CVE-2024-52922VulnerabilityPublished 18 Nov 2024

CVE-2024-52922: n/a

Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.5 Medium · fixed in 25.1 : update Bitcoin Core when convenient.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 07:57 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

6.5Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 25% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Affects: Bitcoin Core before 25.1
Patch: Available – fixed in 25.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 18 Nov 2024
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2024-52922, organizations should upgrade all Bitcoin Core nodes to version 25.1 or later where the protocol compliance issue is resolved. Network operators should monitor peer behavior for anomalies such as stalling or delayed block announcements and consider implementing peer blacklisting or rate limiting for suspicious nodes. Enhancing logging and alerting on block propagation delays can help detect exploitation attempts early. Additionally, running multiple redundant nodes and using diverse peer connections can reduce the impact of any single stalling peer. Operators should also keep abreast of Bitcoin Core release notes and security advisories to apply patches promptly. Finally, educating infrastructure teams about this vulnerability and its operational impact will improve incident response readiness.

Description

In Bitcoin Core before 25.1, an attacker can cause a node to not download the latest block, because there can be minutes of delay when an announcing peer stalls instead of complying with the peer-to-peer protocol specification.

Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2024-52922 is a delay in blockchain synchronization for affected Bitcoin Core nodes. This delay can cause nodes to temporarily operate on outdated blockchain data, potentially slowing transaction confirmations and consensus propagation. For organizations running Bitcoin infrastructure, such delays could reduce the efficiency and reliability of their services, including wallets, exchanges, and payment processors. While the vulnerability does not allow direct compromise of data integrity or availability, prolonged delays could be exploited in coordinated attacks to degrade network performance or cause temporary forks. The impact is mostly operational and timing-related rather than catastrophic. Since Bitcoin is a globally distributed network, even minor delays can have ripple effects on transaction finality and network trustworthiness if exploited at scale.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…