Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2024-56522: tecnick tcpdf · Type Confusion

Affects tecnick tcpdfSource CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.5 High.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 17:16 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score
7.5High
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
0.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 49% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 27 Dec 2024

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

What to do

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
tecnick tcpdfAffected
  • =0
Fixed in–

AI-suggested

  1. Upgrade TCPDF to version 6.8.0 or later, where the vulnerability has been addressed with proper use of strict and constant-time comparisons.
  2. Audit all applications using TCPDF to identify usage of unserializeTCPDFtag or similar unserialize functions and replace or harden them to avoid unsafe deserialization and timing leaks.
  3. Implement application-layer input validation and sanitization to reduce the risk of malicious payloads triggering the vulnerability.
  4. Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules to detect and block suspicious requests targeting PDF generation endpoints.
  5. Monitor application logs and network traffic for anomalous timing patterns or repeated requests that may indicate exploitation attempts.
  6. Educate developers on secure coding practices related to serialization, deserialization, and cryptographic comparisons to prevent similar vulnerabilities.
  7. Consider deploying runtime application self-protection (RASP) tools to detect and mitigate exploitation attempts in real time.

Description

An issue was discovered in TCPDF before 6.8.0.unserializeTCPDFtag uses != (aka loose comparison) and does not use a constant-time function to compare TCPDF tag hashes.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…