Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished

CVE-2024-51347: A Buffer Overflow

Source CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.2 High.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score
7.2High
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 26% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 25 Mar 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

What to do

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2024-51347, organizations should first check with the vendor for any available firmware updates that address this vulnerability and apply them promptly. Disabling the ONVIF interface if not required can reduce the attack surface. Monitoring network traffic for unusual or malformed ONVIF requests may help detect exploitation attempts. Employing intrusion detection or prevention systems with signatures targeting buffer overflow attempts on ONVIF protocols can provide additional defense. Vendors and integrators should review and update their software development practices to replace unsafe string functions like strcpy with safer alternatives that perform bounds checking, such as strncpy or strlcpy. Regular security assessments and penetration testing of IP camera deployments are recommended to identify and remediate similar vulnerabilities proactively.

Description

A buffer overflow vulnerability in the dgiot binary in LSC Smart Indoor IP Camera V7.6.32. The flaw exists in the handling of the Time Zone (TZ) parameter within the ONVIF configuration interface. The time zone (TZ) parameter does not have its length properly validated before being copied into a fixed-size buffer using the insecure strcpy function.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…