VulnerabilityPublished 31 Jul 2023Updated 30 May 2025

CVE-2023-35792: XSS

Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.4 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 13:47 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.4Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 26% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AC:L/AV:N/A:N/C:L/I:L/PR:L/S:C/UI:R

Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Vector: Network
Availability: None
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
Scope: Changed
User Interaction: Required

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 31 Jul 2023
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
n/a n/a	Affected =2.6.0.3	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Organizations should prioritize the following actions: 1) Apply any available patches or updates from Vound as soon as they are released. 2) Conduct a thorough review of input validation and output encoding practices within the application, focusing on user-supplied data fields that are stored and rendered. 3) Restrict user privileges to the minimum necessary to reduce the risk of malicious input injection. 4) Educate users about the risks of interacting with suspicious links or content within the platform to mitigate social engineering vectors. 5) Monitor logs and user activity for unusual behavior that could indicate exploitation attempts. 6) Consider deploying Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to limit the execution of unauthorized scripts in the application context. 7) Engage with the vendor for detailed guidance and timelines for remediation.

Description

Vound Intella Connect 2.6.0.3 is vulnerable to stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS).

Impact

For European organizations using Vound Intella Connect 2.6.0.3, this vulnerability poses a moderate risk. Stored XSS can lead to session hijacking, unauthorized actions, and data leakage, potentially compromising sensitive information handled by the platform. Since Intella Connect is a tool often used for eDiscovery and data analysis, exposure could lead to leakage of confidential legal or corporate data. The requirement for user interaction means phishing or social engineering could be used to trigger the exploit. The scope change indicates that the vulnerability could allow attackers to affect other users or components beyond the initially compromised module, increasing the risk of lateral movement or broader impact within the organization. Although no active exploitation is known, the presence of this vulnerability in environments handling sensitive or regulated data (such as GDPR-protected information) could lead to compliance violations and reputational damage if exploited.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 8 Jul 2025, 15:59 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats