CVE-2025-31565: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in Lisandro Martinez WPSmartContracts
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Lisandro Martinez WPSmartContracts wp-smart-contracts allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects WPSmartContracts: from n/a through <= 2.0.12.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-31565 identifies a Blind SQL Injection vulnerability in the WPSmartContracts plugin for WordPress, developed by Lisandro Martinez. This vulnerability stems from improper neutralization of special characters in SQL commands, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary SQL code into database queries. Blind SQL Injection means that while attackers cannot see the direct output of their injected queries, they can infer data through timing or boolean-based techniques. The affected versions include all releases up to and including 2.0.12. The vulnerability could be exploited remotely without authentication, potentially enabling attackers to extract sensitive information such as user credentials, contract data, or other confidential information stored in the database. Additionally, attackers might manipulate or delete data, impacting data integrity and availability. No patches or fixes have been published yet, and no known exploits have been detected in the wild. The plugin’s role in managing smart contracts within WordPress sites makes this vulnerability particularly concerning for organizations leveraging blockchain or contract automation technologies. The absence of a CVSS score necessitates an expert severity assessment based on the nature of the vulnerability and its potential impact.
Potential Impact
The impact of this vulnerability is significant for organizations using the WPSmartContracts plugin. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized disclosure of sensitive contract and user data, undermining confidentiality. Data integrity could be compromised through unauthorized modifications or deletions of contract records or other database entries. Availability could also be affected if attackers disrupt database operations or cause application errors. Given that WordPress powers a large portion of websites globally, including many e-commerce and blockchain-related sites, the scope of affected systems could be broad. Organizations relying on WPSmartContracts for smart contract management face risks of financial loss, reputational damage, and regulatory non-compliance if sensitive data is exposed or manipulated. The lack of authentication requirement lowers the barrier to exploitation, increasing the threat level. Although no exploits are currently known in the wild, the vulnerability’s presence in a widely used plugin makes it a likely target for attackers once a reliable exploit is developed.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediately audit all WordPress sites using WPSmartContracts and identify affected versions (<= 2.0.12). 2. Restrict access to the plugin’s functionalities by limiting user roles and permissions to trusted administrators only. 3. Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block SQL injection attempts targeting the plugin’s endpoints. 4. Monitor database logs and application logs for unusual queries or error patterns indicative of SQL injection attempts. 5. Disable or remove the WPSmartContracts plugin temporarily if it is not critical to operations until a security patch is released. 6. Follow the vendor’s updates closely and apply patches immediately once available. 7. Implement database user accounts with least privilege, ensuring the WordPress database user has only necessary permissions to limit damage from injection attacks. 8. Conduct security testing, including penetration testing focused on SQL injection vectors, to verify the effectiveness of mitigations. 9. Educate site administrators about the risks and signs of SQL injection attacks to improve early detection.
Affected Countries
United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, India, Brazil, France, Netherlands, Japan, South Korea, Italy
CVE-2025-31565: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in Lisandro Martinez WPSmartContracts
Description
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Lisandro Martinez WPSmartContracts wp-smart-contracts allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects WPSmartContracts: from n/a through <= 2.0.12.
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-31565 identifies a Blind SQL Injection vulnerability in the WPSmartContracts plugin for WordPress, developed by Lisandro Martinez. This vulnerability stems from improper neutralization of special characters in SQL commands, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary SQL code into database queries. Blind SQL Injection means that while attackers cannot see the direct output of their injected queries, they can infer data through timing or boolean-based techniques. The affected versions include all releases up to and including 2.0.12. The vulnerability could be exploited remotely without authentication, potentially enabling attackers to extract sensitive information such as user credentials, contract data, or other confidential information stored in the database. Additionally, attackers might manipulate or delete data, impacting data integrity and availability. No patches or fixes have been published yet, and no known exploits have been detected in the wild. The plugin’s role in managing smart contracts within WordPress sites makes this vulnerability particularly concerning for organizations leveraging blockchain or contract automation technologies. The absence of a CVSS score necessitates an expert severity assessment based on the nature of the vulnerability and its potential impact.
Potential Impact
The impact of this vulnerability is significant for organizations using the WPSmartContracts plugin. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized disclosure of sensitive contract and user data, undermining confidentiality. Data integrity could be compromised through unauthorized modifications or deletions of contract records or other database entries. Availability could also be affected if attackers disrupt database operations or cause application errors. Given that WordPress powers a large portion of websites globally, including many e-commerce and blockchain-related sites, the scope of affected systems could be broad. Organizations relying on WPSmartContracts for smart contract management face risks of financial loss, reputational damage, and regulatory non-compliance if sensitive data is exposed or manipulated. The lack of authentication requirement lowers the barrier to exploitation, increasing the threat level. Although no exploits are currently known in the wild, the vulnerability’s presence in a widely used plugin makes it a likely target for attackers once a reliable exploit is developed.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediately audit all WordPress sites using WPSmartContracts and identify affected versions (<= 2.0.12). 2. Restrict access to the plugin’s functionalities by limiting user roles and permissions to trusted administrators only. 3. Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block SQL injection attempts targeting the plugin’s endpoints. 4. Monitor database logs and application logs for unusual queries or error patterns indicative of SQL injection attempts. 5. Disable or remove the WPSmartContracts plugin temporarily if it is not critical to operations until a security patch is released. 6. Follow the vendor’s updates closely and apply patches immediately once available. 7. Implement database user accounts with least privilege, ensuring the WordPress database user has only necessary permissions to limit damage from injection attacks. 8. Conduct security testing, including penetration testing focused on SQL injection vectors, to verify the effectiveness of mitigations. 9. Educate site administrators about the risks and signs of SQL injection attacks to improve early detection.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- Patchstack
- Date Reserved
- 2025-03-31T10:05:43.538Z
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 69cd7367e6bfc5ba1def1fe3
Added to database: 4/1/2026, 7:35:03 PM
Last enriched: 4/2/2026, 1:33:47 AM
Last updated: 4/4/2026, 8:22:37 AM
Views: 6
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.