CVE-2022-39241: CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in discourse discourse
Discourse is a platform for community discussion. A malicious admin could use this vulnerability to perform port enumeration on the local host or other hosts on the internal network, as well as against hosts on the Internet. Latest `stable`, `beta`, and `test-passed` versions are now patched. As a workaround, self-hosters can use `DISCOURSE_BLOCKED_IP_BLOCKS` env var (which overrides `blocked_ip_blocks` setting) to stop webhooks from accessing private IPs.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2022-39241 is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability identified in Discourse, a widely used open-source platform for community discussions. The vulnerability affects Discourse versions up to 2.8.9 and 2.9.0.beta10. SSRF vulnerabilities allow an attacker to induce the server-side application to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, including internal network resources that are otherwise inaccessible externally. In this case, a malicious administrator with access to Discourse could exploit this SSRF flaw to perform port enumeration on the local host, internal network hosts, or even external internet hosts. This could reveal sensitive information about network topology, running services, and potentially expose other vulnerabilities. The vulnerability arises because the application does not sufficiently restrict or validate URLs used in webhook requests, allowing crafted requests to target internal IP ranges. Although no public exploits have been reported in the wild, the risk remains significant due to the privileged access required and the potential for lateral movement or reconnaissance within internal networks. The Discourse team has addressed this vulnerability in the latest stable, beta, and test-passed versions. For self-hosted instances where immediate patching is not feasible, a workaround involves configuring the environment variable DISCOURSE_BLOCKED_IP_BLOCKS, which overrides the blocked_ip_blocks setting to prevent webhooks from accessing private IP ranges, thereby mitigating SSRF exploitation vectors. This vulnerability is categorized under CWE-918, emphasizing the server-side request forgery nature of the issue.
Potential Impact
The impact of CVE-2022-39241 on European organizations primarily involves the risk of internal network reconnaissance and potential lateral movement within corporate or governmental networks that host Discourse instances. Since Discourse is often used by communities, enterprises, and public sector entities for collaboration and discussion, exploitation could lead to exposure of sensitive internal services, network configurations, and potentially facilitate further attacks such as privilege escalation or data exfiltration. The SSRF vulnerability could undermine confidentiality by revealing internal IP addresses and services, integrity if combined with other exploits to manipulate internal systems, and availability if used to perform denial-of-service attacks on internal resources. Given that exploitation requires administrative privileges on the Discourse platform, the threat is more relevant in environments where admin accounts may be compromised or malicious insiders exist. European organizations with self-hosted Discourse platforms that have not applied patches or mitigations are at risk, especially those in sectors with sensitive data or critical infrastructure. The lack of known exploits in the wild reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the potential for targeted attacks, particularly in high-value environments.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate patching: Upgrade all Discourse instances to the latest stable or beta versions where the vulnerability is fixed. 2. For self-hosted environments unable to patch immediately, configure the DISCOURSE_BLOCKED_IP_BLOCKS environment variable to explicitly block private IP ranges and other sensitive network segments from webhook requests, effectively preventing SSRF attempts targeting internal resources. 3. Restrict administrative access: Enforce strict access controls and multi-factor authentication for Discourse admin accounts to reduce the risk of malicious insiders or compromised credentials. 4. Network segmentation: Isolate Discourse servers from critical internal networks where possible, limiting the scope of SSRF exploitation. 5. Monitor logs: Implement detailed logging and monitoring of webhook requests and network traffic originating from Discourse servers to detect anomalous or unauthorized internal requests. 6. Conduct regular security audits and penetration tests focusing on SSRF and related vulnerabilities in webhooks and internal request handling. 7. Educate administrators about the risks of SSRF and the importance of timely patching and configuration management.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Italy, Spain, Belgium, Poland, Finland
CVE-2022-39241: CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in discourse discourse
Description
