CVE-2025-32278: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in wprio Table Block by RioVizual
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wprio Table Block by RioVizual riovizual allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Table Block by RioVizual: from n/a through <= 2.3.1.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-32278 identifies a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Table Block plugin by RioVizual (wprio), affecting versions up to and including 2.3.1. CSRF vulnerabilities occur when an attacker tricks an authenticated user into submitting a forged request to a web application, causing the application to perform unintended actions on behalf of the user. In this case, the Table Block plugin does not adequately verify the authenticity of requests, allowing attackers to craft malicious web pages or links that, when visited or clicked by an authenticated user, can execute unauthorized commands or changes within the plugin's context. The vulnerability impacts the integrity of the application by enabling unauthorized modifications and could also affect availability if destructive actions are possible. Exploitation requires the victim to be logged in and interact with attacker-controlled content, such as visiting a malicious website. No CVSS score is assigned yet, and no public exploits have been reported. The vulnerability is published and tracked under CVE-2025-32278, with Patchstack as the assigner. The affected product is primarily used within WordPress environments, which are widely deployed globally. The absence of patches at the time of publication indicates that users should apply mitigations proactively. The vulnerability highlights the importance of implementing anti-CSRF protections such as nonce tokens and origin checks in web applications and plugins.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of this CSRF vulnerability is unauthorized actions performed with the privileges of authenticated users, potentially leading to data integrity issues such as unauthorized content changes or configuration modifications within the Table Block plugin. If the plugin controls critical content or functionality on a website, attackers could manipulate displayed data or disrupt normal operations, affecting availability. The confidentiality impact is generally limited unless the unauthorized actions expose sensitive data indirectly. Since exploitation requires user authentication and interaction, the attack surface is somewhat constrained but still significant for sites with many authenticated users or administrators. Organizations relying on the Table Block plugin for content management or presentation may face reputational damage, operational disruption, and increased risk of further exploitation if attackers leverage this vulnerability as a foothold. The lack of known exploits reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the threat, especially as attackers may develop exploits once patches are released or if mitigations are not applied.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediately implement anti-CSRF protections if not already present, including the use of unique nonce tokens for state-changing requests within the Table Block plugin. 2. Validate the HTTP Referer or Origin headers on incoming requests to ensure they originate from trusted sources. 3. Limit the privileges of users who can perform sensitive actions in the plugin to reduce potential damage from CSRF attacks. 4. Monitor web server logs for unusual or suspicious requests that could indicate attempted exploitation. 5. Educate users and administrators about the risks of clicking unknown links or visiting untrusted websites while authenticated. 6. Regularly update the Table Block plugin to the latest version once a patch addressing this vulnerability is released by RioVizual. 7. Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules designed to detect and block CSRF attack patterns. 8. Conduct security audits and penetration testing focused on CSRF and other web vulnerabilities in the affected environment. 9. Consider implementing Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to reduce the risk of malicious script execution that could facilitate CSRF.
Affected Countries
United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, France, Netherlands, India, Brazil, Japan, Italy, Spain
CVE-2025-32278: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in wprio Table Block by RioVizual
Description
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wprio Table Block by RioVizual riovizual allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Table Block by RioVizual: from n/a through <= 2.3.1.
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-32278 identifies a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Table Block plugin by RioVizual (wprio), affecting versions up to and including 2.3.1. CSRF vulnerabilities occur when an attacker tricks an authenticated user into submitting a forged request to a web application, causing the application to perform unintended actions on behalf of the user. In this case, the Table Block plugin does not adequately verify the authenticity of requests, allowing attackers to craft malicious web pages or links that, when visited or clicked by an authenticated user, can execute unauthorized commands or changes within the plugin's context. The vulnerability impacts the integrity of the application by enabling unauthorized modifications and could also affect availability if destructive actions are possible. Exploitation requires the victim to be logged in and interact with attacker-controlled content, such as visiting a malicious website. No CVSS score is assigned yet, and no public exploits have been reported. The vulnerability is published and tracked under CVE-2025-32278, with Patchstack as the assigner. The affected product is primarily used within WordPress environments, which are widely deployed globally. The absence of patches at the time of publication indicates that users should apply mitigations proactively. The vulnerability highlights the importance of implementing anti-CSRF protections such as nonce tokens and origin checks in web applications and plugins.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of this CSRF vulnerability is unauthorized actions performed with the privileges of authenticated users, potentially leading to data integrity issues such as unauthorized content changes or configuration modifications within the Table Block plugin. If the plugin controls critical content or functionality on a website, attackers could manipulate displayed data or disrupt normal operations, affecting availability. The confidentiality impact is generally limited unless the unauthorized actions expose sensitive data indirectly. Since exploitation requires user authentication and interaction, the attack surface is somewhat constrained but still significant for sites with many authenticated users or administrators. Organizations relying on the Table Block plugin for content management or presentation may face reputational damage, operational disruption, and increased risk of further exploitation if attackers leverage this vulnerability as a foothold. The lack of known exploits reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the threat, especially as attackers may develop exploits once patches are released or if mitigations are not applied.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediately implement anti-CSRF protections if not already present, including the use of unique nonce tokens for state-changing requests within the Table Block plugin. 2. Validate the HTTP Referer or Origin headers on incoming requests to ensure they originate from trusted sources. 3. Limit the privileges of users who can perform sensitive actions in the plugin to reduce potential damage from CSRF attacks. 4. Monitor web server logs for unusual or suspicious requests that could indicate attempted exploitation. 5. Educate users and administrators about the risks of clicking unknown links or visiting untrusted websites while authenticated. 6. Regularly update the Table Block plugin to the latest version once a patch addressing this vulnerability is released by RioVizual. 7. Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules designed to detect and block CSRF attack patterns. 8. Conduct security audits and penetration testing focused on CSRF and other web vulnerabilities in the affected environment. 9. Consider implementing Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to reduce the risk of malicious script execution that could facilitate CSRF.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- Patchstack
- Date Reserved
- 2025-04-04T10:02:30.560Z
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 69cd73c0e6bfc5ba1def37d0
Added to database: 4/1/2026, 7:36:32 PM
Last enriched: 4/2/2026, 3:05:23 AM
Last updated: 4/6/2026, 9:37:16 AM
Views: 5
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.