CVE-2025-26903: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in RealMag777 InPost Gallery
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in RealMag777 InPost Gallery inpost-gallery allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects InPost Gallery: from n/a through <= 2.1.4.3.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-26903 identifies a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the RealMag777 InPost Gallery product, affecting all versions up to and including 2.1.4.3. CSRF vulnerabilities occur when a web application does not properly verify that requests made to it originate from authenticated and authorized users, allowing attackers to craft malicious requests that execute actions on behalf of logged-in users without their knowledge. InPost Gallery is a web-based gallery management system, and this vulnerability could allow attackers to perform unauthorized operations such as modifying gallery content, changing user settings, or other state-changing actions. The vulnerability does not require the attacker to steal credentials or bypass authentication; instead, it relies on the victim being logged into the application and visiting a malicious web page or clicking a crafted link. The lack of a CVSS score indicates that the vulnerability is newly published and has not yet been fully assessed or exploited in the wild. However, CSRF vulnerabilities are well-understood and can be mitigated by implementing anti-CSRF tokens, checking the HTTP Referer header, or using same-site cookies. The absence of patch links suggests that a fix may not yet be publicly available, emphasizing the need for immediate mitigation strategies. The vulnerability affects a niche but potentially widely deployed gallery product, which could be integrated into various content management workflows, increasing the attack surface.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of this CSRF vulnerability is unauthorized actions performed on behalf of authenticated users, potentially leading to unauthorized modification or deletion of gallery content, changes to user preferences, or other administrative functions depending on user privileges. This can compromise data integrity and availability within the affected galleries. For organizations relying on InPost Gallery for digital asset management or public-facing content, exploitation could result in reputational damage, loss of user trust, and operational disruption. While confidentiality impact is limited since CSRF typically does not expose data directly, indirect data exposure could occur if attackers manipulate gallery settings or user accounts. The ease of exploitation is moderate since it requires the victim to be authenticated and visit a malicious site, but no complex technical skills or authentication bypass are needed. The scope is limited to organizations and users running vulnerable versions of InPost Gallery, but given the product’s web-based nature, the attack surface can be broad. No known exploits in the wild reduce immediate risk but do not eliminate future threat potential.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should implement multiple layers of defense to mitigate this CSRF vulnerability. First, apply any available patches or updates from RealMag777 as soon as they are released. In the absence of official patches, administrators should enforce strict anti-CSRF protections by integrating CSRF tokens into all state-changing requests and validating them server-side. Additionally, configuring the application to use SameSite=strict or lax cookies can help prevent cross-origin requests from being accepted. Web application firewalls (WAFs) can be tuned to detect and block suspicious cross-site requests. User education is important to reduce the risk of users clicking on malicious links or visiting untrusted websites while authenticated. Regular security audits and penetration testing should verify the presence and effectiveness of CSRF protections. Finally, monitoring application logs for unusual or unauthorized actions can help detect attempted exploitation early.
Affected Countries
United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, France, Netherlands, Japan, South Korea, Italy
CVE-2025-26903: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in RealMag777 InPost Gallery
Description
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in RealMag777 InPost Gallery inpost-gallery allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects InPost Gallery: from n/a through <= 2.1.4.3.
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-26903 identifies a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the RealMag777 InPost Gallery product, affecting all versions up to and including 2.1.4.3. CSRF vulnerabilities occur when a web application does not properly verify that requests made to it originate from authenticated and authorized users, allowing attackers to craft malicious requests that execute actions on behalf of logged-in users without their knowledge. InPost Gallery is a web-based gallery management system, and this vulnerability could allow attackers to perform unauthorized operations such as modifying gallery content, changing user settings, or other state-changing actions. The vulnerability does not require the attacker to steal credentials or bypass authentication; instead, it relies on the victim being logged into the application and visiting a malicious web page or clicking a crafted link. The lack of a CVSS score indicates that the vulnerability is newly published and has not yet been fully assessed or exploited in the wild. However, CSRF vulnerabilities are well-understood and can be mitigated by implementing anti-CSRF tokens, checking the HTTP Referer header, or using same-site cookies. The absence of patch links suggests that a fix may not yet be publicly available, emphasizing the need for immediate mitigation strategies. The vulnerability affects a niche but potentially widely deployed gallery product, which could be integrated into various content management workflows, increasing the attack surface.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of this CSRF vulnerability is unauthorized actions performed on behalf of authenticated users, potentially leading to unauthorized modification or deletion of gallery content, changes to user preferences, or other administrative functions depending on user privileges. This can compromise data integrity and availability within the affected galleries. For organizations relying on InPost Gallery for digital asset management or public-facing content, exploitation could result in reputational damage, loss of user trust, and operational disruption. While confidentiality impact is limited since CSRF typically does not expose data directly, indirect data exposure could occur if attackers manipulate gallery settings or user accounts. The ease of exploitation is moderate since it requires the victim to be authenticated and visit a malicious site, but no complex technical skills or authentication bypass are needed. The scope is limited to organizations and users running vulnerable versions of InPost Gallery, but given the product’s web-based nature, the attack surface can be broad. No known exploits in the wild reduce immediate risk but do not eliminate future threat potential.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should implement multiple layers of defense to mitigate this CSRF vulnerability. First, apply any available patches or updates from RealMag777 as soon as they are released. In the absence of official patches, administrators should enforce strict anti-CSRF protections by integrating CSRF tokens into all state-changing requests and validating them server-side. Additionally, configuring the application to use SameSite=strict or lax cookies can help prevent cross-origin requests from being accepted. Web application firewalls (WAFs) can be tuned to detect and block suspicious cross-site requests. User education is important to reduce the risk of users clicking on malicious links or visiting untrusted websites while authenticated. Regular security audits and penetration testing should verify the presence and effectiveness of CSRF protections. Finally, monitoring application logs for unusual or unauthorized actions can help detect attempted exploitation early.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- Patchstack
- Date Reserved
- 2025-02-17T11:50:42.823Z
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 69cd72b5e6bfc5ba1deecabf
Added to database: 4/1/2026, 7:32:05 PM
Last enriched: 4/1/2026, 10:39:37 PM
Last updated: 4/6/2026, 9:31:55 AM
Views: 4
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.