CVE-2025-32556: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Sandor Kovacs Simple Post Meta Manager
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sandor Kovacs Simple Post Meta Manager simple-post-meta-manager allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Simple Post Meta Manager: from n/a through <= 1.0.9.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-32556 identifies a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Simple Post Meta Manager WordPress plugin by Sandor Kovacs, affecting all versions up to 1.0.9. CSRF vulnerabilities allow attackers to trick authenticated users into submitting unwanted requests to a web application, thereby performing actions without the user's consent. In this case, the vulnerability is compounded by the presence of reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), which can be leveraged to bypass same-origin policies and execute malicious scripts in the victim's browser. The plugin manages post metadata in WordPress, and unauthorized modification could lead to data integrity issues or privilege escalation. The vulnerability does not require prior authentication but does require user interaction, such as visiting a malicious link. No patches or exploit code are currently publicly available, but the vulnerability is officially published and tracked. The absence of a CVSS score necessitates an assessment based on the potential impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, ease of exploitation, and scope of affected systems. The plugin is widely used in WordPress environments, which are prevalent globally, especially in countries with large WordPress user bases. The vulnerability's exploitation could allow attackers to manipulate post metadata, inject malicious content, or disrupt site functionality, impacting site owners and visitors alike.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of this vulnerability is on the integrity and confidentiality of WordPress sites using the Simple Post Meta Manager plugin. Attackers exploiting the CSRF vulnerability can perform unauthorized actions such as modifying post metadata, which could lead to content manipulation, defacement, or insertion of malicious payloads. The reflected XSS component increases the risk by enabling script execution in the context of the victim's browser, potentially leading to session hijacking, credential theft, or further exploitation. Organizations relying on affected WordPress sites for content management, e-commerce, or customer engagement could face reputational damage, data breaches, and operational disruptions. The vulnerability does not directly affect availability but could be leveraged as part of a broader attack chain. Since WordPress powers a significant portion of the web, the scope of affected systems is substantial, especially for sites that have not updated or do not have compensating controls. The lack of known exploits in the wild currently limits immediate risk but does not preclude future exploitation once exploit code becomes available.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should monitor for official patches or updates from the plugin developer and apply them promptly once released. Until a patch is available, administrators can implement several practical mitigations: (1) Restrict access to the Simple Post Meta Manager plugin to trusted users only, minimizing the attack surface. (2) Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with rules to detect and block CSRF attack patterns targeting the plugin's endpoints. (3) Enforce strict Content Security Policies (CSP) to mitigate the impact of reflected XSS. (4) Educate users to avoid clicking on suspicious links and implement browser security features that limit cross-site requests. (5) Regularly audit and monitor logs for unusual activity related to post metadata changes. (6) Consider disabling or replacing the plugin with alternatives that follow secure coding practices if immediate patching is not feasible. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on compensating controls specific to the plugin's functionality and attack vectors.
Affected Countries
United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, India, France, Brazil, Netherlands, Japan, Italy
CVE-2025-32556: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Sandor Kovacs Simple Post Meta Manager
Description
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sandor Kovacs Simple Post Meta Manager simple-post-meta-manager allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Simple Post Meta Manager: from n/a through <= 1.0.9.
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-32556 identifies a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Simple Post Meta Manager WordPress plugin by Sandor Kovacs, affecting all versions up to 1.0.9. CSRF vulnerabilities allow attackers to trick authenticated users into submitting unwanted requests to a web application, thereby performing actions without the user's consent. In this case, the vulnerability is compounded by the presence of reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), which can be leveraged to bypass same-origin policies and execute malicious scripts in the victim's browser. The plugin manages post metadata in WordPress, and unauthorized modification could lead to data integrity issues or privilege escalation. The vulnerability does not require prior authentication but does require user interaction, such as visiting a malicious link. No patches or exploit code are currently publicly available, but the vulnerability is officially published and tracked. The absence of a CVSS score necessitates an assessment based on the potential impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, ease of exploitation, and scope of affected systems. The plugin is widely used in WordPress environments, which are prevalent globally, especially in countries with large WordPress user bases. The vulnerability's exploitation could allow attackers to manipulate post metadata, inject malicious content, or disrupt site functionality, impacting site owners and visitors alike.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of this vulnerability is on the integrity and confidentiality of WordPress sites using the Simple Post Meta Manager plugin. Attackers exploiting the CSRF vulnerability can perform unauthorized actions such as modifying post metadata, which could lead to content manipulation, defacement, or insertion of malicious payloads. The reflected XSS component increases the risk by enabling script execution in the context of the victim's browser, potentially leading to session hijacking, credential theft, or further exploitation. Organizations relying on affected WordPress sites for content management, e-commerce, or customer engagement could face reputational damage, data breaches, and operational disruptions. The vulnerability does not directly affect availability but could be leveraged as part of a broader attack chain. Since WordPress powers a significant portion of the web, the scope of affected systems is substantial, especially for sites that have not updated or do not have compensating controls. The lack of known exploits in the wild currently limits immediate risk but does not preclude future exploitation once exploit code becomes available.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should monitor for official patches or updates from the plugin developer and apply them promptly once released. Until a patch is available, administrators can implement several practical mitigations: (1) Restrict access to the Simple Post Meta Manager plugin to trusted users only, minimizing the attack surface. (2) Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with rules to detect and block CSRF attack patterns targeting the plugin's endpoints. (3) Enforce strict Content Security Policies (CSP) to mitigate the impact of reflected XSS. (4) Educate users to avoid clicking on suspicious links and implement browser security features that limit cross-site requests. (5) Regularly audit and monitor logs for unusual activity related to post metadata changes. (6) Consider disabling or replacing the plugin with alternatives that follow secure coding practices if immediate patching is not feasible. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on compensating controls specific to the plugin's functionality and attack vectors.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- Patchstack
- Date Reserved
- 2025-04-09T11:20:02.681Z
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 69cd73dae6bfc5ba1def3d9e
Added to database: 4/1/2026, 7:36:58 PM
Last enriched: 4/2/2026, 3:24:49 AM
Last updated: 4/6/2026, 11:15:01 AM
Views: 5
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.