Discourse is a platform for community discussion. A malicious admin could use this vulnerability to perform port enumeration on the local host or other hosts on the internal network, as well as against hosts on the Internet. Latest `stable`, `beta`, and `test-passed` versions are now patched. As a workaround, self-hosters can use `DISCOURSE_BLOCKED_IP_BLOCKS` env var (which overrides `blocked_ip_blocks` setting) to stop webhooks from accessing private IPs.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2022-39241 is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability identified in Discourse, a widely used open-source platform for community discussions. The vulnerability affects Discourse versions up to 2.8.9 and 2.9.0.beta10. SSRF vulnerabilities allow an attacker to induce the server-side application to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, including internal network resources that are otherwise inaccessible externally. In this case, a malicious administrator with access to Discourse could exploit this SSRF flaw to perform port enumeration on the local host, internal network hosts, or even external internet hosts. This could reveal sensitive information about network topology, running services, and potentially expose other vulnerabilities. The vulnerability arises because the application does not sufficiently restrict or validate URLs used in webhook requests, allowing crafted requests to target internal IP ranges. Although no public exploits have been reported in the wild, the risk remains significant due to the privileged access required and the potential for lateral movement or reconnaissance within internal networks. The Discourse team has addressed this vulnerability in the latest stable, beta, and test-passed versions. For self-hosted instances where immediate patching is not feasible, a workaround involves configuring the environment variable DISCOURSE_BLOCKED_IP_BLOCKS, which overrides the blocked_ip_blocks setting to prevent webhooks from accessing private IP ranges, thereby mitigating SSRF exploitation vectors. This vulnerability is categorized under CWE-918, emphasizing the server-side request forgery nature of the issue.
Potential Impact
The impact of CVE-2022-39241 on European organizations primarily involves the risk of internal network reconnaissance and potential lateral movement within corporate or governmental networks that host Discourse instances. Since Discourse is often used by communities, enterprises, and public sector entities for collaboration and discussion, exploitation could lead to exposure of sensitive internal services, network configurations, and potentially facilitate further attacks such as privilege escalation or data exfiltration. The SSRF vulnerability could undermine confidentiality by revealing internal IP addresses and services, integrity if combined with other exploits to manipulate internal systems, and availability if used to perform denial-of-service attacks on internal resources. Given that exploitation requires administrative privileges on the Discourse platform, the threat is more relevant in environments where admin accounts may be compromised or malicious insiders exist. European organizations with self-hosted Discourse platforms that have not applied patches or mitigations are at risk, especially those in sectors with sensitive data or critical infrastructure. The lack of known exploits in the wild reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the potential for targeted attacks, particularly in high-value environments.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate patching: Upgrade all Discourse instances to the latest stable or beta versions where the vulnerability is fixed. 2. For self-hosted environments unable to patch immediately, configure the DISCOURSE_BLOCKED_IP_BLOCKS environment variable to explicitly block private IP ranges and other sensitive network segments from webhook requests, effectively preventing SSRF attempts targeting internal resources. 3. Restrict administrative access: Enforce strict access controls and multi-factor authentication for Discourse admin accounts to reduce the risk of malicious insiders or compromised credentials. 4. Network segmentation: Isolate Discourse servers from critical internal networks where possible, limiting the scope of SSRF exploitation. 5. Monitor logs: Implement detailed logging and monitoring of webhook requests and network traffic originating from Discourse servers to detect anomalous or unauthorized internal requests. 6. Conduct regular security audits and penetration tests focusing on SSRF and related vulnerabilities in webhooks and internal request handling. 7. Educate administrators about the risks of SSRF and the importance of timely patching and configuration management.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- GitHub_M
- Date Reserved
- 2022-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
Threat ID: 682d9845c4522896dcbf4819
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:25 AM
Last enriched: 6/22/2025, 3:20:59 PM
Last updated: 8/15/2025, 5:04:47 AM
Views: 16
Related Threats
CVE-2025-9091: Hard-coded Credentials in Tenda AC20
LowCVE-2025-9090: Command Injection in Tenda AC20
MediumCVE-2025-9092: CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. Bouncy Castle for Java - BC-FJA 2.1.0
LowCVE-2025-9089: Stack-based Buffer Overflow in Tenda AC20
HighCVE-2025-9088: Stack-based Buffer Overflow in Tenda AC20
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.