Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-23964: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in ajitae Google Plus

0
Unknown
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-23964cvecve-2025-23964
Published: Wed Mar 26 2025 (03/26/2025, 14:24:17 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: ajitae
Product: Google Plus

Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in ajitae Google Plus google-plus-google allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Google Plus: from n/a through <= 1.0.2.

AI-Powered Analysis

Machine-generated threat intelligence

AILast updated: 04/01/2026, 20:50:53 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-23964 identifies a Reflected Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the ajitae Google Plus platform, specifically affecting versions up to and including 1.0.2. The vulnerability stems from improper neutralization of user-supplied input during the generation of web pages, which allows attackers to inject malicious JavaScript code that is reflected back to the victim's browser. When a user interacts with a crafted URL or input, the malicious script executes in the context of the victim's session, potentially enabling attackers to steal session cookies, perform actions on behalf of the user, or redirect users to malicious sites. This type of vulnerability is common in web applications that fail to properly sanitize or encode inputs before rendering them in HTML responses. The vulnerability does not require prior authentication, increasing its risk profile, but does require user interaction, such as clicking a malicious link. No CVSS score has been assigned yet, and no patches or official remediation guidance have been published. The vulnerability was reserved in January 2025 and published in March 2025, with no known exploits in the wild to date. Given the nature of reflected XSS, attackers typically leverage social engineering to entice users to visit malicious URLs. The ajitae Google Plus product, while not as widely used as other social platforms, still represents a significant attack surface for targeted phishing or broader exploitation campaigns.

Potential Impact

The primary impact of this vulnerability is on the confidentiality and integrity of user data and sessions. Successful exploitation can lead to session hijacking, allowing attackers to impersonate legitimate users and access sensitive information or perform unauthorized actions. It can also facilitate the spread of malware or phishing attacks by redirecting users to malicious websites. For organizations, this can result in data breaches, reputational damage, and potential regulatory penalties if user data is compromised. The availability impact is generally low for reflected XSS, as it does not directly disrupt service but can indirectly affect user trust and platform usage. Since the vulnerability does not require authentication, it can be exploited by unauthenticated attackers, increasing the attack surface. The scope includes all users interacting with vulnerable versions of the ajitae Google Plus platform, potentially affecting millions depending on user base size. The lack of known exploits in the wild suggests limited current active exploitation but does not preclude future attacks, especially as proof-of-concept code may emerge.

Mitigation Recommendations

To mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should implement strict input validation and output encoding on all user-supplied data before rendering it in web pages. Employing context-aware encoding (e.g., HTML entity encoding) prevents malicious scripts from executing. Web application firewalls (WAFs) can provide temporary protection by detecting and blocking suspicious input patterns. Developers should adopt secure coding practices, including the use of security libraries or frameworks that automatically handle input sanitization. Since no official patches are available, organizations should monitor vendor communications for updates and apply patches promptly once released. Additionally, educating users about the risks of clicking unknown or suspicious links can reduce the likelihood of successful exploitation. Conducting regular security assessments and penetration testing can help identify and remediate similar vulnerabilities proactively. Finally, implementing Content Security Policy (CSP) headers can limit the impact of XSS by restricting the execution of unauthorized scripts.

Pro Console: star threats, build custom feeds, automate alerts via Slack, email & webhooks.Upgrade to Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
Patchstack
Date Reserved
2025-01-16T11:33:05.291Z
Cvss Version
null
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 69cd7252e6bfc5ba1dee90f9

Added to database: 4/1/2026, 7:30:26 PM

Last enriched: 4/1/2026, 8:50:53 PM

Last updated: 4/4/2026, 8:15:37 AM

Views: 5

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats

Breach by OffSeqOFFSEQFRIENDS — 25% OFF

Check if your credentials are on the dark web

Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.

Scan now
OffSeq TrainingCredly Certified

Lead Pen Test Professional

Technical5-day eLearningPECB Accredited
View courses