CVE-2025-11071VulnerabilityPublished 27 Sep 2025Updated 29 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-11071: SeaCMS · SQL Injection

Affects SeaCMSSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.1 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 27% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: High
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: High: The attacker requires privileges that provide significant (e.g., administrative) control over the vulnerable system allowing full access to the vulnerable system’s settings and files.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 27 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
SeaCMS	Affected =13.3.20250820	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Immediate mitigation should focus on restricting access to the /admin_cron.php endpoint, limiting it to trusted internal networks or VPNs to reduce exposure. 2. Implement strict input validation and sanitization on the 'resourcefrom' and 'collectID' parameters to prevent injection of malicious SQL code. 3. Apply the principle of least privilege by ensuring that only necessary users have high-level privileges required to exploit this vulnerability. 4. Monitor logs for unusual SQL queries or access patterns related to the Cron Task Management Module to detect potential exploitation attempts. 5. If possible, upgrade SeaCMS to a patched version once available or apply vendor-recommended workarounds. 6. Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with rules targeting SQL injection patterns specific to SeaCMS to provide an additional layer of defense. 7. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing focusing on administrative modules and input handling to identify similar vulnerabilities proactively.

Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in SeaCMS 13.3.20250820. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /admin_cron.php of the component Cron Task Management Module. The manipulation of the argument resourcefrom/collectID leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Impact

For European organizations using SeaCMS 13.3.20250820, this vulnerability poses a moderate risk. If exploited, attackers with high-level privileges could manipulate backend databases, potentially leading to unauthorized data access, data corruption, or disruption of scheduled tasks managed by the Cron Task Management Module. This could affect the integrity and availability of web services, potentially causing operational disruptions. Given the medium severity and the requirement for elevated privileges, the threat is more significant for organizations with weak internal access controls or exposed administrative interfaces. Industries such as media, publishing, and any sector relying on SeaCMS for content management could face reputational damage and compliance issues, especially under GDPR regulations if personal data is compromised. The remote exploitability without user interaction increases the attack surface, particularly if administrative endpoints are accessible from the internet or poorly segmented networks.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 5 Oct 2025, 00:50 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats