corrupt adjacent memory, potentially allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code within the context of the current user. Exploitation requires the victim to open a specially crafted malicious file, which triggers the overflow. Since the attack vector depends on user interaction (opening a malicious file), social engineering or phishing campaigns could be used to deliver the payload. There are no known exploits in the wild at the time of this analysis, and no official patches or updates have been linked in the provided information. The vulnerability is categorized under CWE-122, indicating a classic heap-based buffer overflow scenario. The impact of successful exploitation includes arbitrary code execution, which could lead to data compromise, privilege escalation if combined with other vulnerabilities, or disruption of normal application behavior. However, the attack is limited to the privileges of the user running Adobe InCopy, and does not inherently allow for system-wide compromise without further exploitation steps.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2022-38401 depends largely on the prevalence of Adobe InCopy in their operational environments. Organizations in publishing, media, marketing, and content creation sectors are most at risk, as these industries commonly use Adobe InCopy for editorial workflows. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized code execution, potentially resulting in data theft, insertion of malicious content into documents, or lateral movement within the network if combined with other vulnerabilities. Since the vulnerability requires user interaction, phishing or spear-phishing campaigns targeting editorial staff could be a likely attack vector. The confidentiality and integrity of sensitive editorial content could be compromised, and availability might be affected if the exploit causes application crashes or system instability. Although no known exploits are currently active, the medium severity rating suggests that attackers could develop reliable exploit code, especially given the widespread use of Adobe products. European organizations with stringent data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR) could face compliance risks if sensitive data is exposed due to exploitation. Additionally, organizations with remote or hybrid work models might face increased risk due to potentially less controlled environments where malicious files could be opened.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate mitigation should focus on user awareness and training to recognize and avoid opening suspicious or unsolicited files, especially those purporting to be Adobe InCopy documents. 2. Implement strict email filtering and attachment scanning to reduce the likelihood of malicious files reaching end users. 3. Employ application whitelisting and sandboxing techniques to limit the execution context of Adobe InCopy and isolate it from critical system components. 4. Monitor and restrict macro or script execution within Adobe InCopy if applicable. 5. Maintain up-to-date backups of critical editorial content to enable recovery in case of compromise. 6. Network segmentation can limit lateral movement if a compromise occurs. 7. Continuously monitor security advisories from Adobe for patches or updates addressing this vulnerability and apply them promptly once available. 8. Use endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools to identify anomalous behavior related to Adobe InCopy processes. 9. Consider deploying file integrity monitoring on directories where Adobe InCopy files are stored or edited to detect unauthorized changes. 10. For organizations with high-value editorial content, consider restricting Adobe InCopy usage to dedicated, hardened workstations with limited internet access.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- adobe
- Date Reserved
- 2022-08-18T00:00:00.000Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
Threat ID: 682d9845c4522896dcbf4125
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:25 AM
Last enriched: 6/22/2025, 7:35:49 PM
Last updated: 8/18/2025, 11:22:56 PM
Views: 22
Related Threats
CVE-2025-9146: Risky Cryptographic Algorithm in Linksys E5600
HighCVE-2025-51540: n/a
UnknownCVE-2025-50938: n/a
UnknownCVE-2025-50434: n/a
UnknownHow We Exploited CodeRabbit: From a Simple PR to RCE and Write Access on 1M Repositories
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.